Palaeoheterodont phylogeny, character evolution, diversity and phylogenetic classification: A reflection on methods of analysis

Malacologia

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 307-317

  Hoeh, Walter R ^a   Bogan, Arthur E ^b   Heard, William H ^c   Chapman, Eric G ^d  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF NATURAL SCIENCES   (United States)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

28S; Bayesian phylogenetics; COI; Maximum parsimony; Morphology; Palaeoheterodonta; Phylogenetic classification; Unionoida

Indexed keywords

BIVALVIA; ETHERIIDAE; OSTREIDAE; PALAEOHETERODONTA; UNIONOIDA;

EID: 77149169792     PISSN: 00762997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.4002/040.051.0206     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. ALFARO, M. E. & M. T. HOLDER, 2006, The posterior and the prior in Bayesian phylogenetics. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 37: 19-42.
2. BOGAN, A. E. & W. R. HOEH, 2000, On becoming cemented: evolutionary relationships among the genera in the freshwater bivalve family Etheriidae (Bivalvia: Unionoida). In: E. M. HARPER, J. D. TAYLOR & J. A. CRANE, eds., The evolutionary biology of the Bivalvia. Geological Society, Special Publication, London, 177: 159-168.
3. BRETON, S., H. D. BEAUPRÉ, D. T. STEWART, W. R. HOEH & P. U. BLIER, 2007, The unusual system of doubly uniparental inheritance of mtDNA: isn't one enough? Trends in Genetics, 23: 465-47'.
4. CAMPBELL, D. C., J. M. SERB, J. E. BUHAY, K. J. ROE, R. L. MINTON & C. LYDEARD, 2005, Phylogeny of North American amblemines (Bivalvia, Unionoida): prodigious polyphyly proves pervasive across genera. Invertebrate Biology, 124: 131-164.
5. DE QUEIROZ, A. & J. GATESY, 2007, The supermatrix approach to systematics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22: 34-41.
6. DRISKELL, A. , J. G. BURLEIGH, M. M. MCMAHON, B. C. C. MEARA & M. J. SANDERSON, 2004, Prospects for building the tree of life from large sequence databases. Science, 306: 1172-1174.
7. EDWARDS, A. W F., 1972, Likelihood. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 252 pp.
8. FERNANDEZ, A. A. & M. R. MORRIS, 2007, Sexual selection and trichromatic color vision in primates: statistical support for the preexistingbias hypothesis. American Naturalist, 170: 10-20.
9. GADAGKAR, M., S. ROSENBERG & S. KUMAR, 2005, Inferring species phylogenies from multiple genes: concatenated sequence tree versus consensus gene tree. Journal of Experimental Zoology, Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 340B: 64-74.
10. GRAF, D. L., 2000, The Etheriidae revisited: a phylogenetic analysis of hyriid relationships (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Paleoheterodonta: Unionoida). Occasional Papers of the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, 729: 1-21.
11. GRAF, D. L. & K. S. CUMMMINGS, 2006, Palaeoheterodont diversity (Mollusca: Trigonoida + Unionoida): what we know and what we wish we knew about freshwater mussel evolution. In: R. BIELER, ed., Bivalvia - a look at the branches. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 148: 343-394.
12. GRAF, D. L. & D. Ó FOIGHIL, 2000, The evolution of brooding characters among the freshwater pearly mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionoidea) of North America. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 66: 157-170.
13. GRAYBEAL, A., 1998, Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Systematic Biology, 47: 9-17.
14. HEARD, W. H. & G. W. HANNING, 1978, Anatomical features of Modellnaia siamensis (Mollusca, Bivalvia, Unionidae). Zoologica Scripta, 7: 219-223.
15. HILLIS, D. M., 1998, Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias. Systematic Biology, 47: 3-8.
16. HOEH, W. R., M. B. BLACK, R. GUSTAFSON, A. E. BOGAN, R. A. LUTZ & R. C. VRIJENHOEK, 1998, Testing alternative hypotheses of Neotrigonia (Bivalvia: Trigonioida) phylogenetic relationships using cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 DNA sequences. Malacologia, 40: 267-278.
17. HOEH, W. R., A. E. BOGAN, K. S. CUMMINGS & S. I. GUTTMAN, 2002, Evolutionary relationships among the higher taxa of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida): Inferences on phylogeny and character evolution from analyses of DNA sequence data. Malacological Review, 31/32: 123-141.
18. HOEH, W. R., A. E. BOGAN & W. H. HEARD, 2001, A phylogenetic perspective on the evolution of morphological and reproductive characteristics in the Unionoida. Pp. 257-280, in: G. BAUER & K. WÄCHTLER, eds., Ecology and evolution of the freshwater mussels Unionoida. Ecological Studies, Volume 145. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, xxii + 394 pp.
19. HOEH, W. R., D. T. STEWART, B. W. SUTHERLAND & E. ZOUROS, 1996, Multiple origins of gender-associated mitochondrial DNA lineages in bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Evolution, 50: 2276-2286.
