We do not need a Sexual Selection 2.0-nor a theory of Genial Selection

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Clutton Brock, Tim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; SEXUAL SELECTION;

EID: 76449100300     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.10.018     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Alexander R.D., Hoogland J.L., Howard R.D., Noonan K.M., and Sherman P.W. Sexual dimorphisms and breeding systems in pinnipeds, ungulates, primates and humans. In: Chapman N.A., and Irons W. (Eds). Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: an Anthropological Perspective (1979), Duxbury Press, North Scituate, Massachusetts 402-435
2. Amundsen T. Female ornaments: genetically correlated or sexually selected?. In: Espmark Y., Amundsen T., and Rosenqvist G. (Eds). Animal Signals: Signalling and Signal Design in Animal Communication (2000), Tapic Academic Press, Trondheim 133-154
3. Amundsen T. Why are female birds ornamented?. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15 (2000) 149-155
4. Amundsen T., and Forsgren E. Male mate choice selects for female coloration in a fish. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 98 (2001) 13155-13160
5. Andersson M. Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299 (1982) 818-820
6. Andersson M. Sexual Selection (1994), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
7. Andersson M. Social polyandry, parental investment, sexual selection and evolution of reduced female gamete size. Evolution 58 (2004) 24-34
8. Bateman A.J. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2 (1948) 349-368
9. Becher S.A., and Magurran A.E. Multiple mating and reproductive skew in Trinidadian guppies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 271 (2004) 1009-1014
10. Berglund A., and Rosenqvist G. Sex role reversal in pipefish. Advances in the Study of Behavior 32 (2003) 131-167
11. Borgia G. Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. In: Blum M.S., and Blum N. (Eds). Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (1979), Academic Press, New York 19-80
12. Campbell B. Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871-1971 (1972), Aldine-Atherton, Chicago
13. Caro T.M. Human breasts: unsupported hypotheses reviewed. Human Evolution 2 (1987) 271-282
14. Caro T.M., and Sellen D.W. The reproductive advantage of fat in women. Ethology and Sociobiology 11 (1990) 51-66
15. Clutton-Brock T.H. Selection in relation to sex. In: Bendall B.J. (Ed). Evolution from Molecules to Men (1983), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 457-481
16. Clutton-Brock T.H. Reproductive success. In: Clutton-Brock T.H. (Ed). Reproductive Success (1988), University of Chicago Press, Chicago 472-486
17. Clutton-Brock T.H. What is sexual selection?. In: Kappeler P.M., and van Schaik C.P. (Eds). Sexual Selection in Primates: New and Comparative Perspectives (2004), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 24-36
18. Clutton-Brock T.H. Sexual selection in males and females. Science 318 (2007) 1882-1885
19. Clutton-Brock T.H. Sexual selection in females. Animal Behaviour 77 (2009) 3-11
20. Clutton-Brock T.H., and Harvey P.H. Evolutionary rules and primate societies. In: Bateson P.P.G., and Hinde R.A. (Eds). Growing Points in Ethology (1976), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 195-237
21. Clutton-Brock T.H., and Parker G.A. Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Quarterly Review of Biology 67 (1992) 437-456
22. Clutton-Brock T.H., Harvey P.H., and Rudder B. Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates. Nature 269 (1977) 797-800
23. Clutton-Brock T.H., Albon S.D., Gibson R.M., and Guinness F.E. The logical stag: adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Animal Behaviour 27 (1979) 211-225
24. Clutton-Brock T.H., Albon S.D., and Harvey P.H. Antlers, body-size and breeding group size in the Cervidae. Nature 285 (1980) 565-567
25. Clutton-Brock T.H., Albon S.D., and Guinness F.E. Reproductive success in male and female red deer. In: Clutton-Brock T.H. (Ed). Reproductive Success (1988), University of Chicago Press, Chicago 325-343
26. Conner J. Field measurements of natural and sexual selection in the fungus beetle Bolitotherus cornutus. Evolution 42 (1988) 736-749
27. Davies N.B., and Hatchwell B.J. The value of male parental care and its influence on reproductive allocation by male and female dunnocks. Journal of Animal Ecology 61 (1992) 259-272
28. Davies N.B., Hartley I.R., Hatchwell B.J., and Langmore N.E. Female control of copulations to maximize male help: a comparison of polygynandrous alpine accentors, Prunella collaris, and dunnocks, P. modularis. Animal Behaviour 51 (1996) 27-47
29. Davison G.W.H. Avian spurs. Journal of Zoology 206 (1985) 353-366
30. Domb L.G., and Pagel M. Sexual swellings advertise female quality in wild baboons. Nature 410 (2001) 204-206
31. Eberhard N.G. The function of horns in Podischnus agenor (Dynastinae) and other beetles. In: Blum M.S., and Blum N.A. (Eds). Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (1979), Academic Press, New York 231-258
