Timing of present and future snowmelt from high elevations in northwest Montana

Water Resources Research

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Gillan, Bonnie J ^a   Harper, Joel T ^a   Moore, Johnnie N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE VARIABILITY AND CHANGE; COMPLEX TOPOGRAPHIES; GROUND MEASUREMENTS; HIGH ELEVATION; METEOROLOGICAL DATA; MONTANA; POINT MEASUREMENT; SNOW ACCUMULATION; SNOW WATER EQUIVALENT; SNOWMELT; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; TEMPERATURE VARIABILITY;

CLIMATE CHANGE; LANDFORMS; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SNOW; TIME MEASUREMENT; WATER SUPPLY;

SNOW MELTING SYSTEMS;

CLIMATE VARIATION; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SNOW WATER EQUIVALENT; SNOWMELT; TEMPERATURE GRADIENT; TERRAIN; WATER SUPPLY;

MONTANA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 76149124855     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2009WR007861     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Anderson, R. M., V. I. Koren, and S. M. Reed (2006), Using SSURGO data to improve Sacramento Model a priori parameter estimates, J. Hydrol., 320, 103-116, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.020. (Pubitemid 43294703)
2. Bandaragoda, C., D. G. Tarboton, and R. Woods (2004), Application of TOPNET in the distributed model comparison project, J. Hydrol., 298, 178-201, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.038. (Pubitemid 39098773)
3. Behnaz, K., B. Imam, K. Hsu, and S. Sorooshian (2009), From lumped to distributed via semi-distributed: Calibration strategies for semi-distributed hydrologic models, J. Hydrol., in press.
4. Beven, K. J. (1989), Changing ideas in hydrology-The case of physically based models, J. Hydrol., 105, 157-172, doi:10.1016/0022-1694(89) 90101-7.
5. Beven, K. J. (1996), A discussion of distributed hydrological modeling, in Distributed Hydrological Modelling, edited by M. B. Abbott and J. C. Refsgaard, pp. 255- 278, Kluwer Acad., Dordrecht, Netherlands.
6. Boyle, D. P., H. V. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian (2000), Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods, Water Resour. Res., 36(12), 3663-3674, doi:10.1029/ 2000WR900207. (Pubitemid 32039916)
7. Brath, A., A. Montanari, and E. Toth (2004), Analysis of the effects of different scenarios of historical data availability on the calibration of a spatially distributed hydrological model, J. Hydrol., 291, 232-253, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.044. (Pubitemid 38527207)
8. Burnash, R., R. Ferral, and R. McGuire (1973), A generalized streamflow simulation system conceptual modeling for digital computers, State of California, report, Dep. of Water Resour., U.S. Dep. of Commer., Natl. Weather Serv., Sacramento, Calif.
9. Carrera, J., and S. P. Neuman (1986), Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady state conditions: 1. Maximum likelihood method incorporating prior information, Water Resour. Res., 22(2), 199-210, doi:10.1029/WR022i002p00199.
10. Cornfield, H. E., and V. L. Lopes (2004), Parameter identification in a twomultiplier sediment yield model, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 40(2), 321-332, doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb01032.x.
11. Demarty, J., C. Ottl, I. Braud, A. Olioso, J. P. Frangi, H. V. Gupta, and L. A. Bastidas (2005), Constraining a physically based SVAT model with surface water content and thermal infrared brightness temperature measurements using a multiobjective approach, Water Resour. Res., 41, W01011, doi:10.1029/ 2004WR003695. (Pubitemid 40359291)
12. Doherty, J., and B. E. Skahill (2006), An advanced regularization methodology for use in watershed model calibration, J. Hydrol., 327, 564-577, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.11.058. (Pubitemid 44093548)
13. Dunn, S. M. (1999), Imposing constraints on parameter values of a conceptual hydrological models using baseflow response, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 3(2), 271-284.
14. Eckhardt, K., and J. G. Arnold (2001), Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model, J. Hydrol., 251, 103-109, doi:10.1016/S0022- 1694(01)00429-2. (Pubitemid 32731525)
15. Francés, F., J. I. Vélez, and J. J. Vélez (2007), Split-parameter structure for the automatic calibration of distributed hydrological models, J. Hydrol., 332, 226-240, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06. 032. (Pubitemid 44937323)
16. Gupta, H. V., S. Sorooshian, and P. O. Yapo (1998), Towards improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and non-commensurable measures of information, Water Resour. Res., 34(4), 751-763, doi:10.1029/ 97WR03495.
