Improving Memory after Interruption: Exploiting Soft Constraints and Manipulating Information Access Cost

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 291-306

  Morgan, Phillip L ^a   Patrick, John ^a   Waldron, Samuel M ^a   King, Sophia L ^a   Patrick, Tanya ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

information access cost; interruption; memory; soft constraints hypothesis

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECALL; TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SERIAL LEARNING; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 75149150281     PISSN: 1076898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0018008     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Altmann, E. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2002). Integrating decay and interference: A new look at an old interaction. Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 65-70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Altmann E.M., and Trafton G.J. Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cognitive Science 26 (2002) 39-83
3. Altmann, E. M., & Trafton, G. J. (2004). Task Interruption: Resumption lag and the role of cues. Proceedings of the 26th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 42-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Anderson J.R. Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem solutions. Psychological Review 94 (1987) 192-210
5. Anderson J.R., Bothell D., Byrne M.D., Douglass S., Lebiere C., and Qin Y. An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review 111 (2004) 1036-1360
6. Anderson J.R., and Douglass S. Tower of Hanoi: Evidence for the cost of goal retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27 (2001) 1331-1346
7. Anderson J.R., and Lebiere C. The atomic components of thought (1998), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
8. Bainbridge L. Analysis of verbal protocols from a process control task. In: Edwards E., and Lees F.P. (Eds). The human operator in process control (1984), Taylor and Francis, London 146-158
9. Bainbridge L. Ironies of automation. In: Rasmussen J., Duncan K., and Leplat J. (Eds). New technology and human error (1987), Wiley, New York 271-283
10. Ballard D.H., Hayhoe M.M., and Pelz J.B. Memory representations in natural tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 7 (1995) 66-80
11. Ballard D.H., Hayhoe M.M., Pook P.K., and Rao R.P.N. Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1997) 723-767
12. Brown J. Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 10 (1958) 12-21
13. Burgess A., Jackson T.W., and Edwards J. Optimising the email communication environment. Managing modern organizations with information technology: IRMA 2005 proceedings (2005), IGP, Hershey
14. Card S.K., English W.K., and Burr B.J. Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics 21 (1978) 601-613
15. Cary M., and Carlson R.A. Distributing working memory resources during problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27 (2001) 836-848
16. Chase W.G., and Ericsson K.A. Skill and working memory. In: Bower G.H. (Ed). The psychology of learning and motivation 16 (1982), Academic Press, New York 1-58
17. Chase W.G., and Simon H.A. The mind's eye in chess. In: Chase W.G. (Ed). Visual information processing (1973), Academic Press, New York 215-281
18. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2nd ed. (1988), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
19. Coiera E., and Tombs V. Communication behaviours in a hospital setting: An observational study. British Medical Journal 316 (1998) 673-676
20. Cubesmart Inc. Social interruption and the loss of productivity (2002). http://www.interruptions.net/literature/CubeSmart-productivity-wp1.pdf Retrieved from: http://www.interruptions.net/literature/CubeSmart-productivity-wp1.pdf
21. Cutrell, E., Czerwinski, M., & Horvitz, E. (2001). Notification, disruption and memory: Effects of messaging interruptions on memory and performance. In M. Hirose (Ed.), Human-computer interaction - INTERACT 2001 (pp. 263-269). IOS Press, IFIP.
22. Cypher A. The structure of user's activities. In: Norman D.A., and Draper S.W. (Eds). User centred system design (1986), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 243-263
23. Czerwinski M., Chrisman S.E., and Rudisill M. Interruptions in multitasking situations: The effects of similarity and warning (Tech. Rep. No. JSC-24757) (1991), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Houston, TX
24. Czerwinski, M., Cutrell, E., & Horvitz, E. (2000). Instant messaging and interruption: Influence of task type on performance. In C. Paris, N. Ozkan, S. Howard, & S. Lu. (Eds.), OZCHI 2000 conference proceedings (pp. 356-361). Sydney, Australia.
