Sociality and the life-mind continuity thesis

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 439-463

  Froese, Tom ^a   Di Paolo, Ezequiel A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Agency; Enaction; Intersubjectivity; Life mind continuity; Phenomenology; Social cognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 77349120274     PISSN: 15687759     EISSN: 15728676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11097-009-9140-8     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Auvray, M., Hanneton, S., Lenay, C., & O'Regan, K. (2005). There is something out there: Distal attribution in sensory substitution, twenty years later. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 4(4), 505-521.
2. Auvray, M., Lenay, C., & Stewart, J. (2009). Perceptual interactions in a minimalist virtual environment. New Ideas in Psychology, 27(1), 32-47.
3. Barandiaran, X., Di Paolo, E. A., & Rohde, M. (2009). Defining agency: Individuality, normativity, asymmetry and spatio-temporality in action. Adaptive Behavior.
4. Beer, R. D. (2000). Dynamical approaches to cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(3), 91-99.
5. Boden, M. A. (2006). Of islands and interactions. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 13(5), 53-63.
6. Clark, A. (2001). Mindware: An introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Clark, A. (2005). Beyond the flesh: Some lessons from a mole cricket. Artificial Life, 11(1-2), 233-244.
9. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485-507.
11. De Jaegher, H., & Froese, T. (2009). On the role of social interaction in individual agency. Adaptive Behavior.
12. Di Paolo, E. A. (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), 429-452.
13. Di Paolo, E. A. (2009). Extended life. Topoi, 28(1), 9-21.
14. Di Paolo, E. A., Rohde, M., & Iizuka, H. (2008). Sensitivity to social contingency or stability of interaction? Modelling the dynamics of perceptual crossing. New Ideas in Psychology, 26(2), 278-294.
15. Di Paolo, E. A., Rohde, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Horizons for the enactive mind: Values, social interaction, and play. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne & E. A. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
16. Donaldson, M. (1992). Human minds: An exploration. London: Penguin Books.
17. Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. doi: 10. 1007/s11097-009-9136-4.
18. Froese, T. (2009). Hume and the enactive approach to mind. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 95-133.
19. Froese, T. & Di Paolo, E. A. (2008), "Stability of coordination requires mutuality of interaction in a model of embodied agents", in: M. Asada, et al. (eds.), From Animals to Animats 10: Proc. of the 10th Int. Conf. on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, pp. 52-61.
20. Froese, T., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2009). Modeling social interaction as perceptual crossing: An investigation into the dynamics of the interaction process. Connection Science.
21. Froese, T., & Ziemke, T. (2009). Enactive artificial intelligence: Investigating the systemic organization of life and mind. Artificial Intelligence, 173(3-4), 366-500.
22. Froese, T., Virgo, N. & Izquierdo, E. (2007), "Autonomy: a review and a reappraisal", in: F. Almeida e Costa et al. (eds.), Advances in Artificial Life: Proc. of the 9th Euro. Conf. on Artificial Life, Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, pp. 455-464.
23. Gallagher, S. (2001). The practice of mind: Theory, simulation, or primary interaction. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5-7), 83-108.
24. Gallagher, S. (2008a). Intersubjectivity in perception. Continental Philosophy Review, 41(2), 163-178.
25. Gallagher, S. (2008b). Direct perception in the intersubjective context. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(2), 535-543.
26. Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2008). The phenomenological mind: An introduction to philosophy of mind and cognitive science. London: Routledge.
27. Godfrey-Smith, P. (1996). Spencer and Dewey on life and mind. In M. Boden (Ed.), The philosophy of artificial life (pp. 314-331). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Heidegger, M. (1927). Sein und Zeit, trans. by: J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Being and time. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
29. Heidegger, M. (1929). Die Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik: Welt, Endlichkeit, Einsamkeit, trans. by: W. McNeill & N. Walker, The fundamental concepts of metaphysics: World, finitude, solitude. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1995.
30. Husserliana (Hua).
31. Husserliana I: Husserl, E. (1929). Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge, Den Haag, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1950; trans. by: D. Cairns, Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960.
32. Husserliana IX: Husserl, E. (1925). Phänomenologische Psychologie. Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1925, Den Haag, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1962; trans. by: J. Scanlon, Phenomenological Psychology: Lectures, Summer Semester, 1925, The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1977.
33. Husserliana X: Husserl, E. (1893-1917). Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins (1893-1917), Den Haag, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1966; trans. by: J. B. Brough, On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time (1893-1917), Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 1991.
34. Husserliana XIII: Husserl, E. (1905-1920). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Erster Teil: 1905-1920, Den Haag, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.
35. Husserliana XIV: Husserl, E. (1921-1928). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Zweiter Teil: 1921-1928, Den Haag, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.