17. Gupta, H. V., S. Sorooshian, T. S. Hogue, and D. P. Boyle (2003), Advances in automatic calibration of watershed models, in Calibration of Watershed Models, Water Sci. Appl., vol.6, edited by Q. Duan et al., pp. 9 - 28, AGU, Washington, D. C.
18. Gupta, H. V., K. J. Beven, and T. Wagener (2006), Model calibration and uncertainty estimation, in Encyclopedia of Hydrologic Sciences, pp. 2015- 2031, John Wiley, New York.
19. Gupta, H. V., T. Wagener, and Y. Liu (2008), Reconciling theory with observations: Elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation, Hydrol. Processes, 22(18), 3802-3813, doi:10.1002/hyp.6989.
20. Gupta, H. V., H. Kling, K. K. Yilmaz, and G. F. Martinez-Baquero (2009), Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80-91, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003.
21. Herbst, M., H. V. Gupta, and M. C. Casper (2009), Mapping model behaviour using self-organizing maps, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 395-409.
22. Isaaks, E. H., and R. M. Srivastava (1989), Applied Geostatistics, Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
23. Khu, S. T., H. Madsen, and F. di Pierro (2008), Incorporating multiple observations for distributed hydrologic model calibration: An approach using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm and clustering, Adv. Water Resour., 31, 1387-1398, doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.07.011.
24. Koren, V. I., M. Smith, D. Wang, and Z. Zhang (2000), Use of soil property data in the derivation of conceptual rainfall runoff model parameters, paper presented at 15th Conference on Hydrology, Am. Meteorol. Soc., Long Beach, Calif.
25. Koren,V., M. Smith, and Q. Duan (2003), Use of a priori parameter estimates in the derivation of spatially consistent parameter sets of rainfall-runoff models, in Calibration of Watershed Models, Water Sci. Appl., vol.6, edited by Q. Duan et al., pp. 239- 254, AGU, Washington, D. C.
26. Lawson, C. L., and J. R. Hanson (1995), Solving Least Squares Problems, Classics Appl. Math., vol.15, 337 pp., Soc. for Ind. and Appl. Math., Philadelphia, Pa.
27. Leavesly, G. H., L. E. Hay, R. J. Viger, and S. L. Markstrom (2003), Use of a priori parameter-estimation methods to constrain calibration of distributed-parameter models, in Calibration of Watershed Models, Water Sci. Appl., vol.6, edited by Q. Duan et al., pp. 9 -28, AGU, Washington, D. C.
28. Leplastrier, M., A. J. Pitman, H. V. Gupta, and Y. Xia (2002), Exploring the relationship between complexity and performance in a land surface model using the multi-criteria method, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D20), 4443, doi:10.1029/2001JD000931.
29. Linden, J., B. Vinsonneau, and K. J. Burnham (2005), Review and enhancement of cautious parameter estimation for model based control: A specific realisation of regularization, paper presented at International Conference on Systems Engineering, Inst. of Electr. and Electron. Eng., Las Vegas, Nev., 16-18 Aug.
30. Madsen, H. (2003), Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives, Adv. Water Resour., 26, 205-216, doi:10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00092-1. (Pubitemid 36093693)
31. McCuen, R. H., and W. M. Snyder (1975), A proposed index for comparing hydrographs, Water Resour. Res., 11(6), 1021-1024, doi:10.1029/ WR011i006p01021.
32. Nash, J. E., and J. V. Sutcliffe (1970), River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I: A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282-290, doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6.
33. NOAA (2007), DHM grid scalar editor program-User manual, Off. of Hydrol. Dev., Natl. Weather Serv., Silver Spring, Md. (Available at http://www.nws.noaa. gov/oh/hrl/hseb/docs/DHM-Grid-Scalar-Editor- User-Manual.pdf
34. Pokhrel, P. (2007), Estimation of spatially distributed model parameters using a regularization approach, M.S. thesis, Dep. of Hydrol. and Water Resour., Univ. of Ariz., Tucson.
35. Pokhrel, P., H. V. Gupta, and T. Wagener (2008), A spatial regularization approach to parameter estimation for a distributed watershed model, Water Resour. Res., 44, W12419, doi:10.1029/2007WR006615.
36. Pokhrel, P., K. K. Yilmaz, and H. V. Gupta (2009), Multiple-criteria calibration of a distributed watershed model using spatial regularization and response signatures, J. Hydrol., doi:10.1016/2008.12.004, in press.
37. S., V. Koren, M. Smith, Z. Zhang, F. Moreda, D.-J. Seo, (2004), Overall distributed model intercomparison project results, J. Hydrol., 298(1-4), 27- 60, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.031. (Pubitemid 39098767)