25. Dasarathy B.V. Information Fusion - what, where, why, when, and how?. Information Fusion 2 (2001) 75-76
26. DeMarco T., and Lister T. Peopleware: Productive projects and teams. 2nd ed. (1999), Dorset House, New York
27. Dismukes K., Young K., and Sumwalt R. Cockpit interruptions and distractions: Effective management requires a careful balancing act. ASRS Directline 10 (1998) 4-9
28. Duggan G.B., and Payne S.J. Interleaving reading and acting while following procedural instructions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 7 (2001) 297-307
29. Edwards M.B., and Gronlund S.D. Task interruption and its effects on memory. Memory 6 (1998) 665-687
30. Einstein G.O., McDaniel M.A., Williford C.L., Pagan J.L., and Dismukes R.K. Forgetting of intentions in demanding situations is rapid. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 9 (2003) 147-162
31. Eyrolle H., and Cellier J.M. Some effects of interruptions in work activity: Field and laboratory results. Applied Ergonomics 31 (2000) 537-543
32. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A.-G., and Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavioural Research Methods 39 (2007) 175-191
33. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 2nd ed. (2005), London, Sage
34. Flynn E.A., Barker K.N., Gibson J.T., Pearson R.E., Berger B.A., and Smith L.A. Impact of interruptions and distractions on dispensing errors in an ambulatory care pharmacy. American Journal of Health System Pharmacy 56 (1999) 1319-1325
35. Franke, J., Daniels, J., & McFarlane, D. (2002). Recovering context after interruption. In W. Gray & C. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 310-315). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Fu W.-T., and Gray W.D. Memory versus perceptual-motor tradeoffs in a blocks world task. Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (2000), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 154-159
37. Gick M.L., and Holyoak K.J. The cognitive basis of knowledge transfer. In: Cornier S.M., and Hagman J.D. (Eds). Transfer of learning: Contemporary research and applications (1987), Academic Press, San Diego 9-47
38. Gillie T., and Broadbent D. What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity. Psychological Research 50 (1989) 243-250
39. Gillund G., and Shiffrin R.M. A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review 91 (1984) 1-65
40. Gray W.D., and Boehm-Davis D.A. Milliseconds matter: An introduction to microstrategies and their use in describing and predicting interactive behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 6 (2000) 322-335
41. Gray W.D., and Fu W.-T. Ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head: Implications of rational analysis for interface design. CHI Letters 3 (2001) 112-119
42. Gray W.D., and Fu W.-T. Soft constraints in interactive behaviour: The case of ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head. Cognitive Science 28 (2004) 359-383
43. Gray W.D., Sims C.R., Fu W.-T., and Schoelles M.J. The soft constraints hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behaviour. Psychological Review 113 (2006) 461-482
44. Griffon-Fouco M., and Ghertman F. Recueil de données sur les facteurs humains à l'Electricite de France. Operational safety of nuclear power plants (1984), International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna 157-172
45. Hernstein R.J., and Vaughn W. Melioration and behavioral allocation. In: Stadden J.E.R. (Ed). Limits to action: The allocation of behavior (1980), Academic Press, New York 143-176
46. Hodgetts, H. M., & Jones, D. M. (2003). Interruptions in the Tower of London task: Can preparation minimise disruption? Proceedings of the 47th annual meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 1000-1004). Santa Monica: HFES 03.
47. Hodgetts H.M., and Jones D.M. Contextual cues aid recovery from interruption: The role of associative activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32 (2006) 1120-1132
48. Hodgetts H.M., and Jones D.M. Interruption of the Tower of London task: Support for a goal-activation approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135 (2006) 103-115
49. Jackson T.W., Dawson R., and Wilson D. Evaluating the effect of email interruptions within the workplace. Conference on empirical assessment in software engineering (2002) 3-7
50. Jackson T.W., Dawson R., and Wilson D. Understanding email interaction increases organizational productivity. Communications of ACM 46 (2003) 80-84
51. Katz R. Automatic versus user controlled methods of briefly interrupting telephone calls. Human Factors 37 (1995) 321-334
52. Kirlik A. Modeling strategic behavior in human-automation interaction - why an aid can (and should) go unused. Human Factors 35 (1993) 221-242
53. Latorella, K. A. (1998). Effects of modality on interrupted flight deck performance: Implications for data link. Proceedings of the 42nd annual meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 249-253). Santa Monica, CA: HFES 98.
54. Latorella, K. A. (1996). Investigating interruptions: Implications for flightdeck performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. State University of New York at Buffalo.
55. Logie R.H. Visuo-spatial working memory (1995), Erlbaum, Hove
56. Loukopoulos L.D., Dismukes R.K., and Barshi I. Cockpit interruptions and distractions: A line observation study. In: Jensen R. (Ed). Proceedings of the 11th international symposium on aviation psychology (2001), Ohio State University Press, Columbus
57. Loukopoulos L.D., Dismukes R.K., and Barshi I. Concurrent task demands in the cockpit: Challenges and vulnerabilites in routine flight operations. Proceedings of the 12th international symposium on aviation psychology (2003), The Wright State University, Dayton 737-742
58. Lowenstein G., Read D., and Baumeister R. Time and decision: Economic and psychological perspectives on intertemporal choice (2003), Russell Sage Foundation, New York
59. MacKenzie I.S. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction 7 (1992) 91-139
60. McDaniel M.A., Einstein G.O., Graham T., and Rall E. Delaying execution of intentions: Overcoming the cost of interruptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology 18 (2004) 533-547
61. McFarlane D.C. Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction 17 (2002) 63-139
62. McFarlane D.C., and Latorella K.A. The scope and importance of human interruption in human-computer interaction design. Human-Computer Interaction 17 (2002) 1-61
63. Milewski A.E. Interruption management and telephone call screening. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 20 (2006) 19-33
64. Monk, C. A. (2004). The effect of frequent versus infrequent interruption on primary task resumption. Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society (pp. 295-299). Santa Monica, CA: HFES 04.