32. Erckmann W.J. The evolution of polyandry in shorebirds: an evaluation of hypotheses. In: Wasser S.K. (Ed). Social Behaviour of Female Vertebrates (1983), Academic Press, New York 114-168
33. Gowaty P.A. Sex roles, contests for the control of reproduction and sexual selection. In: Kappeler P. (Ed). Sexual Selection in Primates (2004), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 37-54
34. Griggio M., Valera F., Casas A., and Pilastro A. Males prefer ornamented females: a field experiment of male choice in the rock sparrow. Animal Behaviour 69 (2005) 1243-1250
35. Harcourt A.H., Harvey P.H., Larson S.G., and Short R.V. Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates. Nature 293 (1981) 55-57
36. Harvey P.H., Kavanagh M., and Clutton-Brock T.H. Canine tooth size in female primates. Nature 276 (1978) 817-818
37. Heinsohn R., Legge S., and Endler J.A. Extreme reversed sexual dichromatism in a bird without sex role reversal. Science 309 (2005) 617-619
38. Herdman E.J.E., Kelly C.D., and Godin J.-G.J. Male mate choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): do males prefer larger females as mates?. Ethology 110 (2004) 97-111
39. Hoglund J., Eriksson M., and Lindell L.E. Females of the lek-breeding great snipe Gallinago media prefer males with white tails. Animal Behaviour 40 (1990) 23-32
40. Holekamp K.E., Smale L., and Szykman M. Rank and reproduction in the female spotted hyaena. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 108 (1996) 229-237
41. Houde A.E. Sex roles, ornaments, and evolutionary explanation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 98 (2001) 12857-12859
42. Jones A.G., Rosenqvist G., Berglund A., Arnold S.J., and Avise J.C. The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-rolereversed pipefish. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 267 (2000) 677-680
43. Jones A.G., Arguello J.R., and Arnold S.J. Validation of Bateman's principles: a genetic study of mating patterns and sexual selection in newts. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 269 (2002) 2533-2539
44. Kappeler P., and van Schaik C. Sexual Selection in Primates (2004), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
45. Kavanagh E.E. Debating sexual selection and mating strategies. Science 312 (2006) 689-697
46. Kokko H., Johnstone R.A., and Clutton-Brock T.H. The evolution of cooperative breeding through group augmentation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 268 (2001) 187-196
47. Kruuk L.E.B., Clutton-Brock T.H., Slate J., Pemberton J.M., Brotherstone S., and Guinness F.E. Heritability of fitness in a wild mammal population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 97 (2000) 698-703
48. Kruuk L.E.B., Slate J., Pemberton J.M., Brotherstone S., Guinness F.E., and Clutton-Brock T.H. Antler size in red deer: heritability and selection but no evolution. Evolution 56 (2002) 1683-1695
49. Kvarnemo C., and Simmons L.W. Variance in female quality, operational sex ratio and male mate choice in a bush cricket. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 45 (1999) 245-252
50. Le Boeuf B.J. Male-male competition and reproductive success in elephant seals. American Zoologist 14 (1974) 163-176
51. Le Boeuf B.J., and Reiter J. Lifetime reproductive success in northern elephant seals. In: Clutton-Brock T.H. (Ed). Reproductive Success (1988), University of Chicago Press, Chicago 344-362
52. LeBas N.R. Female finery is not for males. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21 (2006) 170-173
53. LeBas N.R., Hockham L.R., and Ritchie M.G. Nonlinear and correlational sexual selection on 'honest' female ornamentation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 270 (2003) 2159-2165
54. Lorch P.D. Understanding reversals in the relative strength of sexual selection on males and females: a role for sperm competition?. American Naturalist 159 (2002) 645-657
55. Lorch P.D. Using upper limits of 'Bateman gradients' to estimate the opportunity for sexual selection. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45 (2005) 924-930
56. Lorch P.D., Bussiere L.F., and Gwynne D.T. Quantifying the potential for sexual dimorphism using upper limits on Bateman gradients. Behaviour 145 (2008) 1-24
57. Loyau A., Saint Jalme M., Cagmant C., and Sorci G. Multiple sexual advertisements honestly reflect health status in peacocks (Pavo cristatus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 58 (2005) 552-557
58. Loyau A., Saint Jalme M., and Sorci G. Intra and intersexual selection for multiple traits in the peacock (Pavo cristatus). Ethology 111 (2005) 810-820
59. Loyau A., Gomez D., Moureau B., Thery M., Hart N.S., Saint Jalme M., Bennett A.T.D., and Sorci G. Iridescent structurally based coloration of eyespots correlates with mating success in the peacock. Behavioral Ecology 18 (2007) 1123-1131 10.1093/beheco/arm088
60. Loyau A., Petrie M., Saint Jalme M., and Sorci G. Do peahens not prefer peacocks with more elaborate trains?. Animal Behaviour 76 (2008) E5-E9