36. Husserliana XV: Husserl, E. (1929-1935). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Dritter Teil: 1929-1935, Den Haag, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.
37. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
38. Jonas, H. (1966). The phenomenon of life: Toward a philosophical biology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. 2001.
39. Jonas, H. (1992). The burden and blessing of mortality. The Hastings Center Report, 22(1), 34-40.
40. Kant, I. (1790). Kritik der Urteilskraft, trans. by: W. S. Pluhar, Critique of judgment. Indianapolis: Hacket Publishing Company. 1987.
41. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala Publications.
42. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénomènologie de la perception, trans. by: C. Smith, Phenomenology of perception. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 1962.
43. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1960). Les relations avec autrui chez l'enfant, Paris, France: Cours de Sorbonne, trans. by W. Cobb, "The Child's Relations with Others", in: M. Merleau-Ponty (1964), The primacy of perception and other essays on phenomenological psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics, J. M. Edie (Ed.) (pp. 96-155). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
44. Moreno, A., & Etxeberria, A. (2005). Agency in natural and artificial systems. Artificial Life, 11(1-2), 161-175.
45. Mossio, M., & Taraborelli, D. (2008). Action-dependent perceptual invariants: From ecological to sensorimotor approaches. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(4), 1324-1340.
46. Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge: The MIT.
47. Petitmengin, C. (2006). Describing one's subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 5(3-4), 229-269.
48. Piaget, J. (1967). Biologie et connaissance, Paris, France: Editions Gallimard; transl. as: Biology and knowledge: An essay on the relations between organic regulations and cognitive processes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1971.
49. Sartre, J.-P. (1943). L'Être et le néant, trans. by H. E. Barnes, Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology. Oxon: Routledge. 2003.
50. Steiner, P., & Stewart, J. (2009). From autonomy to heteronomy (and back): The enaction of social life. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. doi: 10. 1007/s11097-009-9139-1.
51. Stewart, J. (1996). Cognition = life: Implications for higher-level cognition. Behavioral Processes, 35, 311-326.
52. Stewart, J. (2009). Foundational issues in enaction as a paradigm for cognitive science: From the origin of life to consciousness and writing. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne & E. A. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
53. Thompson, E. (2001). Empathy and consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5-7), 1-32.
54. Thompson, E. (2004). Life and mind: From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology. A tribute to Francisco Varela. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3(4), 381-398.
55. Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
56. Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
57. Tomasello, M., Call, J., & Hare, B. (2003). Chimpanzees understand psychological states-The question is which ones and to what extent. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(4), 153-156.
58. Trevarthen, C., & Hubley, P. (1978). Secondary intersubjectivity: Confidence, confiding and acts of meaning in the first year. In A. Lock (Ed.), Action, gesture and symbol: The emergence of language (pp. 183-229). London: Academic Press.
59. Varela, F. J. (1997). Patterns of life: Intertwining identity and cognition. Brain and Cognition, 34(1), 72-87.
60. Varela, F. J. (1999). The specious present: A neurophenomenology of time consciousness. In J. Petitot, F. J. Varela, B. Pachoud & J.-M. Roy (Eds.), Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science (pp. 266-317). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
61. Varela, F. J., Maturana, H. R., & Uribe, R. (1974). Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. BioSystems, 5, 187-196.
62. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
63. Von Foerster, H. (1976). Objects: Tokens for (Eigen-)Behaviors. ASC Cybernetics Forum, 8(3-4), 91-96.
64. von Uexküll, J. (1934). "Streifzüge durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen: Ein Bilderbuch unsichtbarer Welten", trans. by: C. H. Schiller, "A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: a picture book of invisible worlds". In C. H. Schiller (Ed.), Instinctive behavior: The development of a modern concept (pp. 5-80). New York: International Universities Press. Also appeared in: Semiotica, 89(4), 1992, pp. 319-391; 1957.
65. Weber, A., & Varela, F. J. (2002). Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 97-125.
66. Wheeler, M. (1997), "Cognition's Coming Home: the Reunion of Life and Mind", in: P. Husbands & I. Harvey (eds.), Proc. of the 4th Euro. Conf. on Artificial Life, Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 10-19.
67. Zahavi, D. (1996). Husserl und die transzendentale Intersubjektivität: Eine Antwort auf die sprachpragmatische Kritik, trans. by: E. A. Behnke, Husserl and Transcendental intersubjectivity: A response to the linguistic-pragmatic critique. Athens: Ohio University Press. 2001.
68. Zahavi, D. (2001). Beyond empathy: Phenomenological approaches to intersubjectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5-7), 151-167.
69. Zahavi, D. (2005). Subjectivity and selfhood: Investigating the first-person perspective. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
70. Zlatev, J. (2002). Meaning = Life (+Culture): An outline of a unified biocultural theory of meaning. Evolution of Communication, 4(2), 253-296.