Cognitively inspired NLP-based knowledge representations: Further explorations of latent semantic analysis

International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1021-1039

  Louwerse, Max ^a,b   Cai, Zhiqiang ^a   Hu, Xiangen ^a   Ventura, Matthew ^a   Jeuniaux, Patrick ^a  

^a Institute for Intelligent Systems   (United States)

^b University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

Knowledge representation; Latent semantic analysis; Semantic similarity

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845606355     PISSN: 02182130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0218213006003090     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (58)

1. M. Quillian. Semantic memory (Bolt, Beranek, & Newman, Cambridge, 1966).
2. A. Collins and M. Quillian, Retrieval time from semantic memory, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8 (1969), 240-248
3. E. Smith, E. Shoben, and L. Rips, Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions, Psychological Review 81 (1974) 214-241.
4. M. Minsky, A framework for representing knowledge. The psychology of computer vision, ed. P. Winston (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975), 211-277.
5. D. Rumelhart and A. Ortony, The representation of knowledge in memory, Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge, eds. R. Anderson, R. Spiro and W. Montague, W. (Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1977), pp. 99-135.
6. R.C. Schank and R.P. Abelson, Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 1977).
7. B.R. Gaines, Class library implementation of an open architecture knowledge support system, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 41 (1994), 59-107.
8. D.G. Bobrow and T. Winograd, An overview of KRL, a knowledge representation language, Cognitive Science 1, (1977), 3-46.
9. R.E. Fikes and T. Kehler, The role of frame-based representation in knowledge representation and reasoning, Communications of the ACM 28 (1985), 904-920.
10. R.J. Brachman, V. P. Gilbert and H. J. Levesque, An essential hybrid reasoning system, Proceedings IJCAI-85 (1985), 532-539.
11. B. Nebel, Computational complexity of terminological reasoning in BACK, Artificial Intelligence 34 (1988), 371-383.
12. R.M. MacGregor, The evolving technology of classification-based knowledge representation systems, Principles of semantic networks: Explorations in the representation of knowledge. Ed. J.F. Sowa (Morgan-Kaufman, San Mateo, 1991), pp. 385-400.
13. A. Borgida, R.J. Brachman, D.L. McGuiness and L.A. Resnick, CLASSIC: a structural data model for objects, Proceedings of 1989 SIGMOD Conference on the Management of Data (ACM Press, New York, 1989), pp.58-67.
14. F. Baader and B. Hollunder, KRIS: Knowledge representation and inference system, ACM SIGART Bulletin 2 (1991), 8-14.
15. D.B. Lenat and R. V. Guha, Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems (Reading, Addison-Wesley, 1990).
16. F. Gomez (2000). Why base the knowledge representation language on natural language? Journal of Intelligent Systems, 10.
17. G.A. Miller, ed., WordNet: An on-line lexical database, International Journal of Lexicography 3 (1990), 235-312.
18. V. Rus and D.I. Moldovan, High precision logic form transformation, International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 11 (2002), 437-454.
19. M. Pasca and S. Harabagiu, The informative role of WordNet in open-domain question answering, Proceedings of the NAACL 2001 Workshop on WordNet and Other Lexical Resources: Applications, Extensions and Customization (Carnegie Mellon University, 2001), 138-143.
20. A.C. Graesser, D.S. McNamara, M.M. Louwerse and Z. Cai, Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36 (2004), 193-202.
21. W. Lewis, Measuring conceptual distance using WordNet: The design of a metric for measuring semantic similarity, R. Hayes, W. Lewis, E. Obryan, and T. Zamuner, eds., The University of Arizona working papers in linguistics (University of Arizona, 2002).
22. G. Vigliocco, D. Vinson, W. Lewis and M. Garrett, Representing the meaning of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space (FUSS) hypothesis, Cognitive Psychology 48 (2004), 422-488.
