Mapping model behaviour using Self-Organizing Maps

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 395-409

  Herbst, M ^a   Gupta, H V ^b   Casper, M C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; MODEL VALIDATION; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; TIME SERIES; TRADE-OFF; WATERSHED;

EID: 68149135416     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: 16077938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-13-395-2009     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abramowitz, G., Gupta, H. V., Pitman, A., Wang, Y., Leuning, R., Cleugh, H., and Hsu, K.-l.: Neural Error Regression Diagnosis (NERD): A Tool for Model Bias Identification and Prognostic Data Assimilation, J. Hydrometeorol., 7, 160-177, doi:10.1175/JHM479.1, 2006.
2. Abramowitz, G., Pitman, A., Gupta, H. V., Kowalczyk, E., and Wang, Y.: Systematic Bias in Land Surface Models, J. Hydro meteorol., 8, 989-1001, doi:10.1175/JHM628.1, 2007. (Pubitemid 350148659)
3. Abramowitz, G. and Gupta, H. V.: Toward a model space and model independence metric, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L05705, doi:10.1029/2007GL032834, 2008. (Pubitemid 351676025)
4. Abramowitz, G., Leuning, R., Clark, M., and Pitman, A.: Evaluating the Performance of Land Surface Models, J. Climate, 21, 5468-5481, doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2378.1, 2008.
5. Alhoniemi, E., Hollmén, J., Simula, O., and Vesanto, J.: Process Monitoring and Modeling using the Self-Organizing Map, Integr. Comput. Aid. E., 6, 3-14, 1999.
6. Ambroise, B., Perrin, J. L., and Reutenauer, D.: Multicriterion validation of a semi distributed conceptual model of the water cycle in the Fecht Catchment (Vosges Massif, France), Water Resour. Res., 31, 1467-1482, 1995. (Pubitemid 26440460)
7. Boogaard, H. F. P. v. d., Mynett, A. E., and Ali, M. S.: Selforganiz- ing feature maps for the analysis of hydrological and ecological data sets, in: Hydro informatics '98, edited by: Babovic, V. M. and Larsen, L. C., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 733-740, 1998.
8. Boyle, D. P., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods, Water Resour. Res., 36, 3663-3674, 2000. (Pubitemid 32039916)
9. Chang, D.-H.: Analysis and modeling of space-time organization of remotely sensed soil moisture, Department ofCivil and Environmental Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, 169 pp., Ph. D. thesis, 2001.
10. Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K.: Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models, Water Resour. Res., 28, 1015-1031, doi:10.1029/91WR02985, 1992.
11. Franks, S. W., Gineste, P., Beven, K. J., and Merot, P.: On constraining the predictions of a distributed model: the incorporation of fuzzy estimates of saturated areas into the calibration process, Water Resour. Res., 34, 787-797, doi:10.1029/97WR03041, 1998. (Pubitemid 28159457)
12. Gallart, F., Latron, J., Llorens, P., and Beven, K.: Using internal catchment information to reduce the uncertainty of discharge and base flow predictions, Adv. Water Resour., 30, 808-823, doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2006.06. 005, 2007. (Pubitemid 46268506)
13. Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P. O.: Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and non commensurable measures of information, Water Resour. Res., 34, 751-764, 1998.
14. Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Hogue, T. S., and Boyle, D. P.: Advances in Automatic Calibration of Watershed Models, in Calibration of Watershed Models, edited by Duan, Q., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Rousseau, A. N., and Turcotte, R., Water Science and Application Series Vol. 6, AGU, Washington DC, USA, 9-28, 2003.
15. Gupta, H. V., Wagener, T., and Liu, Y.: Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation, Hydrol. Process., 22, 3802-3813, doi:10.1002/hyp.6989, 2008.
16. Hall, M. J.: How well does your model fit the data? J. Hydro inform., 3, 49-55, 2001.
17. Haykin, S.: Neural networks - a comprehensive foundation, 2nd ed., New Jersey, USA, 842 pp., 1999.
18. Herbst, M. and Casper, M. C.: Towards model evaluation and identification using Self-Organizing Maps, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 657-667, 2008, http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/12/657/2008/.
19. Hsu, K.-L., Gupta, H. V., Gao, X., Sorooshian, S., and Imam, B.: Self-organizing linear output map (SOLO): An artificial neural network suitable for hydrologic modeling and analysis, Water Resour. Res., 38, 1302, doi:10.1029/2001WR000795, 2002.
20. Huang, M., Liang, X., and Liang, Y.: A transferability study of model parameters for the variable infiltration capacity land surface scheme, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D22), 8864, doi:10.1029/2003JD003676, 2003.
21. Hydrotec: Rainfall-Runoff-Model NASIM - program documentation (in German), Hydrotec GmbH, Aachen, Germany, 579 pp., 2005.
22. Kalteh, A. M. and Berndtsson, R.: Interpolating monthly precipitation by self-organizing map (SOM) and multilayer perceptron (MLP), Hydrol. Sci. J., 52, 305-317, 2007.
23. Kaski, S.: Data Exploration Using Self Organizing Maps, Dr. thesis, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland, 57 pp., 1997.
24. Kohonen, T.: Self-Organizing Maps, 3rd ed., Information Sciences, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 501 pp., 2001.
25. Lamb, R., Beven, K., and Myrabe, S.: Use of spatially distributed water table observations to constrain uncertainty in a rainfall- runoff model, Adv. Water Resour., 22, 305-317, 1998.
26. Lane, S. N.: Assessment of rainfall-runoff models based upon wavelet analysis, Hydrol. Process., 21, 586-607,2007.
