Concentration and crowding effects on protein stability from a coarse-grained model

Statistical Mechanics of Cellular Systems and Processes

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-25

  Cheung, Jason K ^a   Shen, Vincent K ^b   Errington, Jeffrey R ^c   Truskett, Thomas M ^d  

^a Biological and Sterile Product Development Schering Plough Research Institute   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c the State University of New York   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77049090450     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511576768.002     Document Type: Chapter

References (105)

1. Privalov, P. L., 1979. Stability of proteins: small globular proteins. Adv. Protein Chem.33:167–241.
2. Schellman, J. A., 1987. The thermodynamic stability of proteins. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem.16:115–137.
3. Privalov, P. L., and S. J. Gill, 1988. Stability of protein structure and hydrophobic interaction. Adv. Prot. Chem.39:191–234.
4. Chalikian, T. V., 2003. Volumetric properties of proteins. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct.32:207–235.
5. Dill, K. A., S. Bromberg, K. Z. Yue, et al. 1995. Principles of protein folding: a perspective from simple exact models. Prot. Sci.4:561–602.
6. Shea, J., and C. L. Brooks, 2001. From folding theories to folding proteins: a review and assessment of simulation studies of protein folding and unfolding. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem.52:499–535.
7. Mirny, L., and E. Shakhnovich, 2001. Protein folding theory: from lattice to all atom models. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct.30:361–396.
8. Snow, C. D., H. Nguyen, V. S. Pande, and M. Gruebele, 2002. Absolute comparison of simulated and experimental protein-folding dynamics. Nature420:102–106.
9. Pande, V. S., I. Baker, J. Chapman, et al. 2002. Atomistic protein folding simulations on the submillisecond time scale using worldwide distributed computing. Biopolymers68:91–109.
10. Garcia, A. E., and J. N. Onuchic, 2003. Folding a protein in a computer: an atomic description of the folding/unfolding of protein A. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100:13 898–13 903.
11. Herges, T., and W. Wenzel, 2004. An all-atom force field for tertiary structure prediction of helical proteins. Biophys. J.87:3100–3109.
12. Chu, J.W., S. Izvekov, and G. A. Voth, 2006. The multiscale challenge for biomolecular systems: coarse-grained modeling. Mol. Sim.32:211–218.
13. Goodsell, D. S., 1991. Inside a living cell. Trends Biochem. Sci.16:203–206.
14. Luby-Phelps, K., 2000. Cytoarchitecture and physical properties of cytoplasm: Volume viscosity, diffusion, intracellular surface area. Int. Rev. Cytol.192: 189–221.
15. Shire, S. J., Z. Shahrokh, and J. Liu, 2004. Challenges in the development of high protein concentration formulations. J. Pharm. Sci.93:1390–1402.
16. Cheung, J. K., and T. M. Truskett, 2005. Coarse-grained strategy for modeling protein stability in concentrated solutions. Biophys. J.89:2372–2384.
17. Shen, V. K., J. K. Cheung, J. R. Errington, and T. M. Truskett, 2006. Coarse-grained strategy for modeling protein stability in solution II: Phase behavior. Biophys. J.90:1949–1960.
18. Cheung, J. K., V. K. Shen, J. R. Errington, and T. M. Truskett, 2007. Coarse-grained strategy for modeling protein stability in solution III: Directional protein interactions. Biophys. J.92:4316–4324.
19. Hawley, S. A., 1971. Reversible pressure–temperature denaturation of chymotrypsinogen. Biochemistry10:2436–2442.
20. Privalov, P. L., 1990. Cold denaturation of proteins. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.25:281–305.
21. Smeller, L., 2002. Pressure–temperature phase diagrams of biomolecules. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1595:11–29.
22. Meersman, F., L. Smeller, and K. Heremans, 2002. Comparative fourier transform infrared spectroscopy study of cold-, pressure-, and heat-induced unfolding and aggregation of myoglobin. Biophys. J.82:2635–2644.
23. Silva, J. L., D. Foguel, and C. A. Royer, 2001. Pressure provides new insights into protein folding, dynamics, and structure. Trends Biochem. Sci.26:612–618.
24. Scharngl, C., M. Reif, and J. Friedrich, 2005. Stability of proteins: temperature, pressure, and the role of solvent. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1749:187–213.
25. Dill, K. A., 1990. Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry29:7133–7155.
26. Kauzmann, W., 1959. Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. Adv. Prot. Chem.14:1–63.
27. Tanford, C., 1962. Contribution of hydrophobic interactions to the stability of the globular conformation of proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc.84:4240–4247.
28. Meirovitch, H., and H. A. Scheraga, 1980. Empirical studies of hydrophobicity II: Distribution of the hydrophobic, hydrophilic, neutral, and ambivalent amino acids in the interior and exterior layers of native proteins. Macromolecules13: 1406–1414.
