From autonomy to heteronomy (and back): The enaction of social life

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 527-550

  Steiner, Pierre ^a   Stewart, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE COMPIÈGNE   (France)

Author keywords

Autonomy; Heteronomy; Normativity; Social cognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 77349119178     PISSN: 15687759     EISSN: 15728676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11097-009-9139-1     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Adolphs, R. (1999). Social cognition and the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci, 3, 469-479.
2. Anspach, M. R., & Varela, F. (1992). Le système immunitaire: un "soi" cognitif autonome. In D. Andler (Ed.), Introduction aux sciences cognitives (pp. 489-509). Paris: Folio/Gallimard.
3. Beer, J., & Ochsner, K. (2006). Social cognition: a multi-level analysis. Brain Res, 1079, 98-105.
4. Brandom, R. (1979). Freedom and constraint by norms. Am Philos Q, 16(3), 187-196.
5. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making. An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology & the Cognitive Sciences, 6, 485-507.
7. Descombes, V. (2004). Le complément de sujet. Enquête sur le fait d'agir de soi-même. Paris: Gallimard.
8. Dewey, J. (1929). Experience and nature. New York: Dover.
9. Durkheim, E. (1973). Les règles de la méthode sociologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (original: 1895).
10. Durkheim, E. (1983). Professional ethics and civil morals. Translated by C. Brookfield. Westport: Greenwood Press. (original: 1902).
11. Durkheim, E. (1985). Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (original: 1912).
12. Ehrenberg, A. (2005). Agir de soi-même. Esprit, Juillet, 2005, 200-209.
13. Ehrenberg, A. (2008). Le cerveau « social ». Chimère épistémologique et vérité sociologique. Esprit. Janvier, 2008, 79-103.
14. Gallagher, S. (2001). The practice of mind: Theory, simulation, or primary interaction? J Conscious Stud, 8, 83-108.
15. Gallese, V., Keysers, Chr, & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends Cogn Sci, 8(No. 9), 396-403.
16. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
17. Giddens, A. (1976). New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretive sociologies. London: Hutchinson.
18. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19. Goddard, J.-C. (2003). Autonomie, réduction et réflexivité: la philosophie naturelle de Francisco. J. Varela et le projet transcendental. Intellectica, 36-37, 205-225.
20. Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters. Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
21. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.
22. Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order. Am Sociol Rev, 48, 1-17.
23. Haugeland, J. (1998). Having thought: Essays in the metaphysics of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
24. Husserl, E. (1989). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. Second Book: studies in the phenomenology of constitution. Translated by R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
25. Hutto, D. (2008). Folk psychological narratives. The sociocultural basis of understanding reasons. Cambridge: MIT Press.
26. Kaplan, D. (2003). Ricoeur's critical theory. New York: SUNY Press.
27. Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1998). The tree of knowledge. The biological roots of human understanding (Revisedth ed.). Boston: Shambhala.
28. Mauss, M. (1936). Les techniques du corps. In M. Mauss (Ed.), Sociologie et anthropologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1950.
29. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
30. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Le visible et l'invisible. Paris: Gallimard.
31. Ogien, A. (2007). Les règles de la pratique sociologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
32. Pettit, Ph. (1993). The common mind. An essay on psychology, society, and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: the modern denial of human nature. London: Penguin.
34. Rawls, J. (1955). Two concepts of rules. In S. Freeman (Ed.), John Rawls: Collected papers (pp. 20-46). Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1999.
35. Ricoeur, P. (1995). Oneself as another. Translation by K. Blamey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Schütz, A. (1962). In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected papers I: The problem of social reality. The Hague: Nijhoff.
37. Schütz, A. (1975). In I. Schütz (Ed.), Collected papers III: Studies in phenomenological philosophy. The Hague: Nijhoff.
38. Sellars, W. (1980). In J. F. Sicha (Ed.), Pure pragmatics and possible worlds. The early essays of Wilfrid Sellars. Atascadero (CA): Ridgeview.
39. Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Malden: Blackwell.
40. Stewart, J. (2009). Foundational issues in enaction as a paradigm for cognitive science: From the origin of life to consciousness and writing. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne & E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
41. Varela, F. (1989). Autonomie et connaissance. Essai sur le vivant. Translation by P. Bourgine and P. Dumouchel. Paris: Seuil.
42. Varela, F. (1997). Patterns of life: Intertwining identity and cognition. Brain Cogn, 34, 72-87.