Action-dependent perceptual invariants: From ecological to sensorimotor approaches

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1324-1340

  Mossio, Matteo ^a,b   Taraborelli, Dario ^c  

^a Universite Paris 2   (France)

^b ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action; Ecological psychology; Enaction; Invariants; Perception; Self motion; Sensorimotor theories

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; ECOSYSTEM; LOCOMOTION; MOTOR CONTROL; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION;

EID: 55749109722     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Bach y Rita P. Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution (1972), Academic Press, New York
2. Barfield W., and Furness T.A. Virtual environments and advanced interface design (1995), Oxford University Press, Oxford
3. Berthoz A. The brain's sense of movement (2000), Harvard University Press, Cambridge
4. Blakemore S.J., Frith C.D., and Wolpert D.M. Perceptual modulation of self-produced stimuli: The role of spatio-temporal prediction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11 5 (1999) 551-559
5. Broackes J. Experience, attention, and mental representation. BBS 224 5 (2001) 978-979
6. Carello C., and Turvey M.T. Rotational dynamics and dynamic touch. In: Heller M. (Ed). Touch, representation, and blindness (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England 27-66
7. Carello C., Kinsella-Shaw J., Amazeen E., and Turvey M.T. Peripheral neuropathy and object length perception by effortful (dynamic) touch: A case study. Neuroscience Letters 405 (2006) 159-163
8. Cutting J.E. Perception with an eye for motion (1986), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
9. Duhamel J.R., Colby C.L., and Goldberg M.E. The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. Science 255 5040 (1992) 90-92
10. Findlay J.M., and Gilchrist I.D. Active vision. The psychology of looking and seeing (2003), Oxford University Press, Oxford
11. Fodor J.A., and Pylyshyn Z.W. How direct is visual perception? Some reflections on Gibson's ecological approach. Cognition 9 (1981) 139-196
12. Gallistel, C. R. (1980). The organisation of action: A new synthesis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Gibson J.J. The perception of the visual world (1950), Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut
14. Gibson J.J. Perception as a function of stimulation. In: Koch S. (Ed). Psychology. A study of a science Vol. 1 (1959), McGraw-Hill, New York 456-501
15. Gibson J.J. Pictures, perspective, and perception. Daedalus 89 (1960) 216-227
16. Gibson J.J. The senses considered as perceptual systems (1966), Houghton Mifflin, Boston
17. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception (1979), Houghton Mifflin, Boston
18. Gonzalez J.C., and Bach-y-Rita P. Perceptual adaptive recalibration: Tactile sensory substitution in blind subjects. Behavior and Philosophy (2003)
19. Held R. Plasticity in sensory-motor systems. Scientific American 213 5 (1965) 84-94
20. Helmholtz H. Epistemological writings (1878-1977), D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht/Boston
21. Hurley S. Consciousness in action (1998), Harvard University Press, Cambridge
22. Hurley S. Perception and action: Alternative views. Synthese 291 (2001) 3-40
23. Jacob, P. (2006). Why visual experience is likely to resist being enacted. Psyche, 12(1). Available from http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/symposia/noe/Jacob.pdf.
24. Jacob P., and Jeannerod M. Ways of seeing: The scope and limits of visual cognition (2003), Oxford University Press, Oxford
25. Jarvilehto T. The theory of the organism-environment system: III. Role of efferent influences on receptors in the formation of knowledge. Integrative Physiological and Behavioural Science 34 (1999) 90-100
26. Koenderink J.J., and Van Doorn A.J. Invariant properties of the motion parallax field due to the movement of rigid bodies relative to an observer. Optica Acta 22 (1975) 773-791
27. Koenderink J.J. Optic flow. Vision Research 26 1 (1986) 161-179
28. Lee D.N. A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception 5 (1976) 437-459
29. Lee D.N. Visuo-motor coordination in space-time. In: Stelmach G.E., and Requin J. (Eds). Tutorials in motor behavior (1980), North-Holland, Amsterdam 281-295
30. Lenay, C., Cannu, S., & Villon, P. (1997).Technology and perception: The contribution of sensory substitution systems. Second international conference on cognitive technology (pp. 44-53). Aizu, Japan, Los Alamitos: IEEE.
31. Lenay, C., Gapenne, O., Hanneton, S., Marque, C., & Genouëlle, C. (2003). Sensory substitution: Limits and perspectives. In Y. Hatwell, A. Streri, & E. Gentaz (Eds.), Touch for knowing (pp. 275-292). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
32. MacKay D. Theoretical models of space perception. In: Muses C.A. (Ed). Aspects of the theory of artificial intelligence (1962), Plenum Press, New York
33. MacKay D. The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills (1987), Springer, New York
34. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Boston studies in the philosophy of sciences (Vol. 42). Dordrecht/Boston: D. Riedel Publishing Co.
35. Michaels C.F., and Carello C. Direct perception (1981), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New York
36. Milner A.D., and Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action (1995), Oxford University Press, Oxford
37. Nawrot M. Depth from motion parallax scales with eye movement gain. Journal of Vision 3 11 (2003) 841-851
38. Noë A. On what we see. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2002) 57-80
39. Noë A. Action in perception (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
40. Ono M.E., Rivest J., and Ono H. Depth perception as a function of motion parallax and absolute-distance information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 12 (1986) 331-337
41. O'Regan J.K., and Noë A. A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 5 (2001) 939-1011
42. Philipona D., O'Regan J.K., and Nadal J.-P. Is there something out there? Inferring space from sensorimotor dependencies. Neural Computation 15 9 (2003)
