Interleaving reading and acting while following procedural instructions

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 297-307

  Duggan, Geoffrey B ^a   Payne, Stephen J ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; RANDOMIZATION; READING; TEACHING; TIME;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; RANDOM ALLOCATION; READING; TEACHING; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0035752041     PISSN: 1076898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1076-898X.7.4.297     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Bovair, S., & Kieras, D. E. (1985). A guide to prepositional analysis for research on technical prose. In B. K. Britton & J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text (pp. 315-362). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Carroll, J. M. (1990). The Nurnberg Funnel: Designing minimalist instruction for practical computer skill. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Diehl, V. A., & Mills, C. B. (1995). The effects of interaction with the device described by procedural text on recall, true/false, and task performance. Memory & Cognition, 23, 675-688.
6. Gray, W. D., & Boehm-Davis, D. A. (2000). Milliseconds matter: An introduction to microstrategies and to their use in describing and predicting interactive behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 322-335.
7. Gray, W. D., & Fu, W.-T. (2001). Ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head: Implications of rational analysis for interface design. CHI Letters, 3, 112-119.
8. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1-43.
10. Mills, C. B., Diehl, V. A., Birkmire, D. P., & Mou, L.-C. (1995). Reading procedural texts: Effects of purpose for reading and predictions of reading comprehension models. Discourse Processes, 20, 79-107.
11. O'Hara, K. P., & Payne, S. J. (1998). The effects of operator implementation cost on planfulness of problem solving and learning. Cognitive Psychology, 35, 34-70.
12. O'Hara, K. P., & Payne, S. J. (1999). Planning and user interface: The effects of lockout time and error recovery cost. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 50, 41-59.
13. Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207-217.
14. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185.