Beginning Secondary Science Teachers in Different Induction Programmes: The first year of teaching

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 31, Issue 17, 2009, Pages 2355-2384

  Luft, Julie A ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649168288     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500690802369367     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105-1150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Adams, P. E., & Krockover, G. H. (1997). Concerns and perceptions of beginning secondary science and mathematics teachers. Science Education, 81, 29-50.
3. Anderson, R. D., & Mitchener, C. P. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 31-44). New York: Macmillan.
4. Appeldoorn, K. (2004). Developing and validating the Collaboratives for Excellence in Teacher Preparation (CETP) core evaluation classroom observation protocol (COP). PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
5. Banilower, E. R., Boyd, S. E., Pasley, J. D., & Weiss, I. R. (2006). Lessons from a decade of mathematics and science reform: A capstone report for the Local Systemic Change through Teacher Enhancement Initiative. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
6. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
7. Britton, E., Paine, L., Pimm, D., & Raizen, S. (2003). Comprehensive teacher induction. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
8. Committee on Science and Mathematics Teacher Preparation. (2000). Educating teachers of science, mathematics, and technology: New practices for the new millennium. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9. Crawford, B. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916-937.
10. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Davis, E., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607-651.
12. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055.
13. Furtak, E. M. (2006). The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching. Science Education, 90, 453-467.
14. Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: PCK and science education (pp. 3-17). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
15. Gold, Y. (1996). Beginning teacher support: Attrition, mentoring, and induction. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 548-594). New York: Macmillan.
16. Henry, G. T. (1990). Practical sampling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Huling-Austin, L. (1990). Teacher induction programmes and internships. In W. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of teacher education (pp. 535-548). New York: Macmillan.
18. Huling-Austin, L. (1992). Research on learning to teach: Implications for teacher induction and mentoring programmes. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 173-180.
19. Jones, M. G., & Carter, G. (2007). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs. In S. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1067-1104). Mahwah, NJ: LEA Publishers.
20. Lawrenz, F., Huffman, D., Appeldoorn, K., & Sun, T. (2002). CETP core evaluation, classroom observation handbook. Minneapolis, MN: CAREI.
21. Lawrenz, F., Huffman, D., & Gravely, A. (2007). Impact of the collaboratives for excel-lence in teacher preparation programme. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1348-1369.
22. Lee, E., Brown, M., Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. (2007). Assessing beginning secondary science teachers' PCK: Pilot year results. School Science and Mathematics, 107(2), 418-426.
23. Loughran, J. (1994). Bridging the gap: An analysis of the needs of second-year science teachers. Science Education, 78, 365-386.
24. Loughran, J., Milroy, P., Berry, A., Gunstone, R., & Mulhall, P. (2001). Documenting science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge through PaP-eRs. Research in Science Education, 31, 289-307.
25. Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370-391.
26. Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practice and beliefs? The impact of a one-year inquiry-based professional development programme on the beliefs and practices of secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 517-534.
27. Luft, J. A. (in press). Exploring science teacher education: Research in the community. In W. M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), World of science education: North America. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
28. Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). An instrument to determine the teaching beliefs of science teachers. Electronic Journal of Science Education. Retrieved December 5, 2007, from http:// ejse.southwestern.edu/volumes/v11n2/articles/art03_luft.pdf.
29. Luft, J. A., Roehrig, G. H., & Patterson, N. C. (2003). Contrasting landscapes: A comparison of the impact of different induction programmes on beginning secondary science teachers' practices, beliefs, and experiences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(1), 77-97.
30. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: PCK and science education (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
31. st Century. (2000). Before it's too late. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
32. National Research Council.(1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
33. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the NSES. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
34. Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 317-328.
35. Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and education research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
36. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In Sikula (Ed.), The handbook of research in teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 102-119). New York: Macmillan.
37. Roehrig, G. H., & Luft, J. A. (2006). Does one size fit all? The induction experience of science teachers from different teacher preparation programmes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(9), 963-985.
38. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
39. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
40. Simmons, P. E., Emory, A., Carter, T., Coker, T., Finnegan, B., Crockett, D., et al. (1999). Beginning teachers: Beliefs and classroom actions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 930-954.
41. Smith, T., Desimone, L., Zeidner, T. L., Dunn, A. C., Bhatt, M., & Rumyantseva, N. L. (2007). Inquiry-oriented instruction in science: Who teaches that way? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(3), 169-199.
42. Smith, T., & Ingersoll, R. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 681-714.
43. Stodolsky, S. S., & Grossman, P. L. (1995). The impact of subject matter on curricular activity: An analysis of five academic subjects. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 227-249.
44. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Trumbull, D. J. (1999). The new science teacher: Cultivating a good practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
46. Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137-158.
47. Wainwright, C., Flick, L., & Morrell, P. (2003). The development of instruments for assessment of instructional practices in standards based teaching. The Journal of Mathematics and Science: Collaborative Explorations. Richmond, VA: Virginia Mathematics and Science Coalition.
48. Wang, J., & Odell, S. (2002). Mentored learning to teach according to standards-based reform: A review. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 481-546.
49. Weiss, I. R., Pasley, J. D., Smith, P. S., Banilower, E. R., & Heck, D. J. (2003). Highlights report, Looking inside the classroom: A study of K-12 Mathematics and science education in the United States. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.