27. Legates, D. R. and McCabe Jr., G. J.: Evaluating the use of "goodness of fit" measures in hydrologic and hydro climatic model validation, Water Resour. Res., 35, 233-241, doi:10.10291998WR900018, 1999.
28. Lin, G.-F. and Chen, L.-H.: Identification of homogeneous regions for regional frequency analysis using the self-organizing map, J. Hydrol., 324, 1-9, 2006.
29. Lin, Z. and Beck, M. B.: On the identification of model structure in hydrological and environmental systems, Water Resour. Res., 43, W02402, doi:10.1029/2005WR004796, 2007. (Pubitemid 46502872)
30. Lischeid, G.: A decision support system for mountain basin management using sparse data, EGU General Assembly 2006, Vienna, Geophys. Res. Abstr., 8, EGU06-A-04223, 2006.
31. Lourenço, F. C.: Exploratory Geospatial Data Analysis Using Self-Organizing Maps - Case Study of Portuguese Mainland Regions, M.Sc. thesis, Instituto Superior de Estatística e Gestão de Informaç ão, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lissabon, Portugal, 143 pp., 2005.
32. Madsen, H.: Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives, Adv. Water Resour., 26, 205-216, 2003.
33. Mele, P. M. and Crowley, D. E.: Application of self-organizing maps for assessing soil biological quality, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 126, 139-152, 2008.
34. Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models - Part I - A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282-290, 1970.
35. Peeters, L., Bação, F., Lobo, V., and Dassargues, A.: Exploratory data analysis and clustering of multivariate spatial hydro geological data by means of GEO3DSOM, a variant of Kohonen's Self- Organizing Map, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 1309-1321, 2007, http://www.hydrol-earth- syst-sci.net/11/1309/2007/.
36. Rajanayaka, C., Kulasiri, D., and Samarasinghe, S.: A Comparative Study ofParameter Estimation in Hydrology Modelling: Artificial Neural Networks and Curve Fitting Approaches, International Conference on Modelling and Simulation, MODSIM 2003 Congress, Townsville, Australia, 2003.
37. Reusser, D. E., Blume, T., Schaefli, B., and Zehe, E.: Analysing the temporal dynamics of model performance for hydrological models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 5, 3169-3211, 2008, http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci- discuss.net/5/3169/2008/.
38. Schaefli, B. and Gupta, H. V.: Do Nash values have value? Hydrol. Proc., 21, 2075-2080, 2007.
39. Schütze, N., Schmitz, G. H., and Petersohn, U.: Self-organizing maps with multiple input-output option for modeling the Richards equation and its inverse solution, Water Resour. Res., 41, W03022, doi:10.1029/2004WR003630, 2005. (Pubitemid 40589264)
40. Seibert, J.: Multi-criteria calibration of a conceptual runoff model using a genetic algorithm, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 4, 215-224, 2000.
41. Simon, G., Lendasse, A., Cottrell, M., Fort, J. C., and Verleysen, M.: Time series forecasting: Obtaining long term trends with self-organizing maps, Pattern Recogn. Lett., 26, 12, 1795 - 1808, doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2005.03.002, 2005. (Pubitemid 41049654)
42. Simula, O., Vesanto, J., Alhoniemi, E., and Hollmén, J.: Analysis and Modeling of Complex Systems Using the Self-Organizing Map, in: Neuro-Fuzzy Techniques for Intelligent Information Systems, edited by: Kasabov, N. and Kozma, R., Physica Ver lag (Springer), 3-22, 1999.
43. Vesanto, J.: Using the SOM and Local Models in Time-Series Prediction, Workshop on Self-Organizing Maps, WSOM'97, Espoo, Finland, 1997.
44. Vesanto, J.: Using SOM in Data Mining, Licentiate's thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, 57 pp., 2000a.
45. Vesanto, J.: Neural network tool for data mining: SOM toolbox, Symposium on Tool Environments and Development Methods for Intelligent Systems (TOOLMET2000), Oulu, Finnland, 184-196, 2000b.
46. Vesanto, J., Himberg, J., Alhoniemi, E., and Parhankangas, J.: SOM Toolbox for Matlab 5, Helsinki University ofTechnology, Report A57, Espoo, Finland, 60 pp., 2000.
47. Vrugt, J. A., Weerts, A. H., and Bouten, W.: Information content of data for identifying soil hydraulic parameters from outflow experiments, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 65, 19-27, 2001.
48. Vrugt, J. A., Bouten, W., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Toward improved identifi ability of hydrologic model parameters: The information content of experimental data, Water Resour. Res., 38, doi:10.1029/2001WR001118, 2002.
49. Wagener, T., Mclntyre, N., Lees, M. J., Wheater, H. S., and Gupta, H. V.: Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling: dynamic identifi ability analysis, Hydrol. Process., 17, 455-476, 2003a.
50. Wagener, T., Wheater, H. S., and Gupta, H. V.: Identification and Evaluation of Watershed Models, in Calibration of Watershed Models, edited by Duan, Q., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Rousseau, A. N., and Turcotte, R., Water Science and Application Series Vol. 6, AGU, Washington DC, 29-47, 2003b.
51. Warren Liao, T.: Clustering of time series data - a survey, Pattern Recogn.,38, 1857-1874, doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2005.01.025, 2005. (Pubitemid 41214630)
52. Willmott, C. J.: On the validation ofmodels, Phys. Geogr., 2, 184-194, 1981.
53. Yilmaz, K. K., Gupta, H. V., and Wagener, T.: A process-based diagnostic approach to model evaluation: Application to the NWS distributed hydrologic model, Water Resour. Res., 44, W09417, doi:10.1029/2007WR006716, 2008.
54. Zadeh, L.: Optimality and non-scalar-valued performance criteria, IEEE T. Automat. Contr., 8, 59-60, 1963.