Beyond the flesh: Some lessons from a mole cricket

Artificial Life

Volumn 11, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 232-244

  Clark, Andy ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Embodiment; Language; Mole cricket; Singing burrows; Situated reason; Surrogate situations; Symbols

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; FORMAL LANGUAGES; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EMBODIMENT; LINGUISTIC SYMBOLS; MOLE CRICKET; SINGING BURROWS; SITUATED REASON; SURROGATE SITUATIONS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

ANIMAL; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COGNITION; GRYLLIDAE; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; VOCALIZATION;

ANIMALS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COGNITION; GRYLLIDAE; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 15444372264     PISSN: 10645462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/1064546053279008     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Ballard, D., Hayhoe, M., Pook P., & Rao, R. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20(4), 723-767.
2. Barsalou, L. (1998). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577-660.
3. Beer, R. (1996). Towards the evolution of dynamical neural networks for minimally cognitive behavior. In P. Maes, M. Mataric, J.-A. Meyer, J. Pollack, & S. Wilson (Eds.), From Animals to Animats 4 (pp. 421-429). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Bowerman, M., & Choi, S. (2001). Shaping meanings for language: Universal and language-specific in the acquisition and shaping of semantic categories. In M. Bowerman, & S. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 475-511). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Boysen, S. T., Bernston, G., Hannan, M., & Cacioppo, J. (1996). Quantity-based inference and symbolic representation in chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 76-86.
6. Carruthers, P. (2002). The cognitive functions of language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(6), 657-674.
7. Cheng, K. (1986). A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation. Cognition, 23, 149-178.
8. Clark, A. (1998). Magic words: How language augments human computation. In S. Boucher, & P. Carruthers (Eds.), Thought and language (pp. 162-183). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Clark, A. (1999a). Visual awareness and visuomotor action. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(11-1), 1-18.
10. Clark, A. (1999b). "Leadership and influence: The manager as coach, nanny and artificial DNA." In J. Clippinger (Ed.), The biology of business: De-coding the natural laws of enterprise (pp. 47-66). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Clark, A. (2003). Forces, fields and the role of knowledge in action. Adaptive Behavior, 11, 270-272.
13. Clark, A., & Toribio, J. (1994). "Doing without representing?" Synthese, 101, 401-431.
14. Cox, R. (1999). Representation construction, externalized cognition and individual differences. Learning and Instruction, 9, 343-363.
15. Dennett, D. (1996). Kinds of minds. New York: Basic Books.
16. DeLoache, J. S. (1991). Symbolic functioning in very young children: Understanding of pictures and models. Child Development, 62, 736-752.
17. DeLoache, J. S., & Burns, N. M. (1994). Symbolic functioning in preschool children. Applied Developmental Psychology, 15, 513-527.
18. Gedenryd, H. (1998). How designers work: Making sense of authentic cognitive activities. PhD Dissertation, Lund University Cognitive Studies, Lund, Sweden.
19. Gregory, R. (1981). Mind in science: A history of explanations in psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Goldstone, R., & Sakamoto, Y. (2003). The transfer of abstract principles governing complex adaptive systems. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 414-466.
21. Hermer, L., & Spelke, E. (1994). A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children. Nature, 370, 57-59.
22. Hermer, L., & Spelke, E. (1996). Modularity and development: The case of spatial reorientation. Cognition, 61, 195-232.
23. Hermer-Vazquez, L., Spelke, E., & Katsnelson, A. (1999). Sources of flexibility in human cognition: Dual-task studies of space and language. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 3-36.
24. Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Kelso, J. A. S. (unpublished). Computational versus dynamical accounts in cognitive science: Coexisting alternatives? Center for Complex Systems & Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University.
26. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
27. Lucy, J., & Gaskins, S. (2001). Grammatical categories and the development of classification preferences: A comparative approach. In M. Bowerman, & S. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 257-283). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Markman, A., & Genter, D. (1993). Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 431-467.
29. Mataric, M. (1992). Integration of representation into goal-driven behavior based robots. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 8, 304-312.
30. McBeath, M. K., Shaffer, D. M., & Kaiser, M. K. (1995). How baseball outfielders determine where to run to catch fly balls. Science, 268 569-573.
31. Milner, A., & Goodale, M. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32. O'Reilly, R. (in press). The division of labor between the neocortex and hippocampus. In George Houghton (Ed.), Connectionist modeling in cognitive (neuro-)science. Psychology Press.
33. O'Reilly, R., & Munakata, Y. (2000). Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Partee, H. H. (1987). Instabilitites and information in biological self-organization. In F. E. Yates (Ed.), Self-organizing systems: The emergence of order. New York: Plenum Press.
35. Pfeifer, R., & Scheier, C. (2001). Understanding intelligence (2nd printing, paperback ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Raibert, M. H., & Hodgins, J. K. (1993). Legged robots. In R. D. Beer, R. E. Ritzmann, & T. McKenna (Eds.), Biological neural networks in invertebrate neuroethology and robotics (pp. 319-354). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37. Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: How do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 185-213.
38. Slocum, A. C., Downey, D. C., & Beer, R. D. (2000). Further experiments in the evolution of minimally cognitive behavior: From perceiving affordances to selective attention. In J. Meyer, A. Berthoz, D. Floreano, H. Roitblat,, & S. Wilson (Eds.), From Animals to Animats 6: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (pp. 430-439). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Smith, L. (2001). How domain-general processes may create domain-specific biases. In M. Bowerman, & S. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 101-131). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. Spelke, E., & Tsivkin, S. (2001). Language and number: A bilingual training study. Cognition, 57, 45-88.
41. Sterelny, K. (2003). Thought in a hostile world. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
42. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Thelen, E., Schoner, G., Scheier, C., & Smith, L. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 1-55.
44. Thompson, R. K. R., Oden, D. L., & Boysen, S. T. (1997). Language-naive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) judge relations between relations in a conceptual matching-to-sample task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processses, 23, 31-43.
45. Thompson, E., & Varela, F. (2001). Radical embodiment: Neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(10), 418-425.
46. Turner, S. J. (2000). The extended organism: The physiology of animal-built structures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Van Gelder, T. (1995). What might cognition be, if not computation? Journal of Philosophy, XCII(7), 345-381.
48. Van Gelder, T. J. (1998). The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 1-14.
49. Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Webb, B. (1996). A cricket robot. Scientific American, 275, 62-67.