29. Schellman, J. A., 1997. Temperature, stability, and the hydrophobic interaction. Biophys. J.73:2960–2964.
30. Curtis, R. A., C. Steinbrecher, A. Heinemann, H.W. Blanch, and J. M. Prausnitz, 2002. Hydrophobic forces between protein molecules in aqueous solutions of concentrated electrolyte. Biophys. Chem.98:249–265.
31. Calamai, M., N. Taddei, M. Stefani, G. Ramponi, and F. Chiti, 2003. Relative influence of hydrophobicity and net charge in the aggregation of two homologous proteins. Biochemistry 42:15 078–15 083.
32. Moelbert, S., B. Normand, and P. De Los Rios, 2004. Solvent-induced micelle formation in a hydrophobic interaction model. Phys. Rev. E69:061924/1–061924/11.
33. Nozaki, Y., and C. Tanford, 1971. The solubility of amino acids and two glycine peptides in aqueous ethanol and dioxane solutions: establishment of a hydrophobicity scale. J. Biol. Chem.1971:2211–2217.
34. Dill, K. A., D. O. V. Alonso, and K. Hutchinson, 1989. Thermal stability of globular proteins. Biochemistry28:5439–5449.
35. Alonso, D. O. V., and K. A. Dill, 1991. Solvent denaturation and stabilization of globular proteins. Biochemistry20:5974–5985.
36. Wallace, D. G., and K. A. Dill, 1996. Treating sequence dependence of protein stability in a mean-field model. Biopolymers39:115–127.
37. Pande, V. S., A. Y. Grosberg, and T. Tanaka, 2000. Heteropolymer freezing and design: towards physical models of protein folding. Rev. Mod. Phys.72: 259–314.
38. Dill, K. A., 1985. Theory for the folding and stability of globular proteins. Biochemistry24:1501–1509.
39. Cheung, J. K., P. Shah, and T. M. Truskett, 2006. Heteropolymer collapse theory for protein folding in the pressure–temperature plane. Biophys. J.91: 2427–2435.
40. ten Wolde, P. R., and D. Frenkel, 1997. Enhancement of protein crystal nucleation by critical density fluctuations. Science277:1975–1978.
41. Petsev, D. N., X. Wu, O. Galkin, and P. G. Vekilov, 2003. Thermodynamic functions of concentrated protein solutions from phase equilibria. J. Phys. Chem. B107:3921–3926.
42. Hloucha, M., J. F. M. Lodge, A. M. Lenhoff, and S. I. Sandler, 2001. A patch–antipatch representation of specific protein interactions. J. Crystal Growth232:195–203.
43. Shen, M., F. Davis, and A. Sali, 2005. The optimal size of a globular protein domain: A simple sphere-packing model. Chem. Phys. Lett.405:224–228.
44. Shiryayev, A., X. Li, and J. D. Gunton, 2006. Simple model of sickle hemoglobin. J. Chem. Phys.125:024902/1–024902/8.
45. Sear, R. P., 1999. Phase behavior of a simple model of globular proteins. J. Chem. Phys.111:4800–4806.
46. Lomakin, A., N. Asherie, and G. B. M. Benedek, 1999. Aeolotopic interactions of globular proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA96:9465–9468.
47. Curtis, R. A., H.W. Blanch, and J. M. Prausnitz, 2001. Calculation of phase diagrams for aqueous protein solutions. J. Phys. Chem. B105:2445–2452.
48. Song, X., 2002. Role of anisotropic interactions in protein crystallization. Phys. Rev. E66:011909/1–011909/4.
49. Dixit, N. M., and C. F. Zukoski, 2002. Crystal nucleation rates for particles experiencing anisotropic interactions. J. Chem. Phys.117:8540–8550.
50. Kern, N., and D. Frenkel, 2003. Fluid–fluid coexistence in colloidal systems with short-ranged strongly directional attraction. J. Chem. Phys.118:9882–9889.
51. Sandler, S. I., 1999. Chemical and Engineering Thermodynamics, 3rd edn. New York: John Wiley.
52. Errington, J. R., 2003. Direct calculations of liquid–vapor phase equilibria from transition matrix Monte Carlo simulations. J. Chem. Phys.118:9915–9925.
53. Singh, J. K., D. A. Kofke, and J. R. Errington, 2003. Surface tension and vapor–liquid phase coexistence of the square-well fluid. J. Chem. Phys.119:3405–3412.
54. Shen, V. K., and J. R. Errington, 2004. Metastability and instability in the Lennard–Jones investigated via transition-matrix Monte Carlo. J. Phys. Chem. B108: 19595–19606.
