Intra- and intersexual selection for multiple traits in the peacock (Pavo cristatus)

Ethology

Volumn 111, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 810-820

  Loyau, Adeline ^a,b   Jalme, Michel Saint ^b   Sorci, Gabriele ^a  

^a Laboratoire de Parasitologie Evolutive CNRS UMR 7103 UFR 927   (France)

^b MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GAMEBIRD; MATE CHOICE; MATING SUCCESS; SEXUAL SELECTION; SIGNALING;

ANIMALIA; PAVO CRISTATUS;

EID: 23744487356     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01091.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andersson, S. 1989: Sexual selection and cues for female choice in leks of Jackson's widowbird Euplectes jacksoni. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25, 403-410.
2. Andersson, S. Pryke, S. R., Örnborg, J. Lawes, M. J. & Andersson, M. 2002: Multiple receivers, multiple ornaments, and a trade-off between agonistic and epigamic signalling in a widowbird. Am. Nat. 160, 683-691.
3. Arnold, S. J. & Wade, M. J. 1984a: On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38, 709-719.
4. Arnold, S. J. & Wade, M. J. 1984b: On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications. Evolution 38, 720-734.
5. Balmford, A., Thomas, A. L. R. & Jones, I. L. 1993: Aerodynamics and the evolution of long tails in birds. Nature 361, 628-631.
6. Bradbury, J. W. 1981: The evolution of leks. In: Natural Selection and Social Behavior, Recent Research and New Theory (Alexander, R. D. & Tinkle, D. W., eds). Chiron Press, New York, pp. 138-169.
7. Bradbury, J. W. & Gibson, R. M. 1983: Leks and mate choice. In: Mate Choice (Bateson, P., ed). Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 109-138.
8. Davies, N. B. 1978: Ecological questions about territorial behaviour. In: Behavioural Ecology, an Evolutionary Approach (Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B., eds). Blackwell, London, pp. 317-351.
9. Evans, M. R. & Hatchwell, B. J. 1992a: An experimental study of male adornment in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird: I. The role of pectoral tufts in territorial defense. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29, 413-419.
10. Evans, M. R. & Hatchwell, B. J. 1992b: An experimental study of male adornment in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird: II. The role of the elongated tail in mate choice and experimental evidence for a handicap. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29, 421-427.
11. Evans, M. R. & Thomas, A. L. R. 1992: The aerodynamic and mechanical effects of elongated tails in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird: measuring the cost of a handicap. Anim. Behav. 43, 337-347.
12. Hamilton, W. D. & Zuk, M. 1982: Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites? Science 218, 384-387.
13. Höglund, J. & Alatalo, R. V. 1995: Leks. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
14. Höglund, J. & Lundberg, A. 1987: Sexual selection in a monomorphic lek-breeding bird: correlates of male mating success in the great snipe Gallinago media. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21, 211-216.
15. Holland, B. & Rice, W. R. 1998: Perspective: chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52, 1-7.
16. Johnstone, R. A. 1995: Honest advertisement of multiple qualities using multiple signals. J. Theor. Biol. 177, 87-94.
17. Møller, A. P. 1989: Viability costs of male tail ornaments in a swallow. Nature 339, 132-135.
18. Møller, A. P. & Petrie, M. 2002: Condition dependence, multiple sexual signals, and immunocompetence in peacocks. Behav. Ecol. 13, 248-253.
19. Møller, A. P. & Pomiankowski, A. 1993: Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32, 167-176.
20. Marchetti, K. 1998: The evolution of multiple male traits in the yellow-browed leaf warbler. Anim. Behav. 55, 361-376.
21. Mateos, C. 1998: Sexual selection in the ring-necked pheasant: a review. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 10, 313-332.
22. Payne, R. B. 1984: Sexual selection, lek and arena behavior, and sexual size dimorphism in birds. Ornithol. Monogr. 33, 1-52.
23. Petrie, M. 1994: Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains. Nature 371, 598-599.
24. Petrie, M. & Halliday, T. 1994: Experimental and natural changes in the peacock's (Pavo cristatus) train can affect mating success. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35, 213-217.
25. Petrie, M. Halliday, T. & Sanders, C. 1991: Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains. Anim. Behav. 41, 323-331.
26. Pryke, S. R., Andersson, S. & Lawes, M. J. 2001: Sexual selection of multiple handicaps in the red-collared widowbird: female choice of tail length but not carotenoid display. Evolution 55, 1452-1463.
27. Rands, M. R. W., Ridley, M. W. & Lelliott, A. D. 1984: The social organization of feral peafowl. Anim. Behav. 32, 830-835.
28. Rohwer, S. 1982: The evolution of reliable and unreliable badges of fighting ability. Am. Zool. 22, 531-546.
29. Rowe, C. 1999: Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals. Anim. Behav. 58, 921-931.
30. Ryan, M. J. 1990: Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 7, 157-195.
31. Savalli, U. M. 1994: Tail length affects territory ownership in the yellow-shouldered widowbird. Anim. Behav. 48, 105-111.
32. Sheldon, B. C. 2000: Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 397-402.
33. Swaddle, J. P. 1999: Limits to length asymmetry detection in starlings: implications for biological signalling. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 1299-1303.
34. Vehrencamp, S. L., Bradbury, J. W. & Gibson, R. M. 1989: The energetic cost of display in male sage grouse. Anim. Behav. 38, 885-898.
35. Yasmin, S. & Yahya, H. S. A. 1996: Correlates of mating success in Indian peafowl. Auk 113, 490-492.
36. Zuk, M., Ligon, J. D. Thornhill, R. 1992: Effects of experimental manipulation of male secondary sex characters on female mate preference in red jungle fowl. Anim. Behav. 44, 999-1006.