61. McLennan D.A. Male mate choice based upon female nuptial coloration in the brook stickleback, Culaea inconstans (Kirtland). Animal Behaviour 50 (1995) 213-221
62. Miller C.W., and Moore A.J. A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274 (2007) 1279-1286
63. Mills S.C., Grapputo A., Koskela E., and Mappes T. Quantitative measures of sexual selection with respect to the operational sex ratio: a comparison of selection indices. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274 (2007) 143-150
64. Moore A.J., Haynes K.F., Preziosi R.F., and Moore P.J. The evolution of interacting phenotypes: genetics and evolution of social dominance. American Naturalist 160 (2002) S186-S197
65. Parker G.A. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Blum M.S., and Blum N.A. (Eds). Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (1979), Academic Press, New York 123-166
66. Parker G.A. Sexual conflict over mating and fertilisation: an overview. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 361 (2006) 235-259
67. Petrie M., Halliday T.R., and Sanders C. Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains. Animal Behaviour 41 (1991) 323-331
68. Pizzari T., and Snook R.R. Perspective: sexual selection and sexual conflict: chasing away paradigm shifts. Evolution 57 (2003) 1223-1236
69. Pizzari T., and Snook R.R. Sexual selection and sexual conflict: measuring sexually antagonistic coevolution. Evolution 58 (2004) 416-420
70. Pizzari T., Cornwallis C.K., Lovlie H., Jakobsson S., and Birkhead T.R. Sophisticated sperm allocation in a bird. Nature 426 (2003) 70-74
71. van Rhijn J.G. The Ruff: Individuality in a Gregarious Wading Bird (1991), T. & A.D. Poyser, London
72. Rios-Cardenas O. Patterns of parental investment and sexual selection in teleost fishes: do they support Bateman's principles?. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45 (2005) 885-894
73. Roughgarden J. The Genial Gene: Deconstructing Darwinian Selfishness (2009), University of California Press, San Francisco
74. Roughgarden J., and Akçay E. Do we need a Sexual Selection 2.0?. Animal Behaviour 79 3 (2010) e1-e4
75. Roughgarden J., Oishi M., and Akçay E. Reproductive social behavior: cooperative games to replace sexual selection. Science 311 (2006) 965-969
76. Rubinstein, R. & Lovette, I. J. In press. Pervasive sexual selection on females in social species. Nature.
77. Ruse M. Review of the Genial Gene. Toronto Globe and Mail (12 September 2009). http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/genetic-generosity/article1289296/
78. Shuster S.M., and Wade M.J. Mating Systems and Strategies (2003), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
79. Simmons L.W. Relative parental investment, potential reproductive roles and the control of sexual selection in katydids. American Naturalist 145 (1995) 797-808
80. Snyder B., and Gowaty P.A. A reappraisal of Bateman's classic study of intrasexual selection. Evolution 61 (2007) 2457-2468
81. Tanaka Y. Social selection and the evolution of animal signals. Evolution 50 (1996) 512-523
82. Tang-Martinez Z., and Ryder T.B. The problem with paradigms: Bateman's world view as a case study. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45 (2005) 821-830
83. Trivers R.L. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B. (Ed). Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971 (1972), Aldine-Atherton, Chicago 136-179
84. Wade M.J., and Arnold S.J. The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male behaviour, female choice and sperm precedence. Animal Behaviour 28 (1980) 446-461
85. Webster M.S., Tarvin K.A., Tuttle E.M., and Pruett-Jones S.G. Promiscuity drives sexual selection in a socially monogamous bird. Evolution 61 (2007) 2205-2211
86. West-Eberhard M.J. The evolution of social behaviour by kin selection. Quarterly Review of Biology 50 (1975) 1-35
87. West-Eberhard M.J. Sexual selection, social competition and evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 123 (1979) 222-234
88. West-Eberhard M.J. Sexual selection, social competition and speciation. Quarterly Review of Biology 55 (1983) 155-183
89. Wilkinson G.S., and Dodson G.N. Function and evolution of antlers and eye stalks in flies. In: Choe J.C., and Crespi B.J. (Eds). Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids (1997), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 310-328
90. Wong B.B.M., and Jennions M.D. Costs influence male mate choice in a freshwater fish. Biology Letters 270 (2003) 36-38
91. Wright D., Kerje S., Brandstrom H., Schutz K., Kindmark A., Andersson L., Jensen P., and Pizzari T. The genetic architecture of a female sexual ornament. Evolution 62 (2008) 86-98
92. Yasmin S., and Yahya H.S.A. Correlates of mating success in Indian peafowl. Auk 113 (1996) 490-492
93. Zinner D., Nunn C., van Schaik C.P., and Kappeler P.M. Sexual selection and exaggerated sexual swellings of female primates. In: Kappeler P.M., and van Schaik C.P. (Eds). Sexual Selection in Primates (2004), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 71-89