Stability of coordination requires mutuality of interaction in a model of embodied agents

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5040 LNAI, Issue , 2008, Pages 52-61

  Froese, Tom ^a   Di Paolo, Ezequiel A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evolutionary robotics; Social cognition; Social contingency

Indexed keywords

DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; FLOW INTERACTIONS; METAL CLADDING; ROBOTICS; SCHRODINGER EQUATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SYSTEM STABILITY;

COORDINATION PATTERNS; COUPLED DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; EMBODIED AGENTS; EVOLUTIONARY ROBOTICS; INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIORS; INTERACTION PROCESSES; NOISY CONDITIONS; PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPLANATIONS; SIMULATED AGENTS; SOCIAL COGNITION; SOCIAL CONTINGENCY; UNDERLYING DYNAMICS;

THEOREM PROVING;

EID: 54249124082     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-69134-1_6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Beer, R.D.: The dynamics of adaptive behavior: A research program. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 20, 257-289 (1997)
2. De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E.A.: Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6, 485-507 (2007)
3. Di Paolo, E.A.: Behavioral coordination, structural congruence and entrainment in a simulation of acoustically coupled agents. Adaptive Behavior 8, 25-46 (2000)
4. Di Paolo, E.A., Rohde, M., Iizuka, H.: Sensitivity to social contingency or stability of interaction? Modelling the dynamics of perceptual crossing. New Ideas in Psychology (in press)
5. Froese, T., Virgo, N., Izquierdo, E.: Autonomy: a review and a reappraisal. In: Almeida e Costa, F., et al. (eds.) ECAL 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4648, pp. 455-464. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
6. Gergely, G., Watson, J.: Early social-emotional development: contingency perception and the social biofeedback model. In: Rochat, P. (ed.) Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life, pp. 101-137. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1999)
7. Harvey, I.: Artificial Evolution: A Continuing SAGA. In: Gomi, T. (ed.) ER-EvoRob 2001. LNCS, vol. 2217, pp. 94-109. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
8. Harvey, I., Di Paolo, E.A., Wood, R., Quinn, M., Tuci, E.A.: Evolutionary Robotics: A new scientific tool for studying cognition. Artificial Life 11, 79-98 (2005)
9. Iizuka, H., Di Paolo, E.A.: Minimal Agency Detection of Embodied Agents. In: Almeida e Costa, F., et al. (eds.) ECAL 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4648, pp. 485-494. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
10. Iizuka, H., Ikegami, T.: Adaptability and diversity in simulated turn-taking behavior. Artificial Life 10, 361-378 (2004)
11. Ikegami, T., Iizuka, H.: Turn-taking interaction as a cooperative and co-creative process. Infant Behavior and Development 30, 278-288 (2007)
12. Murray, L., Trevarthen, C.: Emotional regulations of interactions between two-month-olds and their mothers. In: Field, T.M., Fox, N.A. (eds.) Social perception in infants, pp. 177-197. Ablex Publishing, Norwood (1985)
13. Nadel, J., Carchon, I., Kervella, C., Marcelli, D., Réserbat- Plantey, D.: Expectancies for social contingency in 2-month-olds. Developmental Science 2, 164-173 (1999)
14. Quinn, M.: Evolving communication without dedicated communication channels. In: Kelemen, J., Sosík, P. (eds.) ECAL 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2159, pp. 357-366. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
15. Russel, J.: Agency: Its role in mental development. Taylor & Francis, Hove (1996)