65. Monk, C. A., Boehm-Davis, D. A., & Trafton, J. G. (2002). The attentional costs of interrupting task performance at various stages. Proceedings of the 46th annual meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 1824-1828). Santa Monica, CA: HFES 02.
66. Monk C.A., Trafton J.G., and Boehm-Davis D.A. The effect of interruption duration and demand on resuming suspended goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 14 (2008) 299-313
67. NTSB. Aircraft accident report: Northwest Airlines Inc., McDonnell Douglas DC-9-82, N312RC, Detroit Metropolitan Wayne Country Airport, Romulus, MI, August 16th 1987 (NTSB/AAR-88/05) (1988, August 16th), National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC
68. O'Conaill B., and Frohlich D. Timespace in the workplace: Dealing with interruptions. Companion proceedings of CHI'95 (1995), ACM SIGCHI, New York 262-263
69. Osgood C.E. The similarity paradox in human learning: A resolution. Psychological Review 56 (1949) 132-143
70. Paquiot, J., Eyrolle, H., & Cellier, J. (1986). Conséquences de l'interférence entre les tâches de saisie sur la durée des traitements et l'occurrence des erreurs. In R. Patesson (Ed.), L'homme et L'écran (pp. 199-209). Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles.
71. Parasuraman R., and Riley V. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors 39 (1997) 230-253
72. Peterson L.R., and Peterson M.J. Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (1959) 193-198
73. Poulton E.C. Influential companions: Effects of one strategy on another in the within-subjects designs of cognitive psychology. Psychological Bulletin 9 (1982) 673-690
74. Raaijmakers J.G.W., and Shiffrin R.M. SAM: A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory. In: Bower G.H. (Ed). The psychology of learning and motivation 14 (1980), Academic Press, New York 207-262
75. Rasmussen J., and Vicente K.J. Coping with human errors through system design: Implications for ecological interface design. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 31 (1989) 517-534
76. Russell E., Purvis L.M., and Banks A. Describing the strategies used for dealing with email interruptions according to different situational parameters. Computers in Human Behavior 23 (2007) 1820-1837
77. Speier C., Valacich J.S., and Vessey I. The influence of task interruption on individual decision making: An information overload perspective. Decision Sciences 30 (1999) 337-360
78. Tabachnick B.G., and Fidell L.S. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. (2001), Allyn & Bacon, Boston
79. Thorndike E.L., and Woodworth R.S. The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. Psychological Review 8 (1901) 247-261 384-, 395, 553-564
80. Trafton, J. G., Altmann, E. M., & Brock, D. P. (2005). Huh, what was I doing? How people use environmental cues after an interruption. Proceedings of the 49th annual meeting of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society (pp. 468-472). Santa Monica: HFES 05.
81. Trafton J.G., Altmann E.M., Brock D.P., and Mintz F.E. Preparing to resume an interrupted task: Effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58 (2003) 583-603
82. Tucker A.L., and Spear S.J. Operational failures and interruptions in hospital nursing. Health Services Research 41 (2006) 643-662
83. Vicente K.J., and Rasmussen J. Ecological interface design: Theoretical foundations. IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics (1992) 589-606 SMC-22
84. Waldron S.M., Patrick J., Duggan G.B., Banbury S., and Howes A. Designing information fusion for the encoding of visual-spatial information. Ergonomics 51 (2008) 775-797
85. Waldron S.M., Patrick J., Morgan P.L., and King S.L. Influencing cognitive strategy by manipulating information access costs. The Computer Journal 50 (2007) 694-702
86. Wilson M. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9 (2002) 625-636
87. Woods, D. D., Wise, J., & Hanes, L. (1981). An evaluation of nuclear power plant safety parameter display systems. Proceedings of the Human Factors 25th Annual Meeting (pp. 110-114). Santa Monica, CA: HFES 81.
88. Zijlstra F.R.H., Roe R.A., Leonora A.B., and Krediet I. Temporal factors in mental work: Effects of interrupted activities. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology 72 (1999) 163-185