Grounding co-occurrence: Identifying features in a lexical co-occurrence model of semantic memory

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1210-1223

  Buchanan, Lori ^a   Dura, Kevin ^a   Caron, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMAN; MEMORY; PHYSIOLOGY; RECALL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEMANTICS;

ALGORITHMS; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMANS; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEMANTICS;

EID: 74949125948     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1210     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. ANDREWS, M., VIGLIOCCO, G., & VINSON, D. (2005). Integrating attributional and distributional information in a probabilistic model of meaning representation. In T. Honkela, V Könönen, M. Pöllä, & O. Simula (Eds.), Proceedings of the International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Adaptive Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (pp. 15-25). Espoo, Finland.
2. ANDREWS, M., VIGLIOCCO, G., & VINSON, D. (2007). Evaluating the contribution of intra-linguistic and extra-linguistic data to the structure of human semantic representations. In D. S. McNamara & J. G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 767-772). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
3. ANDREWS, M., VIGLIOCCO, G., & VINSON, D. (2009). Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. Psychological Review, 116, 463-498.
4. BARSALOU, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645.
5. BURGESS, C. (1998). From simple associations to the building blocks of language: Modeling meaning in memory with the HAL model. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 188-198.
6. BURGESS, C. (2000). Theory and operational definitions in computational memory models: A response to Glenberg and Robertson. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 402-408.
7. BURGESS, C. (2001). Representing and resolving semantic ambiguity: A contribution from high-dimensional memory modeling. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 233-260). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8. BURGESS, C., & LUND, K. (1997a). Modelling parsing constraints with high-dimensional context space. Language & Cognitive Processes, 12, 177-210.
9. BURGESS, C., & LUND, K. (1997b). Representing abstract words and emotional connotation in a high-dimensional memory space. In M. G. Shafto & P. Langley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 61-66). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. BURGESS, C., & LUND, K. (2000). The dynamics of meaning in memory. In E. Dietrich & A. B. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics (pp. 117-156). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. COLLINS, A. M., & LOFTUS, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
12. COLLINS, A. M., & QUILLIAN, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-247.
13. DAMERAU, P. (1993). Generating and evaluating domain-oriented multi-word terms from texts. Information Processing & Management, 29, 433-448.
14. DURDA, K., & BUCHANAN, L. (2008). WINDSORS: Windsor improved norms of distance and similarity of representations of semantics. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 705-712.
15. ELMAN, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179-211.
16. FELLBAUM, C. (1998). WordNet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. FERRAND, L., & NEW, B. (2004). Semantic and associative priming in the mental lexicon. In P. Bonin (Ed.), Mental lexicon: Some words to talk about words (pp. 25-43). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
18. FRENCH, R. M., & LABIOUSE, C. (2002). Four problems with extracting human semantics from large text corpora. In W. D. Gray & C. D. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 316-322). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. GLENBERG, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 20, 1-55.
20. GLENBERG, A. M., & ROBERTSON, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 379-401.
21. GRIFFITHS, T. L., & STEYVERS, M. (2002). A probabilistic approach to semantic representation. In W. D. Gray & C. D. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 381-386). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. GRIFFITHS, T. L., & STEYVERS, M. (2003). Prediction and semantic association. In S. Becker, S. Thrun, & K. Obermayer (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 15 (pp. 11-18). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. GRIFFITHS, T. L., STEYVERS, M., & TENENBAUM, J. B. (2007). Topics in semantic representation. Psychological Review, 114, 211-244.
24. HARM, M. W., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662-720.
25. HINTON, G. E., MCCLELLAND, J. L., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1986). Distributed representations. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol.I. Foundations (pp. 77-109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. HINTON, G. E., & SHALLICE, T. (1991). Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia. Psychological Review, 98, 74-95.
27. HOLLAND, J. H. (1992). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. HOWELL, S. R., JANKOWICZ, D., & BECKER, S. (2005). A model of grounded language acquisition: Sensorimotor features improve lexical and grammatical learning. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 258-276.
29. JONES, M. N., KINTSCH, W., & MEWHORT, D. J. K. (2006). High-dimensional semantic space accounts of priming. Journal of Memory & Language, 55, 534-552.
30. JONES, M. N., & MEWHORT, D. J. K. (2007). Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychological Review, 114, 1-37.
