Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework

Internet and Higher Education

Volumn 13, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 31-36

  Garrison, D R ^a   Cleveland Innes, Martha ^b   Fung, Tak Shing ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b ATHABASCA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

CoI survey; Community of inquiry; Gender; Social presence; Structural equation modeling; Teaching presence

Indexed keywords

BLENDED LEARNING; CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS; COGNITIVE PRESENCE; COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY; FACTOR STRUCTURE; SOCIAL PRESENCE; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; STUDENT PERCEPTIONS; SURVEY INSTRUMENTS; TEACHING PRESENCE;

SURVEYS;

TEACHING;

EID: 76349110120     PISSN: 10967516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Akyol Z., and Garrison D.R. The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 12 3 (2008) 3-22
2. Allen I.E., and Seaman J. Staying the course: Online education in the United States (2008), Babson Survey Research Group, Boston, Sloan Consortium. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/staying_the_course.pdf Retrieved February 11, 2009 from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/staying_the_course.pdf
3. Anderson T., Rourke L., Garrison D.R., and Archer W. Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5 2 (2001). http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v5n2/v5n2_anderson.asp Retrieved December 10, 2004 from http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v5n2/v5n2_anderson.asp
4. Arbaugh J.B. Is there an optimal design for on-line MBA courses?. The Internet and Higher Education 4 2 (2005) 135-149
5. Arbaugh J.B. Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses?. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 9 2 (2008). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/490/1045 Retrieved September 9, 2008 from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/490/1045
6. Arbaugh J.B., Cleveland-Innes M., Diaz S., Garrison D.R., Ice P., Richardson J., et al. Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. Internet and Higher Education 11 (2008) 133-136
7. Becher T., and Trowler P. Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. 2nd ed. (2001), Open University Press, Philadelphia, PA
8. Dede C. Cyberinfrastructure and the evolution of higher education (2008), EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research, Boulder, Colorado. http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ecar_so/erb/ERB0818.pdf Retrieved November 19 from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ecar_so/erb/ERB0818.pdf
9. Garrison D.R. Communities of inquiry in online learning. In: Rogers P.L., et al. (Ed). Encyclopedia of distance learning. 2nd ed. (2009), IGI Global, Hershey, PA 352-355
10. Garrison D.R., and Anderson T. E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2003), Routledge/Falmer, London
11. Garrison D.R., Anderson T., and Archer W. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 2 2-3 (2000) 87-105
12. Garrison D.R., Anderson T., and Archer W. Critical thinking, cognitive presence and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education 15 1 (2001) 7-23
13. Garrison D.R., and Arbaugh J.B. Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. Internet and Higher Education 10 3 (2007) 157-172
14. Garrison D.R., and Archer W. A transactional perspective on teaching-learning: A framework for adult and higher education (2000), Pergamon, Oxford, UK
15. Garrison D.R., and Cleveland-Innes M. Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education 19 3 (2005) 133-148
16. Garrison D.R., Cleveland-Innes M., Koole M., and Kappelman J. Revisiting methodological issues in the analysis of transcripts: Negotiated coding and reliability. The Internet and Higher Education 9 1 (2006) 1-8
17. Hannafin M.J., and Kim M.C. In search of a future: A critical analysis of research on web-based teaching and learning. Instructional Science 31 (2003) 347-351
18. Kramarae C. Gender matters in online learning. In: Moore M.G. (Ed). Handbook of distance education. 2nd ed. (2007), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, London 169-180
19. Meyer K.A. Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7 3 (2003) 55-65
20. Müller T. Persistence of women in online degree-completion programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 9 2 (2008). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/455/1069 Retrieved October 31, 2008 from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/455/1069
21. Pawan F., Paulus T.M., Yalcin S., and Chang C. Online learning: Patterns of engagement and interaction among in-service teachers. Language Learning & Technology 7 3 (2003) 119-140
22. Rovai A., and Baker J. Gender differences in online learning: Sense of community, perceived learning and interpersonal interactions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 6 1 (2005) 31-44
23. Schrire S. Interaction and cognition in asynchronous computer conferencing. Instructional Science 32 (2004) 475-502
24. Shea P., and Bidjerano T. Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster "epistemic engagement" and "cognitive presence" in online education. Computers and Education 52 3 (2009) 543-553
25. Shea P., Li C.S., and Pickett A. A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. Internet and Higher Education 9 3 (2006) 175-190
26. Shea P., Li C., Swan K., and Pickett A. Developing learning community in online asynchronous college courses: The role of teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 9 4 (2005). http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v9n4/v9n4_shea.asp Retrieved May 1, 2008 from: http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v9n4/v9n4_shea.asp
27. Swan K., Garrison D.R., and Richardson J. A constructivist approach to online learning: The community of inquiry framework. In: Payne C.R. (Ed). Information technology and constructivism in higher education: Progressive learning frameworks (2009), IGI Global, Hershey, PA 43-57
28. Swan K., Shea P., Richardson J., Ice P., Garrison D.R., Cleveland-Innes M., et al. Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. E-Mentor 2 24 (2008) 1-12. http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/e_index.php?numer=24&all=1 Retrieved September 9, 2008 from http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/e_index.php?numer=24&all=1
29. Swan K., and Shih L.F. On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 9 (2005) 115-136
30. Wu D., and Hiltz S.R. Predicting learning from asynchronous online discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8 2 (2004) 139-152