Generalizations to control laws of image-based visual servoing

International Journal of Optomechatronics

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 167-186

  Nematollahi, Eissa ^a   Janabi Sharifi, Farrokh ^b  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Interaction matrix; Robotics; Stability; Vision based control

Indexed keywords

CAMERA RETREAT PROBLEM; CONTROL LAWS; CONTROL METHODS; IMAGE-BASED; INTERACTION MATRICES; INTERACTION MATRIX; LOCAL STABILITY; MATRIX APPROXIMATION; SIMULATION RESULT; VISION BASED CONTROL;

CAMERAS; ROBOTICS; STABILITY; VISUAL SERVOING;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 75249095750     PISSN: 15599612     EISSN: 15599620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15599610903144161     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bernstein, D. 2005. Matrix Mathematics: Theory, Facts, and Formulas with Application to Linear Systems Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2. Chaumette, F. 1998. Potential problems of stability and convergence in image-based and position-based visual servoing. In The Confluence of Vision and Control, eds. D. Kriegman, G. Hager, and A. Morse, Vol. 237 of Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Berlin: Springer, pp. 66-78.
3. Chaumette, F. and S. Hutchinson, S. 2006. Visual servo control. I. Basic approaches. Robotics & Automation Magazine, IEEE 13(4):82-90.
4. Deng, L. 2004. Comparison of image-based and position-based robot visual servoing methods and improvements. PhD thesis, Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo.
5. Espiau, B., F. Chaumette, and P. Rives. 1992. A new approach to visual servoing in robotics. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 8(3):313-326.
6. Hashimoto, K., ed. 1993. Visual Servoing: Real Time Control of Robot Manipulators Based on Visual Sensory Feedback. Vol. 7 of World Scientific Series in Robotics and Automated Systems. London: World Scientific.
7. Hutchinson, S., G. Hager, and P. Corke. 1996. A tutorial on visual servo control. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 12(5):651-670.
8. Janabi-Sharifi, F. 2002. Visual servoing: Theory and applications. In Opto-Mechatronic Systems Handbook, ed. H. Cho, Chap. 15, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 1-24.
9. Lingfeng, D., F. Janabi-Sharifi, and W. Wilson. 2002. Stability and robustness of visual servoing methods. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Proceedings. ICRA'02 2:1604-1609.
10. Liu, Y., H. Wang, C. Wang, and K. Lam. 2006. Uncalibrated visual servoing of robots using a depth-independent interaction matrix. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 22(4):804-817.
11. Malis, E. 2004a. Improving vision-based control using efficient second-order minimization techniques. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Proceedings. ICRA'04 2:1843-1848.
12. Malis, E. 2004b. Visual servoing invariant to changes in camera-intrinsic parameters. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 20(1):72-81.
13. Malis, E., F. Chaumette, and S. Boudet. 1999. 2-1/2-D visual servoing. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 15(2):238-250.
14. Malis, E. and P. Rives. 2003. Robustness of image-based visual servoing with respect to depth distribution errors. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Proceedings. ICRA'03 1:1056-1061.
15. Marey, M. and F. Chaumette. 2008. Analysis of classical and new visual servoing control laws. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Proceedings. ICRA'08 3244-3249.
16. Papanikolopoulos, N. 1992. Controlled active vision. PhD thesis, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
17. Papanikolopoulos, N. 1995. Selection of features and evaluation of visual measurements during robotic visual servoing tasks. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 13(3):279-304.
18. Wang, H., Y. Liu, and D. Zhou. 2008. Adaptive visual servoing using point and line features with an uncalibrated eye-in-hand camera. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 24(4):843-857.
19. Wilson, W., C. Hulls, and G. Bell. 1996. Relative end-effector control using cartesian position based visual servoing. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 12(5):684-696.