Regioselective reactions on a chiral substrate controlled by the configuration of a chiral catalyst

Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis

Volumn 352, Issue 2-3, 2010, Pages 231-242

  Kumar, Raju Ranjith ^a   Kagana, Henri B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

Author keywords

Asymmetric catalysis; Match mismatch; Regiodivergence; Regioselectivity; Site selection; Steroids

Indexed keywords

EID: 77149133688     PISSN: 16154150     EISSN: 16154169     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/adsc.200900822     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Asymmetric Organic Reactions, Vol. 5, Catalysis, (Ed.: J. D. Morrison), Academic Press, New York, 1985.
2. Asymmetric Catalysis in Organic Synthesis, (Ed.: R. Noyori), Wiley, New York, 1994.
3. nd edn., Wiley-VCH, New York, 2001.
4. Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis, Vols. I-III, (Eds.: E. N. Jacobsen, A. Pfaltz, H. Yamamoto), Springer, Heidelberg, New York, 1999.
5. Stereo-Differentiating Reactions, (Eds.: Y. Izumi, A. Tai), Kodansha, Tokyo and Academic Press, New York, 1977.
6. H. B. Kagan, J. C. Fiaud, in: Topics in Stereochemistry, (Eds.: N. L. Allinger, E. L. Eliel), Wiley, New York, 1988; Vol. 18, pp 249-330.
7. E. Vedejs, M. Jure, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 4040-4069;
8. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3974-4001.
9. A. H. Hoveyda, M. T. Didiuk, Curr. Org. Chem. 1998, 2, 489-526.
10. J. M. Keith, J. F. Larrow, E. N. Jacobsen, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 5-26.
11. [11] For example, multi-step total syntheses of natural products are commonly qualified as enantioselective because the final product has been synthesized as a single enantiomer. The expression " enantioselectivity" will be used in the present article when meaning that an achiral starting material is transformed in one step into an enantioenriched product. Often a given reaction involves several consecutive steps and one is stereodeterminating. We will not use the word "selection" in a mechanistic discussion but only when comparing the starting material to the product (see some examples in Scheme 1).
12. For the misuse of stereochemical words see: a) K. Mislow, Chirality 2002, 14, 126-134;
13. b) E. L. Eliel, S. H. Wilen, L. N. Mander, Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds, Wiley, New York, 1994.
14. J. P. Guetté, A. Horeau, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1967, 1747-1752.
15. S. El Baba, J. C. Poulin, H. B. Kagan, Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 4275-4284.
16. a) C. Bolm, G. Schlingloff, K. Weickhard, Angew. Chem. 1994, 106, 1944-1946;
17. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 1848-1849;
18. b) C. Bolm, G. Schlingloff, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1995, 1247-1248.
19. a) A. Gusso, C. Baccin, F. Pinna, G. Strukul, Organometallics 1994, 13, 3442-3451;
20. b) G. Strukul, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 1256-1267;
21. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1199-1209.
22. A. Watanabe, T. Uchida, K. Ito, T. Katsuki, Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 4481-4485.
23. H. B. Kagan, Croat. Chem. Acta 1996, 69, 669-680.
24. H. B. Kagan, Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 2449-2459.
25. T. Honda, N. Sano, K. Kanai, Heterocycles 1995, 41, 425-429.
26. S. F. Martin, M. R. Spaller, S. Liras, B. Hartmann, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4493-4494.
27. M. P. Doyle, A. B. Dyatkin, A. V. Kalinin, D. A. Ruppar, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 11021-11022.
28. M. S. Visser, A. H. Hoveyda, Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 4383-4394.
29. G. Dawson, C. A. Durrant, G. G. Kirk, R. J. Whitby, R. V. H. Jones, M. C. H. Standen, Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2335-2338.
30. S. Masamune, W. Choy, J. S. Peterson, L. R. Sita, Angew. Chem. 1985, 97, 1-31;
31. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1985, 24, 1-30.
32. A. Horeau, H. B. Kagan, J. P. Vigneron, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1968, 3795-3797.
33. D. L. Hughes, M. Palucki, N. Yasuda, R. A. Reamer, P. J. Reider, J. Org. Chem, 2002, 67, 2762-2768, and references cited therein.
34. T. Hayashi, A. Yamamoto, Y. Ito, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1986, 1090-1092.
35. O. Loiseleur, M. C. Elliott, P. von Matt, A. Pfaltz, Helv. Chim. Acta 2000, 83, 2287-2294.
36. H. Daimon, R. Ogawa, S. Itagaki, I. Shimizu, Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 1222-1223.
37. G. R. Cook, S. Sankaranarayanan, Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3531-3533.
38. O. Jacquet, J. Y. Legros, M. Coliboeuf, J.-C. Fiaud, Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 6530-6536.
39. R. Webster, C. Böig, M. Lautens, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 444-445.
40. [34-36]
41. F. Bertozzi, P. Crotti, F. Macchia, M. Pineschi, B. L. Feringa, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 956-958;
42. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 930-932.
43. M. Pineschi, F. Del Moro, F. Crotti, V. Di Bussolo, F. Macchia, J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2099-2105.
44. a) R. Millet, A. Alexakis, Synlett 2007, 435-438;
45. b) R. Millet, A. Alexakis, Synlett 2008, 1797-1800.
46. A. Gansuer, C.-A. Fan, F. Keller, J. Keil, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3484-3485.
47. M. P. Doyle, A. V. Kalinin, D. G. Ene, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8837-8846.
48. M. P. Doyle, S. B. Davies, E. J. May, J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 8112-8119.
49. C. K. Jana, A. Studer, Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 6662-6664;
50. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6542-6544.
51. K. Tanaka, G. C. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 125, 8078-8079.
52. Y. Chen, L. Deng, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11302-11303.
53. S. Zhang, C. Girard, H. B. Kagan, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6, 2637-2640.
54. C. Bolm, I. Schiffers, C. L. Dinter, L. Defrère, A. Gerlach, C. Raabe, Synthesis 2001, 1719-1730.
55. C. Bolm, I. Schiffers, C. L. Dinter, A. Gerlach, J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 6984-6991.
56. Y. Ishii, K. Osakada, T. Ikariya, M. Saburi, S. Yoshikawa, J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 2034-2039.
57. I. Iwasaki, T. Maki, W. Nakashima, O. Onomura, Y. Matsumura, Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 969-972.
58. C. Mazet, S. Roseblade, V. Köhler, A. Pfaltz, Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1879-1882.
59. C. A. Lewis, S. J. Miller, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 5744-5747;
60. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5616-5619.
61. Y. Zhao, A. W. Mitra, A. H. Hoveyda, M. L. Snapper, Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 8623-8626;
62. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8471-8474.
63. a) M. Tsukamoto, H. B. Kagan, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 453-463;
64. b) M. T. Reetz, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 1391-1394;
65. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1335-1338.
66. M. T. Reetz, M. H. Becker, H. W. Klein, D. Stöckigt, Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 1872-1875;
67. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1758-1761.
68. [54] There is a competition between the C=C epoxidation and the allylic oxidation into enone. The chemoselectivity is slightly different according to the absolute configuration of the substrate.
69. W. Adam, S. Prikhodovski, K. J. Roschmann; C. R. Saha-Möller, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 2677-2681.
70. B. Wu, J. R. Parquette, T. V. RajanBabu, Science 2009, 326, 1662.