Client Inquiry Via Electronic Communication Media: Does the Medium Matter?

Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research

Volumn 8, Issue , 2005, Pages 87-112

  Nöteberg, Anna ^a   Hunton, James E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645849835     PISSN: 14751488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1475-1488(04)08004-4     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Abdel-Khalik A.R., Snowball D.A., and Wragge J.H. The effects of certain internal audit variables on the planning of external audit programs. Accounting Review 58 2 (1983) 215-227
2. Ashton A.H., and Ashton R.H. Sequential belief revision in auditing. Accounting Review 63 4 (1988) 623-641
3. Baltes B.B., Dickson M.W., Sherman M.P., Bauer C.C., and LaGanke J.S. Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 87 1 (2002) 156-179
4. Brown P.R. Independent auditor judgment in the evaluation of internal audit functions. Journal of Accounting Research 21 2 (1983) 444-455
5. Burgoon J.K., Bonito J.A., Bengtsson B., Cederberg C., Lundeberg M., and Allspach L. Interactivity in human-computer interaction: A study of credibility, understanding and influence. Computers in Human Behavior 16 (2000) 553-574
6. Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (1980) 752-766
7. Chaiken S., and Eagly A.H. Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 2 (1983) 241-256
8. Chen S., and Chaiken S. The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In: Chaiken S., and Trope Y. (Eds). Dual-process theories of social psychology (1999), Guildford Press, New York
9. Comunale C.L., Sexton T.R., and Sincich T. Linguistic delivery style, client credibility, and auditor judgment. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research 8 (2005) 61-90
10. Daft R.L., and Lengel R.H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science 32 (1986) 554-571
11. Daft R.L., Lengel R.H., and Klebe Trevino L. Message equivocality media selection and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, September 1987 11 3 (1987) 335-366
12. Dennis A.R., and Kinney S.T. Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research 9 3 (1998) 256-274
13. Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1999). Rethinking media richness: Toward a theory of media synchronicity. Paper presented at the 32nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Maui, Hawaii.
14. Eagly A.H., and Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes (1993), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Fort Worth, TX
15. Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1985). A contrast/surprise model for updating beliefs. Working Paper, University of Chicago.
16. Francis J., and Schipper K. Have financial statements lost their relevance?. Journal of Accounting Research Autumn 37 2 (1999) 319-352
17. Goodwin J. The effects of source integrity and consistency of evidence on auditors' judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 18 2 (1999) 1-16
18. Hirst E., and Koonce L. Audit analytical procedures: A field investigation. Contemporary Accounting Research 13 2 (1996) 457-486
19. Hogarth R.M., and Einhorn H.J. Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology 24 (1992) 1-55
20. Hollingshead A.B., McGrath J.E., and O'Connor K.M. Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Research 24 3 (1993) 307-333
21. Jensen M.C., and Meckling W.H. Theory of the firm: Behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (1976) 305-360
22. Kistler L.H., and Strickland S. Instructional case: Microclone Inc. Issues in Accounting Education 12 2 (1997) 427-434
23. Koonce L., Walker N.R., and Wright W.F. A cognitive characterization of audit analytical review. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 12 Supplement (1993) 57-76
24. Kraut R.E., Galegher J., Fish R., and Chalfonte B. Task requirements and media choice in collaborative writing. Human-Computer Interaction 7 4 (1992) 375-407
25. Matheson K., and Zanna M.P. Persuasion as a function of self-awareness in computer-mediated communication. Social Behavior 4 (1989) 99-111
26. Nöteberg A., Benford T.L., and Hunton J.E. Matching electronic communication media and audit tasks. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 4 (2003) 27-55
27. Petty R.E., and Cacioppo J.T. Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches (1981), W.C. Brown, Dubuque, Iowa
28. Rice R.E. Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness. Organization Science 3 (1992) 457-500
29. Schober M.F., and Brennan S.E. Processes of spoken discourse: The role of the partner. In: Graesser A.C., Gernsbacher M.A., and Goldman S.R. (Eds). Handbook of discourse processes (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 123-164
30. Spires E. Auditors' evaluation of test-of-control strength. The Accounting Review, April 66 2 (1991) 259-276
31. Sproull R.F. A lesson in electronic mail. In: Sproull L., and Kiesler S. (Eds). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization (1991), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 177-184
32. Strauss S.G., and McGrath J.E. Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology 79 (1994) 87-97
33. Suh K.S. Impact of communication medium on task performance and satisfaction: An examination of media-richness theory. Information & Management 35 (1999) 295-312
34. Torrance, M. (2002). Introduction to analysis of variance, from http://www.staffs.ac.uk/personal/sciences/smt15/mt15/rm3/lecture_web/index.htm. Accessed on December 1, 2004.
35. Weisband S., and Atwater L. Evaluating self and others in electronic and face-to-face groups. Journal of Applied Psychology 84 (1999) 632-639