55. Singh, J. K., and D. A. Kofke, 2004. Molecular simulation study of effect of molecular association on vapor–liquid interfacial properties. J. Chem. Phys.121:9574–9580.
56. Shen, V. K., and J. R. Errington, 2005. Determination of fluid-phase behavior using transition-matrix Monte Carlo: binary Lennard–Jones mixtures. J. Chem. Phys.122:064508/1–064508/17.
57. Errington, J. R., and V. K. Shen, 2005. Direct evaluation of multi-component phase equilibria using flat histogram methods. J. Chem. Phys.123:164103/1–164103/9.
58. Singh, J. K., and J. R. Errington, 2006. Calculation of phase coexistence properties and surface tensions of n-alkanes with grand-canonical transition matrix Monte Carlo simulation and finite-size scaling. J. Phys. Chem. B110:1369–1376.
59. Singh, J. K., J. Adhikari, and S. K. Kwak, 2006. Vapor–liquid phase coexistence for Morse fluids. Fluid Phase Equilibria248:1–6.
60. Errington, J. R., T. M. Truskett, and J. Mittal, 2006. Excess-entropy-based anomalies for a waterlike fluid. J. Chem. Phys.125:244502/1–244502/8.
61. Mittal, J., J. R. Errington, and T. M. Truskett, 2006. Thermodynamics predicts how confinement modifies the dynamics of the equilibrium hard-sphere fluid. Phys. Rev. Lett.96:177804/1–177804/4.
62. Macdowell, L. G., V. K. Shen, and J. R. Errington, 2006. Nucleation and caviation in spherical, cylindrical, and slablike droplets and bubbles in small systems. J. Chem. Phys.125:034705/1–034705/15.
63. Errington, J. R., 2003. Evaluating surface tension using grand-canonical transition-matrix Monte Carlo simulation and finite-size scaling. Phys. Rev. E67:012102.
64. Shen, V. K., and J. R. Errington, 2006. Determination of surface tension in binary mixtures using transition-matrix Monte Carlo. J. Chem. Phys.124:024721/1–024721/9.
65. Shen, V., R. D. Mountain, and J. R. Errington, 2007. Comparative study of the effect of tail corrections on surface tension determined by molecular simulation. J. Phys. Chem. B111:6198–6207.
66. Cichowski, E. C., T. R. Schmidt, and J. R. Errington, 2005. Determination of Henry’s law constants through transition matrix Monte Carlo simulation. Fluid Phase Equilibria236:58–65.
67. Errington, J. R., and D.W. Wilbert, 2005. Prewetting boundary tensions from Monte Carlo simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett.95:226107/1–226107/4.
68. Errington, J. R., 2004. Prewetting transitions for a model argon on solid carbon dioxide system. Langmuir20:3798–3804.
69. Chen, H., and D. S. Sholl, 2006. Efficient simulation of binary adsorption isotherms using transition matrix Monte Carlo. Langmuir22:709–716
70. Chen, H., and D. S. Sholl, 2007. Examining the accuracy of ideal adsorbed solution theory without curve-fitting using transition matrix Monte Carlo simulations. Langmuir23:6431–6437.
71. Smith, G. R., and A. D. Bruce, 1995. A study of the multi-canonical Monte Carlo method. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.28:6623–6643.
72. Wang, J.-S., T. K. Tay, and R. H. Swendsen, 1999. Transition matrix Monte Carlo reweighting dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett.82:476–479.
73. Wang, J.-S., and R. H. Swendsen, 2002. Transition matrix Monte Carlo method. J. Stat. Phys.106:245–285.
74. Fitzgerald, M., R. R. Picard, and R. N. Silver, 1999. Canonical transition probabilities for adaptive metropolis simulation. Europhys. Lett.46:282–287.
75. Fitzgerald, M., R. R. Picard, and R. N. Silver, 2000. Monte Carlo transition dynamics and variance reduction. J. Stat. Phys.98:321–345.
76. Ferrenberg, A. M., and R. H. Swendsen, 1988. New Monte Carlo technique for studying phase transitions. Phys. Rev. Lett.61:2635–2638.
77. Van Workum, K., and J. F. Douglas, 2005. Equilibrium polymerization in the Stockmayer fluid as a model of supermolecular self-organization. Phys. Rev. E71:031502/1–031502/15.
78. Chen, B., and J. I. Siepmann, 2000. A novel Monte Carlo algorithm for simulating strongly associate fluids: applications for water, hydrogen fluoride, and acetic acid. J. Phys. Chem. B104:8725–8734.
79. Chen, B., and J. I. Siepmann, 2001. Improving the efficiency of the aggregation-volume-bias Monte Carlo. J. Phys. Chem. B105:11275–11282.