38. Refsgaard, J. C. (1997), Parameterization, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models, J. Hydrol., 198(1 - 4), 69-97, doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03329-X. (Pubitemid 27340887)
39. Refsgaard, J. C., and B. Storm (1996), Construction, calibration and validation of hydrological models, in Distributed Hydrological Modeling, edited by M. B. Abbott and J. C. Refsgaard, pp. 41-54, Kluwer Acad., Dordrecht, Netherlands.
40. Schaefli, B., and H. V. Gupta (2007), Do Nash values have value?, Hydrol. Processes, 21(15), 2075-2080, doi:10.1002/hyp.6825. (Pubitemid 47098253)
41. Seibert, J., and J. J. McDonnell (2002), On the dialog between experimentalist and modeler in catchment hydrology: Use of soft data for multicriteria model calibration, Water Resour. Res., 38(11), 1241, doi:10.1029/ 2001WR000978.
42. Smith, M. B., D.-J. Seo, V. I. Koren, S. Reed, Z. Zhang, Q.-Y. Duan, S. Cong, F. Moreda, and R. Anderson (2004), The Distributed Model Intercomparison Project (DMIP): Motivation and experiment design, J. Hydrol., 298(1-4), 4-26, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.040. (Pubitemid 39098766)
43. Smith, M., V. Koren, S. Reed, Z. Zhang, D. J. Seo, F. Moreda, and Z. Cui (2006), The Distributed Model Intercomparison Project: Phase 2 science plan, Hydrol. Lab., Off. of Hydrol. Dev., Natl. Weather Serv., NOAA, Silver Spring, Md. (Available at http://www.weather.gov/oh/hrl/dmip/2/ docs/dmip-2-plan- march10-06.pdf)
44. Tikhonov, A., and V. Arsenin (1977), Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems, Halsted, New York.
45. Tonkin, M., and J. Doherty (2005), A hybrid regularized inversion methodology for highly parameterized environmental models, Water Resour. Res., 41, W10412, doi:10.1029/2005WR003995. (Pubitemid 41705697)
46. van Werkhoven, K., T. Wagener, P. Reed, and Y. Tang (2008a), Characterization of watershed model behavior across a hydroclimatic gradient, Water Resour. Res., 44, W01429, doi:10.1029/2007WR006271. (Pubitemid 351304154)
47. Van Werkhoven, K., T. Wagener, P. Reed, and Y. Tang (2008b), Rainfall characteristics define the value of streamflow observations for distributed watershed model identification, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L11403, doi:10.1029/2008GL034162.
48. Vieux, B. E. (2001), Distributed Hydrologic Modeling Using GIS, Water Sci. Technol. Ser., vol.38, 1st ed., Kluwer Acad., Norwell, Mass.
49. Vieux, B. E., and F. G. Moreda (2003), Ordered physics-based parameter adjustment of a distributed model, in Calibration of Watershed Models, Water Sci. Appl., vol.6, edited by Q. Duan et al., pp. 9 - 28, AGU, Washington, D. C.
50. Vieux, B. E., Z. Cui, and A. Gaur (2004), Evaluation of a physics-based distributed hydrologic model for flood forecasting, J. Hydrol., 298(1-4), 155-177, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.035. (Pubitemid 39098772)
51. Vrugt, J. A., H. V. Gupta, L. A. Bastidas, W. Bouten, and S. Sorooshian (2003), Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models, Water Resour. Res., 39(8), 1214, doi:10.1029/ 2002WR001746.
52. Wagener, T., and H. V. Gupta (2005), Model identification for hydrological forecasting under uncertainty, J. Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 19, 378-387, doi:10.1007/s00477-005-0006-5. (Pubitemid 41801064)
53. Wagener, T., K. Van Werkhoven, P. Reed, and Y. Tang (2009), Multiobjective sensitivity analysis to understand the information content in streamflow observations for distributed watershed modeling, Water Resour. Res., 45, W02501, doi:10.1029/2008WR007347.
54. Weiss, R., and L. Smith (1998), Parameter space methods in joint parameter estimation for groundwater flow models, Water Resour. Res., 34(4), 647-661, doi:10.1029/97WR03467.
55. Xia, Y., A. J. Pitman, H. V. Gupta, M. Leplastrier, A. Henderson-Sellers, and L. A. Bastidas (2002), Calibrating a land surface model of varying complexity using multicriteria methods and the Cabauw dataset, J. Hydrometeorol., 3, 181-194, doi:10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003 2.0.CO;2.
56. Yatheendradas, S., T. Wagener, V. Gupta, K. Unkrich, D. Goodrich, M. Schaeffer, and A. Stewart (2008), Understanding uncertainty in distributed flash-flood forecasting for semi-arid regions, Water Resour. Res., 44, W05S19, doi:10.1029/2007WR005940. (Pubitemid 351897353)
57. Yilmaz, K. K., H. V. Gupta, and T. Wagener (2008), A process-based diagnostic approach to model evaluation: Application to the NWS distributed hydrologic model, Water Resour. Res., 44, W09417, doi:10.1029/2007WR006716.