23. K. Lund and C. Burgess, Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical cooccurrence, Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers 28 (1998), 203-208.
24. T.K. Landauer and S.T. Dumais, A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge, Psychological Review 104 (1997), 211-240.
25. X. Hu, Z. Cai, M.M. Louwerse, A. Olney, P. Penumatsa, A.C. Graesser and TRG Proceedings of the 2003 International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1489-1491) (2003).
26. X. Hu, Z. Cai, D. Franceschetti, P. Penumatsa, A.C. Graesser, M.M. Louwerse, D.S. McNamara, D.S., & TRG, LSA: The first dimension and dimensional weighting, Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, eds. R. Alterman and D. Hirsh (Cognitive Science Society, Boston, 2003), pp. 587-592.
27. M.W. Berry, S.T. Dumais, G.W. O' Brien, Using linear algebra for Intelligent Information Retrieval, SIAM Review 37 (1995), 573-595.
28. S. Deerwester, S.T. Dumais, G.W. Furnas, T.K. Landauer and R. Harshman, Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 391-407 (1990).
29. S.T. Dumais in The Second Text Retrieval Conference (TREC2), ed. Harman, D. (Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., Gaithersburg, MD, 1994), pp. 105-116.
30. T.K. Landauer, P.W. Foltz and D. Laham, An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 25 (1998), 259-284.
31. E. Kintsch, D. Steinhart, G. Stahl and the LSA Research Group, Developing summarization skills through the use of LSA-based feedback. Interactive Learning Environments 8 (2000) 87-109.
32. A.C. Graesser, K. VanLehn, C. Rose, P. Jordan and D. Harter, Intelligent tutoring systems with coversational dialogue. AI Magazine 22 (2001), 39-51.
33. A.C. Graesser, P. Wiemer-Hastings, K. Wiemer-Hastings, D. Harter, N. Person and the TRG, Using latent semantic analysis to evaluate the contributions of students in AutoTutor. Interactive Learning Environments 8 (2000), 128-148.
34. A.C. Graesser, S. Lu, G.T. Jackson, H. Mitchell, M. Ventura, A. Olney and M.M. Louwerse, AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36 (2004), 180-193.
35. P.W. Foltz, W. Kintsch, and T.K. Landauer, The measurement of textual coherence with Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25 (1998), 285-307.
36. W. Kintsch, Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 7 (2000), 257-266.
37. W. Kintsch (2002) On the notions of theme and topic in psychological process models of text comprehension, Thematics: Interdisciplinary Studies, M. Louwerse and W. van Peer, eds., (Benjamins, Amsterdam, 2002), pp. 157-170.
38. W. Kintsch, Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1998).
39. M.M. Louwerse, Semantic variation in idiolect and sociolect: Corpus linguistic evidence from literary texts. Computers and the Humanities 38 (2004), 207-221.
40. M.M. Louwerse, P.M. McCarthy, D.S. McNamara and A.C. Graesser, Variations in language and cohesion across written and spoken registers, Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, K. Forbus, D. Gentner, T. Regier, eds. (Erlbaum, Mahwah, 2004), pp. 843-848.
41. D. Biber, Variations across speech and writing (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988).
42. th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, eds. R. Alterman and D. Hirsh (Cognitive Science Society, Boston, 2003).
43. T.K. Landauer, Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA), a disembodied learning machine, acquires human word meaning vicariously from language alone. Commentary on Barsalou, Behavior and Brain Sciences 22 (1999), 624-625.
44. T.K. Landauer, On the computational basis of learning and cognition: Arguments from LSA. In N. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation 41 (2002), 43-84.
45. M.M. Louwerse and M. Ventura, How children learn the meaning of words and how computers do it (too). Journal of the Learning Sciences 14 (2005), 301-309.
46. L.W. Barsalou, Perceptual symbol systems. Behavior and Brain Sciences 22 (1999), 577-660.
47. A.M. Glenberg and D. A. Robertson, Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language 43 (2000), 379-401.
48. M.M. Louwerse, Iconicity in amodal symbolic representations, LSA: A road to meaning, T. Landauer, D. McNamara, S. Dennis & W. Kintsch, eds. (Erlbaum, