Erratum to: The impact of client and auditor gender on auditors’ judgments (Accounting Horizons, (2009), 23, 1, 1-18, (10.2308/acch.2009.23.1.1));The impact of client and auditor gender on auditors' judgments

Accounting Horizons

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-18

  Gold, Anna ^a   Hunton, James E ^b   Gomaa, Mohamed I ^c  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b BENTLEY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Audit judgment; Auditor gender; Client gender; Gender stereotypes; Risk taking; Selectivity hypothesis

Indexed keywords

EID: 77249087617     PISSN: 08887993     EISSN: 15587975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/acch-10432     Document Type: Erratum

References (63)

1. Almer, E. D., J. R. Hopper, and S. E. Kaplan. 1998. The effect of diversity-related attributes on hiring, advancement and voluntary turnover judgments. Accounting Horizons 12 (1):1-17.
2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants AICPA. 2006. AICPA Work/Life and Women's Initiatives 2004 Research. A Decade of Changes in the Accounting Profession: Workforce Trends and Human Capital Practices. New York, NY: AICPA.
3. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants AICPA. 2008. 2008 Trends in the Supply of Accounting Graduates and the Demand for Public Accounting Recruits. New York, NY: AICPA.
4. Anderson, J. C., E. N. Johnson, and P. M. J. Reckers. 1994. Perceived effects of gender, family structure and physical appearance on career progression in public accounting: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 19 (6):483-491.
5. Anderson, U., L. Koonce, and G. Marchant. 1994. The effects of source-competence information and its timing on auditors' performance of analytical procedures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 13 (1):137-148.
6. Berger, J., M. H. Fisek, R. Z. Norman, and M. Zelditch. 1977. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach. New York, NY: Elsevier.
7. Biernat, M., and K. Fuegen. 2001. Shifting standards and the evaluation of competence: Complexity in gender-based judgment and decision making. The Journal of Social Issues 57 (4):707-724.
8. Bluedorn, A. C. 1983. Attitudes and attributions toward women as managers and their performance. Academy of Management Conference: 397-401.
9. Brenner, O. C., and N. J. Beutell. 2001. The effect of birth order and gender and American managers' attitudes toward female managers. The Journal of Social Psychology 129 (1):57-64.
10. Broder, I. E. 1993. Review of NSF Economics proposals: Gender and institutional patterns. The American Economic Review 83 (4):964-970.
11. Byrnes, J. P., D. C. Miller, and W. D. Schafer. 1999. Gender differences in risk raking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 125 (3):367-383.
12. Carli, L. L. 1990. Gender, language and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 941-951.
13. Carli, L. L. 2001. Gender and social influence. The Journal of Social Issues 57 (4):725-741.
14. Chung, J., and G. S. Monroe. 1998. Gender differences in information processing: An empirical test of the hypothesis-confirming strategy in an audit context. Accounting and Finance 38 (2):265-279.
15. Chung, J., and G. S. Monroe. 2001. A research note on the effects of gender and task complexity on an audit judgment. Behavioral Research in Accounting 13: 111-125.
16. Collins, K. M. 1993. Stress and departures from the public accounting profession: A study of gender differences. Accounting Horizons 7 (1):29-38.
17. Cordano, M., R. F. Scherer, and C. L. Owen. 2003. Dimensionality of the Women as Managers Scale: Factor congruency among three samples. The Journal of Social Psychology 143 (1):141-143.
18. Crino, M. D., M. C. White, and G. L. SeSanctis. 1981. A comment on the dimensionality and reliability of the Women as Managers Scale WAMS. Academy of Management Journal 24 (4):866-876.
19. Dennis, D. M., and T. J. Engle. 1996. The effect of litigation on public accounting as a career choice. Accounting Horizons 10 (2):1-13.
20. Dunning, D., and D. A. Sherman. 1997. Stereotypes and tacit inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73 (3):459-471.
21. Dwyer, P., J. Gilkeson, and J. A. List. 2002. Gender differences in revealed risk taking: Evidence from mutual fund investors. Economics Letters 76 (2):151-158.
22. Eagly, A. H., M. G. Makhijani, and B. G. Klonsky. 1992. Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 111: 3-22.
23. Goldberg, J. 1968. Are women prejudiced against women? Trans-Action 5: 28-30.
24. Greenwald, A. G., and M. R. Banaji. 1995. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review 102: 4-27.
25. Hackenbrack, K. 1992. Implications of seemingly irrelevant evidence in audit judgment. Journal of Accounting Research 30 (1):126-136.
26. Harding, J. R., K. F. Reding, and M. H. Stocks. 2002. The effect of gender on the recruitment of entry-level accountants. Journal of Managerial Issues 14 (2):251-266.
27. Heilman, M. E., C. Block, R. Martell, and M. Simon. 1989. Has anything changed? Current characterizations of males, females and managers. The Journal of Applied Psychology 74: 935-942.
28. Heilman, M. E., C. Block, R. Martell, M. Simon, A. S. Wallen, D. Fuchs, and M. M. Tankins. 2004. Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. The Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (3):416-427.
29. Heilman, M. E., C. Block, R. Martell, M. Simon, A. S. Wallen, D. Fuchs, M. M. Tankins, and J. J. Chen. 2005. Same behavior, different consequences: Reactions to men's and women's altruistic citizenship behavior. The Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (3):431-441.