43. Philipona, D., O'Regan, J. K., Nadal, J.-P., & Coenen, O. J.-M. D. (2004). Perception of the structure of the physical world using unknown multimodal sensors and effectors. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 15.
44. Philipona D., and O'Regan J.K. Color naming, unique hues and hue cancellation predicted from singularities in reflection properties. Visual Neuroscience 23 (2006) 331-339
45. Poincaré, H. (1902). La science et l'hypothèse. Paris: Flammarion.
46. Port R.F., and van Gelder T. Mind as motion (1995), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
47. Prinz, J. (2006). Putting the Brakes on Enactive Perception. Psyche, 12 (1). Available from http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/symposia/noe/Prinz.pdf.
48. Pylyshyn Z.W. Seeing, acting, and knowing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 5 (2001) 999
49. Reed E.S. An outline of a theory of action systems. Journal of Motor Behavior 14 (1982) 98-134
50. Reed E.S. Motor variability but functional specificity: Demise of the concept of motor commands. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9 (1986) 620-622
51. Reed E.S. Encountering the world: Toward an ecological psychology (1996), Oxford University Press, New York
52. Rogers B., and Graham M. Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception 8 (1979) 125-134
53. Rogers B., and Graham M. Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception. Vision Research 22 (1982) 261-270
54. Sampaio, E. (1995). Les substitutions sensorielles adaptées aux déficits visuels importants. In A. B. Safran, & A. Assimacopoulos (Eds.), Le déficit visuel. Des fondements neurophysiologiques à la pratique de la réadaptation. Paris: Masson.
55. Shaw, R. E., Kugler, P. N., & Kinsella-Shaw, J. M. (1990). Reciprocities of intentional systems. In R. Warren, & A. H. Wertheim (Eds.), Perception and control of self-motion (pp. 579-619). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Sheerer E. Motor theories of cognitive structure: A historical review. In: Prinz W., and Sanders A.F. (Eds). Cognition and motor processes (1984), Springer Verlag, Berlin
57. Scholl B.J., and Simons D. Change blindness, Gibson and the sensorimotor theory of vision. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 5 (2001) 1004-1005
58. Stark L., and Bridgeman B. Role of corollary discharge in space constancy. Perception and Psychophysics 34 4 (1983) 371-380
59. Steinbach M.J., Ono H., and Wolf M. Motion parallax judgments of depth as a function of the direction and type of head movement. Canadian Journal of Psychology 45 (1991) 92-98
60. Stoffregen T.A., and Bardy B.G. On specification and the senses. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2001) 195-213
61. Stoffregen, T. A., & Bardy, B. G. (2004). Multisensory enactive interfaces and the global array, Online Paper, http://www.interdisciplines.org/enaction/papers/3.
62. Stoffregen T.A., Bardy B.G., and Mantel B. Affordances in the design of enactive systems. Journal of Virtual Reality Research 10 (2006) 4-10
63. Telford L., Howard I.P., and Ohmi M. Heading judgments during active and passive self-motion. Experimental Brain Research 104 (1995) 502-510
64. Thelen E., and Smith L.B. A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action (1994), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass
65. Turvey M.T. Dynamic touch. American Psychologist 51 11 (1996) 1134-1152
66. Turvey M.T., and Carello C. The ecological approach to perceiving-acting: A pictorial essay. Acta Psychologica 63 (1986) 133-155
67. Ujike H., and Ono H. Depth thresholds of motion parallax as a function of head movement velocity. Vision Research 41 (2001) 2835-2843
68. Van Boxtel J.J.A., Wexler M., and Droulez J. Perception of plane orientation from self-generated and passively observed optic flow. Journal of Vision 3 (2003) 318-332
69. Varela, F. (1979). Principles of biological autonomy. New York: North Holland.
70. Varela F., Thompson E., and Rosch E. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience (1991), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
71. Wallach H., and O'Connell D.N. The kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (1953) 205-217
72. Wallach H., Stanton L., and Becker D. The compensation for movement-produced changes in object orientation. Perception & Psychophysics 15 (1974) 339-343
73. Warren, W. H. (1988). Action modes and laws of control for the visual guidance of action. In O. Meijer, & K. Roth (Eds.), Movement behavior: The motor-action controversy (pp. 339-380). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
74. Warren W.H. Visually controlled locomotion: 40 years later. Ecological Psychology 10 (1998) 177-219
75. Warren, W. H. (2006a). Enactive knowledge: Sensory-motor expectancies or perception-action invariants? Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Enactive Interfaces, Montpellier, France, p. 15.
76. Warren W.H. The dynamics of perception and action. Psychological Review 113 2 (2006) 358-389
77. Wexler M., Panerai F., Lamouret I., and Droulez J. Self-motion and the perception of stationary objects. Nature 409 (2001) 85-88
78. Wexler M., Lamouret I., and Droulez J. The stationarity hypothesis: An allocentric criterion in visual perception. Vision Research 41 (2001) 3023-3037
79. Wexler M. Allocentric perception of space and voluntary head movement. Psychological Science 14 (2003) 340-346
80. Wexler M., and Van Boxtel J.J.A. Depth perception by the active observer. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (2005) 431-438
81. White B.W., Saunders F.A., Scadden L., Bach y Rita P., and Collins C.C. Seeing with the skin. Perception and Psychophysics 7 (1970) 23-27
82. Withagen R., and Michaels C.F. On ecological conceptualizations of perceptual systems and action systems. Theory & Psychology 15 5 (2005) 603-620
83. Wolff P. Position of code and code for position: From isomorphism to a sensorimotor account of space perception. Visual Cognition 11 (2004) 137-160
84. Wolpert D.M., and Flanagan J.R. Motor prediction. Current Biology 11 (2001) 729-732