Imposing constraints on parameter values of a conceptual hydrological model using baseflow response

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 271-284

  Dunn, Sarah M ^a  

^a SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASEFLOW; HYDROLOGICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; STREAMFLOW;

CARRON VALLEY; SCOTLAND; UNITED KINGDOM; YTHAN RIVER;

EID: 0032858388     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-3-271-1999     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Abbott, M.B., Bathurst, J.C., Cunge, J.A., O'Connell, P.E. and Rasmussen, J., 1986. An introduction to the European Hydrological System - Système Hydrologique Européen, 'SHE' I: History and philosophy of a physically based distributed modelling system, J. Hydrol. 87, 45-59.
2. Beven K.J. and Binley A.M., 1992. The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Process. 6, 279-298.
3. Boorman, D.B., Hollis, J.M. and Lilly, A., 1995. Hydrology of soil types; a hydrologically based classification of the soils of the United Kingdom. Institute of Hydrology Report No.126.
4. Corwin, D.L., Vaughan, P.J. and League, K., 1997. Modelling nonpoint source pollutants in the vadose zone with GIS, Env. Sci. Tech., 31, 8, 2157-2175.
5. Dunn, S.M. and Mackay, R., 1996. Modelling the hydrological impacts of open ditch drainage, J. Hydrol., 179, 37-66.
6. Dunn, S.M., 1998. Large scale modelling using small scale processes, In Hydrology in a Changing Environment, Vol.1, ed. H. Wheater and C. Kirby, pp 11-20, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
7. Dunn, S.M., McAlister, E. and Ferner, R.C., 1998. Development and application of a distributed catchment-scale hydrological model for the River Ythan, NE Scotland, Hydrol. Process., 12, 401-416.
8. Dunn, S.M. and Ferrier, R.C., 1999. Natural flow in managed catchments: A case study of a modelling approach, Wat. Res., 33, 3, 621-630.
9. Franks, S.W., Gineste, P., Beven, K.J. and Merot, P., 1998. On constraining the predictions of a distributed model: the incorporation of fuzzy estimates of saturated areas into the calibration process, Wat. Resour. Res., 34, 787-797.
10. Freer J., Beven, K.J. and Ambroise, B., 1996. Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: An application of the GLUE approach, Wat. Resour. Res., 32, 7, 2161-2173.
11. Gupta, H.V., Sorooshian, S. and Yapo, P.O., 1998. Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and non-commensurable measures of information, Wat. Resour. Res., 34, 4, 751-763.
12. Jakeman, A.J. and Hornberger, G.M., 1993. How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model, Wat. Resour. Res., 29, 2637-2649.
13. Kuczera, G. and Mroczkowski, M., 1998. Assessment of hydrologic parameter uncertainty and the worth of multiresponse data, Wat. Resour. Res., 34, 6, 1481-1489.
14. Nash, K.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models 1. A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282-290.
15. Spear, R.C. and Hornberger, G.M., 1980. Eutrophication in Peel Inlet, II, Identification of critical uncertainties via Generalised Sensitivity Analysis, Water Res., 14, 43-49.
16. Yapo, P.O., Gupta, H.V., and Sorooshian, S., 1998. Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models, J. Hydrol., 204, 83-97.