30. Hinz, R. P., D. D. McCarthy, and J. A. Turner. 1997. Are women conservative investors? Gender differences in participant-directed pension investments. In Positioning Pensions for the Twenty-First Century, edited by Gordon, M. G., O. S. Mitchell, and M. M. Twinney, 91-103. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
31. Hull, R. P., and P. H. Umansky. 1997. An examination of gender stereotyping as an explanation for vertical job segregation in public accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 22 (6):507-528.
32. Jianakoplos, N. A., and A. Bernasek. 1998. Are women more risk averse? Economic Inquiry 36 (4): 620-630.
33. Johnson, E. N., S. E. Kaplan, and P. M. J. Reckers. 1998. An examination of potential gender-based differences in audit managers' performance evaluation judgments. Behavioral Research in Accounting 10: 47-75.
34. Lockheed, M. E. 1985. Sex and social influence: A meta-analysis guided by theory. In Status, Rewards, and Influence: How Expectations Organize Behavior, edited by Berger, J., and M. Zelditch, 406-429. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
35. Mathison, D. L. 1986. Sex differences in the perception of assertiveness among female managers. The Journal of Social Psychology 126 (5):599-606.
36. Meyers-Levy, J. 1989. Gender differences in information processing: A selectivity interpretation. In Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising, edited by Cafferata, P., and A. Tybout, 219-260. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
37. Meyers-Levy, J., and D. Maheswaran. 1991. Exploring differences in males' and females' processing strategy. The Journal of Consumer Research 18 (1):63-70.
38. Meyers-Levy, J., D. Maheswaran, and B. Sternthal. 1991. Gender differences in the use of message cues and judgments. Journal of Marketing Research 28: 84-96.
39. Meyers-Levy, J., D. Maheswaran, and B. Sternthal. 1998. Mixed messages: How men and women differ in their responses to marketing messages. Capital Ideas 1 3. http://www.chicagogsb.edu/capideas/sum98/meyers.htm.
40. Norton, M. I., J. A. Vandello, and J. M. Darley. 2004. Casuistry and social category bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (6):817-831.
41. Nöteberg, A., and J. E. Hunton. 2005. Client inquiry via electronic communication media: Does the medium matter? Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research 8: 87-112.
42. Nyberg-Stuart, A. 2006. What women want. CFO Magazine 22 (7):46-54.
43. O'Donnell, E., and E. N. Johnson. 2001. The effects of auditor gender and task complexity on information processing efficiency. International Journal of Auditing 5 (2):91-105.
44. Olsen, R. A., and C. M. Cox. 2001. The influence of gender on the perception and response to investment risk: The case of professional investors. Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets 2 (1):29-36.
45. Owen, C. L., and W. D. Todor. 1993. Attitudes toward women as managers: Still the same. Business Horizons 36 (2):12-16.
46. Peters, L. H., J. R. Terborg, and J. Taynor. 1974. Women as Managers Scale WAMS: A measure of attitudes toward women in management positions. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 4 27.
47. Pillsbury, C., L. Capozzoli, and A. Ciampa. 1989. A synthesis of research studies regarding the upward mobility of women in public accounting. Accounting Horizons 3 (1):63-70.
48. Powell, G. N., and D. A. Butterfield. 1989. The good manager: Did androgyny fare better in the 1980s? Group and Organizational Studies 14: 216-233.
49. Propp, K. M. 1995. An experimental examination of biological sex as a status cue in decision-making groups and its influence on information use. Small Group Research 26: 451-474.
50. Ragins, B. R., and J. L. Cotton. 1993. Gender and willingness to mentor in organizations. Journal of Management 19 (1):97-111.
51. Rudman, L. A. 1998. Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereo-typical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (3):629-645.
52. Rudman, L. A., and P. Glick. 1999. Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (5):1004-1010.
53. Rudman, L. A., P. Glick, and S. E. Kilianski. 2000. Implicit and explicit attitudes toward female authority. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 (11): 1315-1328.
54. Schein, V. E., and R. Mueller. 1992. Sex role stereotyping and requisite management characteristics: A cross-cultural look. Journal of Organizational Behavior 13: 439-447.
55. Schein, V. E., R. Mueller, T. Lituchy, and J. Liu. 1996. Think manager-think male: A global phenomenon? Journal of Organizational Behavior 17: 33-41.
56. Schein, V. E., R. Mueller, T. Lituchy, and J. Liu. 2001. A global look at psychological barriers to women's progress in management. The Journal of Social Issues 57 (4):675-688.
57. Schneider, J., and K. Cook. 1995. Status inconsistency and gender. Small Group Research 26: 372-399.
58. Sundén, A. E., and B. J. Surette. 1998. Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. The American Economic Review 88 (2):207-211.
59. Terborg, J. R., L. H. Peters, D. R. Ilgen, and F. Smith. 1977. Organizational and personal correlates of attitudes toward women as managers. Academy of Management Journal 20 (1):89-100.
60. Trapp, M., R. Hermanson, and D. Turner. 1989. Current perceptions of issues related to women employed in public accounting. Accounting Horizons 3 (1):71-85.
61. Wagner, D. G., and J. Berger. 1997. Sex and interpersonal task behaviors: Status expectations accounts. Sociological Perspectives 40 (1):1-32.
62. Williams, J. E., and D. L. Best. 1990. Measuring Sex Stereotypes: A Multination Study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
63. Young, S. M. 1985. Participative budgeting: The effects of risk aversion and asymmetric information on budgetary slack. Journal of Accounting Research 23 (2):829-842.