80. Chen, B., J. I. Siepmann, K. J. Oh, and M. L. Klein, 2001. Aggregation-volume-bias Monte Carlo simulations of vapor–liquid nucleation barriers for Lennard–Jonesium. J. Chem. Phys.115:10903–10913.
81. Vlugt, T. J. H., M. G. Martin, B. Smit, J. I. Siepmann, and R. Krishna, 1998. Improving the efficiency of the configurational-bias Monte Carlo algorithm. Mol. Phys.94:727–733.
82. Frenkel, D., and B. Smit, 2002. Understanding Molecular Simulations: From Algorithms to Applications, 2nd edn. London: Academic Press.
83. Steinhardt, P. J., D. R. Nelson, and M. Ronchetti, 1983. Bond-orientational order in liquids and glasses. Phys. Rev. B28:784–805.
84. Torquato, S., T. M. Truskett, and P. G. Debenedetti, 2000. Is random close packing of sphere well defined? Phys. Rev. Lett.84:2064–2067.
85. ruskett, T. M., S. Torquato, and P. G. Debenedetti, 2000. Towards a quantification of disorder in materials: distinguishing equilibrium and glassy sphere packings. Phys. Rev. E62:993–1001.
86. Errington, J. R., P. G. Debenedetti, and S. Torquato, 2003. Quantification of order in the Lennard–Jones system. J. Chem. Phys.118:2256–2263.
87. Harn, N., C. Allan, C. Oliver, and C. R. Middaugh, 2007. Highly concentrated monoclonal antibody solutions: direct analysis of physical structure and thermal stability. J. Pharm. Sci.96:532–546.
88. Tomicki, P., R. L. Jackman, and D.W. Stanley, 1996. Thermal stability of metmyoglobin in a model system. Lebensm.-Wiss. u.-Technol.29:547–551.
89. Iametti, S., B. D. Gregori, G. Vecchio, and F. Bonomi, 1996. Modifications occur at different structural levels during the heat denaturation of β-lactoglobulin. Eur. J. Biochem.237:106–112.
90. Hamada, D., and C. M. Dobson, 2002. A kinetic study of β-lactoglobulin amyloid fibril formation promoted by urea. Prot. Sci.11:2417–2426.
91. Park, C., and R. T. Raines, 2000. Dimer formation by a “monomeric” protein. Prot. Sci.9:2026–2033.
92. Gotte, G., F. Vottariello, and M. Libonati, 2003. Thermal aggregation of ribonuclease A. J. Biol. Chem.278:10763–10769.
93. Libonati, M., and G. Gotte, 2004. Oligomerization of bovine ribonuclease A: Structural and functional features of its multimers. Biochem. J.380:311–327.
94. Liu, Y., and D. Eisenberg, 2002. 3D domain swapping: As domains continue to swap. Prot. Sci.11:1285–1299.
95. Ferrone, F. A., 2004. Polymerization and sickle cell disease: a molecular view. Microcirculation11:115–128.
96. Vaiana, S. M., M. A. Rotter, A. Emanuele, F. A. Ferrone, and M. B. Palma-Vittorelli, 2005. Effect of T-R conformational change on sickle-cell hemoglobin interactions and aggregation. Proteins58:426–438.
97. Johnson, C. R., and E. Freire, 1996. Structural stability of small oligomeric proteins. Techn. Prot. Chem.7:459–467.
98. Kendrick, B. S., T. Li, and B. S. Chang, 2002. In Rational Design of Stable Protein Formulations, pp. 61–83. New York: Plenum Press.
99. Hou, L., F. Lanni, and K. Luby-Phelps, 1990. Tracer diffusion in F-actin and ficoll mixtures: toward a model for cytoplasm. Biophys. J.58:31–43.
100. Wang, W., 1999. Instability, stabilization, and formulation of liquid protein pharmaceuticals. Int. J. Pharmaceut.185:129–188.
101. Zimmermann, S. B., and A. P. Minton, 1993. Macromolecular crowding: biochemical, biophysical and physiological consequences. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct.22:27–65.
102. Minton, A. P., 1998. Molecular crowding: analysis of effects of high concentrations of inert cosolutes on biochemical equilibria and rates in terms of volume exclusion. Meth. Enzymol.295:127–149.
103. Hall, D., and A. P. Minton, 2002. Effects of inert volume-excluding macromolecules on protein fiber formation I: Equilibrium models. Biophys. Chem.98:93–104.
104. Sasahara, K., P. McPhie, and A. P. Minton, 2003. Effect of dextran on protein stability and conformation attributed to macromolecular crowding. J. Mol. Biol.326:1227–1237.
105. O’Connor, T. F., P. G. Debenedetti, and J. D. Carbeck. 2004. Simultaneous determination of structural and thermodynamic effects of carbohydrate solutes on the thermal stability of ribonuclease A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:11794–11795.