Hume and the enactive approach to mind

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 95-133

  Froese, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognitive science; Enactive; Enactivism; Human nature; Hume; Life; Mind; Phenomenology

Indexed keywords

EID: 59849100277     PISSN: 15687759     EISSN: 15728676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11097-008-9111-5     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. W. R. Ashby 1947 The nervous system as physical machine: With special reference to the origin of adaptive behavior Mind 56 221 44 59
2. Ayer, A. J. (1980). Hume. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2000.
3. R. D. Beer 2000 Dynamical approaches to cognitive science Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 3 91 99
4. R. D. Beer 2003 The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent Adaptive Behavior 11 4 209 243
5. Biro, J. (1993). Hume's new science of the mind. In D. F. Norton (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hume (pp. 33-63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. M. Bitbol 2002 Science as if situation mattered Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 181 224
7. M. A. Boden 2008 Autonomy: What is it? BioSystems 91 2 305 308
8. R. A. Brooks 1991 Intelligence without representation Artificial Intelligence 47 1-3 139 160
9. Buckle, S. (2001). Hume's enlightenment tract: The unity and purpose of 'an enquiry concerning human understanding. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10. Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11. Chrisley, R., & Ziemke, T. (2002). Embodiment. In L. Nadel, et al. (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of cognitive science (pp. 1102-1108). London, UK: Macmillan.
12. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
13. A. Clark J. Toribio 1994 Doing without representing? Synthese 101 3 401 431
14. Cliff, D. (1991). Computational neuroethology: A provisional manifesto. In J.-A. Meyer, & S. W. Wilson (Eds.), From animals to animats: Proc. of the 1st Int. Conf. on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (pp. 29-39). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
15. M. Collier 1999 Filling the gaps: Hume and connectionism on the continued existence of unperceived objects Hume Studies 25 1-2 155 170
16. M. Collier 2005 Hume and cognitive science: The current status of the controversy over abstract ideas Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 2 197 207
17. Colombetti, G. (2008). Enaction, sense-making and emotion. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne & E. A. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT, in press.
18. Copley, S., & Edgar, A. (1998). Introduction. In S. Copley, & A. Edgar (Eds.), David Hume: Selected essays (pp. vii-xxii). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY: Putnam.
20. Davie, G. (1977). Edmund Husserl and 'the as yet, in its most important respect, unrecognized greatness of Hume. In G. P. Morice (Ed.), David Hume: Bicentenary papers (pp. 69-76). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
21. H. De Jaegher E. A. Di Paolo 2007 Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 4 485 507
22. Deleuze, G. (1953). Empirisme et subjectivité: Essai sure la Nature Humaine selon Hume, trans. by: C. V. Boundas, Empiricism and Subjectivity: An Essay on Hume's Theory of Human Nature. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, (1991).
23. Dennett, D. C. (1978). Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.
24. Dennett, D. C. (1984). Cognitive wheels: The frame problem of AI. In C. Hookway (Ed.), Minds, machines, and evolution: Philosophical studies (pp. 129-151). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Depraz, N., Varela, F. J., & Vermersch, P. (2003). On becoming aware: A pragmatics of experiencing. The Netherlands, Amsterdam: Benjamins.
26. Di Paolo, E. A. (2003). Organismically-inspired robotics: homeostatic adaptation and teleology beyond the closed sensorimotor loop. In K. Murase, & T. Asakura (Eds.), Dynamical systems approach to embodiment and sociality (pp. 19-42). Adelaide, Australia: Advanced Knowledge International.
27. E. A. Di Paolo 2005 Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 4 429 452
28. Di Paolo, E. A., Rohde, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2008). Horizons for the enactive mind: Values, social interaction, and play. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne & E. A. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT, in press.
29. H. L. Dreyfus 2007 Why Heideggerian AI failed and how fixing it would require making it more Heideggerian Philosophical Psychology 20 2 247 268
30. H. L. Dreyfus S. E. Dreyfus 1988 Making a mind versus modelling the brain: artificial intelligence back at a branch-point Daedalus 117 1 15 44
31. Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Fodor, J. A. (2003). Hume variations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33. Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34. D. Garrett 1981 Hume's self-doubts about personal identity The Philosophical Review 90 3 337 358
35. Garrett, D. (1997). Cognition and commitment in Hume's philosophy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36. Harnish, R. M. (2002). Minds, brains, computers: An historical introduction to the foundations of cognitive science. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
37. Harvey, I. (2008). Misrepresentations. In S. Bullock, J. Noble, R. Watson, & M. Bedau (Eds.), Artificial life XI: Proc. of the 11th Int. Conf. on the simulation and synthesis of living systems (pp. 227-233). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
38. Hume, D. (1739-1740a). In D. F. Norton, & M. J. Norton (Eds.), A treatise of human nature. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2000.
39. Hume, D. (1739-1740b). An abstract of - A treatise of human nature. In D. F. Norton, & M. J. Norton (Eds.), David Hume: A treatise of human nature. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2000.
40. Hume, D. (1741). Of the delicacy of taste and passion. In S. Copley, & A. Edgar (Eds.), David Hume: Selected essays (pp. 10-13). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1998.
41. Hume, D. (1748). In T. L. Beauchamp (Ed.), An enquiry concerning human understanding. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1999.
