Validation of Bateman's principles: A genetic study of sexual selection and mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 269, Issue 1509, 2002, Pages 2533-2539

  Jones, Adam G ^a,b   Arguello, J Roman ^a   Arnold, Stevan J ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bateman gradient; Mating system; Microsatellites; Parentage; Paternity; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

AMPHIBIAN; MATING SUCCESS; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY SIZE; FEMALE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; MALE; MATING SYSTEM; NEWT; NONHUMAN; PATERNITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL SELECTION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

AMPHIBIA; SALAMANDRIDAE; TARICHA; TARICHA GRANULOSA;

EID: 0037160245     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2177     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Andersson, M. 1994 Sexual selection. Princeton University Press.
2. Arnold, S. J. 1986 Limits on stabilizing, disruptive and correlational selection set by the opportunity for selection. Am. Nat. 128, 143-146.
3. Arnold, S. J. 1994 Bateman's principles and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals. Am. Nat. 144, S126-S149.
4. Arnold, S. J. & Duvall, D. 1994 Animal mating systems: a synthesis based on selection theory. Am. Nat. 143, 317-348.
5. Arnold, S. J. & Wade, M. J. 1984a On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38, 709-719.
6. Arnold, S. J. & Wade, M. J. 1984b On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications. Evolution 38, 720-734.
7. Bateman, A. J. 1948 Intrasexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2, 349-368.
8. Berglund, A., Rosenqvist, G. & Svensson, I. 1986 Mate choice, fecundity and sexual dimorphism in two pipefish species (Syngnathidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19, 301-307.
9. Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1983 Selection in relation to sex. In Evolution from molecules to men (ed. D. S. Bendall), pp. 457-481. Cambridge University Press.
10. Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1988 Reproductive success. In Reproductive success (ed. T. H. Clutton-Brock), pp. 472-485. University of Chicago Press.
11. Clutton-Brock, T. H. & Parker, G. A. 1992 Potential reproductive tares and the operation of sexual selection. Q. Rev. Biol. 67, 437-456.
12. Clutton-Brock, T. H. & Vincent, A. C. J. 1991 Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females, Nature 351, 58-60.
13. Crow, J. F. 1958 Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man. Hum. Biol. 30, 1-13.
14. Darwin, C. 1871 The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.
15. Emlen, S. T. & Oring, L. W. 1977 Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197, 215-223.
16. Fairbaim, D. J. & Wilby, A. E. 2001 Inequality of opportunity: measuring the potential for sexual selection. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3, 667-686.
17. Garant, D., Dodson, J. J. & Bernatchez, L. 2001 A genetic evaluation of mating system and determinants of individual reproductive success in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). J. Heredity 92, 137-145.
18. Grafen, A. 1987 Measuring sexual selection: why bother? In Sexual selection: testing the alternatives (ed. J. W. Bradbury & M. B. Andersson), pp. 221-233. Chichester: Wiley.
19. Grafen, A. 1988 On the uses of data on lifetime reproductive success. In Reproductive success (ed. T. H. Clutton-Brock), pp. 454-471. University of Chicago Press.
20. Green, R. H. 1966 Measurement of non-randomness in spatial distributions. Res. Pop. Ecol. 8, 1-7.
21. Hubbell, S. P. & Johnson, L. K. 1987 Environmental variance in lifetime mating success, mate choice and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 130, 91-112.
22. Janzen, F. J. & Brodie, E. D. III. 1989 Tall tails and sexy males: sexual behavior of rough-skinned newts (Taricha granulosa) in a natural breeding pond. Copeia 1989, 1068-1071.
23. Jones, A. G. 2001 Gerud1.0: a computer program for the reconstruction of parental genotypes from progeny arrays using multi-locus DNA data. Mol. Ecol. Notes 1, 215-218.
24. Jones, A. G., Rosenqvist, G., Berglund, A., Arnold, S. J. & Avise, J. C. 2000 The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 677-680. (DOI 10.1098/rspb.2000.1055.)
25. Jones, A. G., Blouin, M. S. & Arnold, S. J. 2001a Genetic variation in two populations of the rough-skinned newt (Taricha granulosa) assessed using novel tetranucleotide microsatellite loci. Mol. Ecol. Notes 1, 293-296.
26. Jones, A. G., Walker, D. & Avise, J. C. 2001b Genetic evidence for extreme polyandry and extraordinary sex-role reversal in a pipefish. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 2531-2535. (DOI 10.1098/rspb.2001.1841.)
27. Jones, A. G., Adams, E. M. & Arnold, S. J. 2002 Topping off: a mechanism of first-male sperm precedence in a vertebrate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 2078-2081.
28. Koenig, W. D. & Albano, S. S. 1986 On the measurement of sexual selection. Am. Nat. 127, 403-409.
29. Kokko, H., Mackenzie, A., Reynolds, J. D., Lindstrom, J. & Sutherland, W. J. 1999 Measures of inequality are not equal. Am. Nat. 72, 358-382.
30. Lande, R. 1982 A quantitative genetic theory of life history evolution. Ecology 63, 607-615.
31. Lande, R. & Arnold, S. J. 1983 The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37, 1210-1226.
32. Marshall, T. C., Slate, J., Kruuk, L. E. B. & Pemberton, J. M. 1998 Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7, 639-655.
33. δ-index, a measure of dispersion of individuals. Res. Pop. Ecol. 4, 1-7.
34. Oring, L. W. 1986 Avian polyandry. In Current ornithology, vol. 3 (ed. R. F. Johnston), pp. 309-351. New York: Plenum.
35. Partridge, L. & Endler, J. A. 1987 Life history constraints on sexual selection. In Sexual selection: testing the alternatives (ed. J. W. Bradbury & M. B. Andersson), pp. 265-277. Chichester: Wiley.
36. Pimentel, R. A. 1960 Inter- and intrahabitat movements of the rough-skinned newt, Taricha torosa granulosa (Skilton). Am. Midl. Nat. 63, 470-496.
37. Propper, C. R. 1991 Courtship in the rough-skinned newt Taricha granulosa. Anim. Behav. 41, 547-554.
38. Sutherland, W. J. 1985a Chance can produce a sex difference in variance in mating success and explain Bateman's data. Anim. Behav. 33, 1349-1352.
39. Sutherland, W. J. 1985b Measures of sexual selection. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 1, 90-101.
40. Sutherland, W. J. 1987 Random and deterministic components of variance in mating success. In Sexual selection: testing the alternatives (ed. J. W. Bradbury & M. B. Andersson), pp. 209-219. Chichester: Wiley.
41. Trivers, R. L. 1972 Parental investment and sexual selection. In Sexual selection and the descent of man (ed. B. Campbell), pp. 136-179. Chicago, IL: Aldine Press.
42. Twitty, V. C. 1966 Of scientists and salamanders. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
43. Wade, M. J. 1979 Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. Am. Nat. 114, 742-747.
44. Wade, M. J. 1987 Measuring sexual selection. In Sexual selection: testing the alternatives (ed. J. W. Bradbury & M. B. Andersson), pp. 197-207. Chichester: Wiley.
45. Wade, M. J. & Arnold, S. J. 1980 The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behavior, female choice and sperm precedence. Anim. Behav. 28, 446-461.
46. Wilkinson, G. S. (and 11 others) 1987 The empirical study of sexual selection. In Sexual selection: testing the alternatives (ed. J. W. Bradbury & M. B. Andersson), pp. 235-245. Chichester: Wiley.