31. KULLBACK, S., & LEIBLER, R. A. (1951). On information and sufficiency. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22, 79-86.
32. LANDAUER, T. K., & DUMAIS, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
33. LEMAIRE, B., & DENHIÉRE, G. (2004). Incremental construction of an associative network from a corpus. In K. D. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 825-830). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. LOUWERSE, M. M. (2007). Symbolic or embodied representations: A case for symbol interdependency. InT. K. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysts (pp. 107-120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. LOUWERSE, M. M. (2008). Embodied relations are encoded in language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 838-844.
36. LOUWERSE, M. M., CAI, Z., HU, X., VENTURA, M., & JEUNIAUX, P. (2006). Cognitively inspired natural-language based knowledge representations: Further explorations of latent semantic analysis. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Tools, 15, 1021-1040.
37. LUND, K., & BURGESS, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods. Instruments, & Computers, 28, 203-208.
38. MARTIN, A., & CHAO, L. L. (2001). Semantic memory and the brain: Structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 194-201.
39. MCNAMARA, T. P., & HOLBROOK, J. B. (2003). Semantic memory and priming. In I. B. Weiner (Series Ed.) & A. F. Healy & R. W. Proctor (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol.4. Experimental psychology (pp. 447-474). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
40. MCRAE, K., CREE, G. S., SEIDENBERG, M. S., & MCNORGAN, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 547-559.
41. MCRAE, K., CREE, G. S., WESTMACOTT, R., & DE SA, V. R. (1999). Further evidence for feature correlations in semantic memory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 360-373.
42. MCRAE, K., DE SA, V. R., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 99-130.
43. PEXMAN, P. M., HOLYK, G. G., & MONFILS, M.-H. (2003). Number-of-features effects and semantic processing. Memory & Cognition, 31, 842-855.
44. PLAUT, D. C. (1995). Semantic and associative priming in a distributed attractor network. In J. D. Moore & J. F. Lehman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 37-42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. PLAUT, D. C., & BOOTH, J. R. (2000). Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: Empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. Psychological Review, 107,786-823.
46. PLAUT, D. C., & SHALLICE, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377-500.
47. RIORDAN, B., & JONES, M. N. (in press). Redundancy in perceptual and linguistic experience: Comparing feature-based and distributional models of semantic representation. Topics in Cognitive Science.
48. RODD, J. M., GASKELL, M. G., & MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D. (2004). Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition. Cognitive Science, 28, 89-104.
49. ROGERS, T. T., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (2004). Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. ROHDE, D. L. T., GONNERMAN, L. M., & PLAUT, D. C. (2004). An improved method for deriving word meaning from lexical co-occurrence. Unpublished manuscript.
51. RUMELHART, D. E. (1990). Brain style computation: Learning and generalization. In S. F. Zornetzer, J. L. Davis, & C. Lau (Eds.), An introduction to neural and electronic networks (pp. 405-420). San Diego: Academic Press.
52. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol.1: Foundations (pp. 318-362). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. RUMELHART, D. E., & TODD, P. M. (1993). Learning and connectionist representations. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 3-30). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. SAFFRAN, E. M. (2000). The organization of semantic memory: In support of a distributed model. Brain & language, 71, 204-212.
55. SCHÜTZE, H. (1992). Dimensions of meaning. In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (pp. 787-796). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
56. SCHÜTZE, H. (1998). Automatic word sense discrimination. Computational Linguistics, 24, 97-124.
57. Shaoul, C., & Westbury, C. (2006). Word frequency effects in high-dimensional co-occurrence models: A new approach. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 190-195.
58. SHAOUL, C., WESTBURY, C. (2008a). Performance of HAL-like word space models on semantic clustering. In M. Baroni & A. Lenci (Eds.), ESSLLI lexical semantics workshop: Bridging the gap between semantic theory and computational simulations (pp. 42-46). Hamburg: ESSLLI.
59. SHAOUL, C., & WESTBURY, C. (2008b). A USENET corpus (2005-2008). Edmonton, Alberta: University of Alberta. Retrieved from www .psych.ualberta.ca/̃westburylab/downloads/usenetcorpus.download.html.
60. SITNIKOVA, T., WEST, W. C., KUPERBERG, G. R., & HOLCOMB, P. J. (2006). The neural organization of semantic memory: Electrophysiological activity suggests feature-based segregation. Biological Psychology, 71, 326-340.
61. SLOMAN, S. A. (1998). Categorical inference is not a tree: The myth of inheritance hierarchies. Cognitive Psychology, 35, 1-33.
62. STEYVERS, M., & TENENBAUM, J. B. (2005). The large-scale structure of semantic networks: Statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth. Cognitive Science, 29, 41-78.
63. VIGLIOCCO, G., WARREN, J., SIRI, S., ARCTULI, J., SCOTT, S., & WISE, R. (2006). The role of semantics and grammatical class in the neural representation of words. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 1790-1796.