20. HUELSENBECK, J. P., B. LARGET & E. ALFARO, 2004, Bayesian phylogenetic model selection using reversible jump markov chain Monte Carlo. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 21: 1123-1133.
21. HUELSENBECK, J. P. & F. RONQUIST, 2001, MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics, 17: 754-755.
22. KOEPFLI, K-P, K A. DEERE, G. J. SLATER, C. BEGG, K. BEGG, L. GRASSMAN, M. LUCHERINI, G. VERON & R. K WAYNE, 2008, Multigene phylogeny of the Mustelidae: Resolving relationships, tempo and biogeographic history of a mammalian adaptive radiation. BMC Biology, 6: 10.
23. LARKIN, M. A., G. BLACKSHIELDS, N. P. BROWN, R. CHENNA, P. A. MCGETTIGAN, H. MCWILLIAM, F. VALENTIN, I. M. WALLACE, A. WILM, R. LOPEZ, J. D. THOMPSON, T. J. GIBSON & D. G. HIGGINS, 2007, Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics, 23: 2947-2948.
24. LEWIS, P. O., 2001a, A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Systematic Biology, 50: 913-925.
25. LEWIS, P. O., 2001b, Phylogenetic systematics turns over a new leaf. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16: 30-37.
26. LEWIS, P. O., M. T. HOLDER & K E. HOLSINGER, 2005, Polytomies and Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Systematic Biology, 54: 241-253.
27. MADDISON, W. P., 2006, Confounding asymmetries in evolutionary diversification and character change. Evolution, 60: 1743-1746.
28. MADDISON, W P. & D. R. MADDISON, 2008, Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.6.
29. MOCZEK, A. P., T. E. CRUICKSHANK & A. SHELBY, 2006, When ontogeny reveals what phylogeny hides: gain and loss of horns during development and evolution of horned beetles. Evolution, 60: 2329-2341.
30. MOOERS, A. O. & D. SCHLUTER, 1999, Reconstructing ancestor states with maximum likelihood: support for one-and two-rate models. Systematic Biology, 48: 623-633.
31. MURPHY, N. P., D. CAREY, L. R. CASTRO, M. DOWTON & A. D. AUSTIN, 2007, Phylogeny of the platygastroid wasps (Hymenoptera) based on sequences from the 18S rRNA, 28S rRNA and cytochrome oxidase I genes: implications for the evolution of the ovipositor system and host relationships. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 91: 653-669.
32. ORTMANN, A. E., 1912, Notes upon the families and genera of the najades. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 8: 222-365, pls. 18-20.
33. ORTMANN, A. E., 1921, South American naiades; a contribution to the knowledge of the freshwater mussels of South America. Memoirs of the Carnegie Museum, 8: 451-670, pls. 34-48.
34. PAGEL, M., 1994, Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: A general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 255: 37-45.
35. PAGEL, M., 1997, Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zoologica Scripta, 26:331-348.
36. PAGEL, M., 1999, The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states on phylogenies. Systematic Biology, 48: 612-622.
37. PRASHAD, B., 1931, Some noteworthy examples of parallel evolution in the molluscan faunas of South-eastern Asia and South America. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biology, 51: 42-53.
38. RODRIGUEZ, F., J. L. OLIVER, A. MARIN & J. R. MEDINA, 1990, The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 142: 485-501.
39. ROE, K J. & W R. HOEH, 2003, Systematics of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida). Pp. 91-122, in: C. LYDEARD & D. R. LINDBERG, eds., Molecular systematics and phylogeography of mollusks. Smithsonian Books, Washington, xiii + 312 pp.
40. RONQUIST, F. & J. P. HUELSENBECK, 2003, MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19: 1572-1574.
41. RONQUIST, F., J. P. HUELSENBECK & P. VAN DER MARK, 2005, MrBayes 3.1 manual. Online at http://mrbayes.csit.fsu.edu/mb3.1-manual.pdf.
42. SANDERSON, M. J. & A. C. DRISKELL, 2003, The challenge of constructing large phylogenetic trees. Trends in Plant Science, 8: 374-379.
43. SANDERSON, M. J., A. C. DRISKELL, R. H. REE, O. EULENSTEIN & S. LANGLEY, 2003, Obtaining maximal concatenated phylogenetic data sets from large sequence databases. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 20: 1036-1042.
44. SPEARS, T. & L. G. ABELE, 2000, Branchiopod monophyly and interordinal phylogeny inferred from 18s ribosomal DNA. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 20: 1-24.
45. SWOFFORD, D. L, 2002, PAUP z.ast;. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland. (Website: http://paup.csit.fsu.edu/)
46. WALKER, J. M., J. P. CUROLE, D. E. WADE, E. G. CHAPMAN, A. E. BOGAN, G. T. WATTERS & W. R. HOEH, 2006, Taxonomic distribution and phylogenetic utility of gender-associated mitochondrial genomes in the Unionoida (Bivalvia). Malacologia, 48: 265-282.
47. WATTERS, G. T., 2001, The evolution of the Unionacea in North America, and its implica tions for the worldwide fauna. Pp. 281-30, in: G. BAUER & K. WÄCHTLER, eds., Ecology and evolution of the freshwater mussels (Unionoida). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, xxii + 394 pp.
48. WOODWARD, M. F., 1898, On the anatomy of Mulleria dalyi, Smith. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 3: 87-91.