42. Hume, D. (1757). Of the standard of taste. In S. Copley, & A. Edgar (Eds.), David Hume: Selected essays (pp. 133-154). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1998.
43. Hume, D. (1779). Dialogues concerning natural religion. In J. C. A. Gaskin (Ed.), David Hume: Principal writings on religion including dialogues concerning natural religion and the natural history of religion. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1998.
44. Husserl, E. (1929). Formale und transzendentale Logik. Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft. In P. Janssen (Ed.), Husserliana XVII. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1974.
45. Izquierdo, E., & Harvey, I. (2007). The dynamics of associative learning in an evolved situated agent. In F. Almeida e Costa, et al. (Ed.), ECAL 2007: Proc. of the 9th Euro. Conf. on Artificial Life (pp. 365-374). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
46. Izquierdo-Torres, E., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2005). Is an embodied system ever purely reactive? In M. Capcarrere, et al. (Ed.), ECAL 2005: Proc. of the 8th Euro. Conf. on Artificial Life (pp. 252-261). Germany, Berlin: Springer.
47. Jonas, H. (1966). The phenomenon of life: Toward a philosophical biology. Evanston,Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 2001.
48. N. Kemp Smith 1905 The naturalism of Hume (I.) Mind 14 54 149 173
49. Kemp Smith, N. (1935). Introduction. In N. K. Smith (Ed.), Hume's dialogues concerning natural religion (pp. 1-153). London, UK: Oxford University Press.
50. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic.
51. McCarthy, J., & Hayes, P. J. (1969). Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In B. Meltzer, & D. Michie (Eds.), Machine intelligence 4 (pp. 463-502). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
52. McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & the PDP Research Group (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 2: Psychological and biological models. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
53. M. McGann 2007 Enactive theorists do it on purpose: Toward an enactive account of goals and goal-directedness Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 4 463 483
54. Moran, D. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. London, UK: Routledge.
55. A. Newell H. A. Simon 1976 Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 19 3 113 126
56. Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
57. J. K. O'Regan A. Noë 2001 A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 5 939 1031
58. Pylyshyn, Z. (1984). Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
59. Rosenberg, A. (1993). Hume and the philosophy of science. In D. F. Norton (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Hume (pp. 64-89). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60. Roy, J.-M., Petitot, J., Pachoud, B., & Varela, F. J. (1999). Beyond the gap: An introduction to naturalizing phenomenology. In J. Petitot, F. J. Varela, B. Pachoud, & J.-M. Roy (Eds.), Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science (pp. 1-80). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
61. Schliesser, E. (2007). Hume's Newtonianism and Anti-Newtonianism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Summer 2007 Edition, URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2007/entries/hume-newton/.
62. Sellars, W. (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In H. Feigl, & M. Scriven (Eds.), The foundations of science and the concepts of psychology and psychoanalysis (pp. 253-329). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
63. Smith, B. C. (2007). The objectivity of tastes and tasting. In B. C. Smith (Ed.), Questions of taste: The philosophy of wine (pp. 41-77). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
64. P. Smolensky 1988 On the proper treatment of connectionism Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 1 1 23
65. Stewart, J., Di Paolo, E. A., & Gapenne, O. (2008). Introduction. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. A. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT, in press.
66. Stroud, B. (1977). Hume. New York, NY: Routledge.
67. E. Thompson 2004 Life and mind: From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology. A tribute to Francisco Varela Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 4 381 398
68. Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
69. S. Torrance 2005 In search of the enactive: Introduction to special issue on enactive experience Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 4 357 368
70. T. Van Gelder 1998 The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 5 615 665
71. Van Gelder, T., & Port, R. F. (1995). It's about time: An overview of the dynamical approach to cognition. In R. F. Port, & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition (pp. 1-43). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
72. Varela, F. J. (1992). Un Know-How per l'Etica, trans. as: Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999.
73. F. J. Varela 1996 Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 4 330 349
74. F. J. Varela 1997 Patterns of life: Intertwining identity and cognition Brain and Cognition 34 1 72 87
75. Varela, F. J. (1999). The specious present: A neurophenomenology of time consciousness. In J. Petitot, F. J. Varela, B. Pachoud, & J.-M. Roy (Eds.), Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science (pp. 266-314). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
76. F. J. Varela N. Depraz 2005 At the source of time: Valence and the constitutional dynamics of affect Journal of Consciousness Studies 12 8-10 61 81
77. F. J. Varela J. Shear 1999 First-person methodologies: What, Why, How? Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 2-3 1 14
78. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
79. Waxman, W. (1994). Hume's theory of consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
80. A. Weber F. J. Varela 2002 Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 97 125
81. Wheeler, M. (2005). Reconstructing the cognitive world: The next step. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
82. Zahavi, D. (1996). Husserl und die transzendentale Intersubjektivitä t: Eine Antwort auf die sprachpragmatische Kritik, trans. by: E. A. Behnke, Husserl and Transcendental Intersubjectivity: A response to the linguistic-pragmatic critique. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2001.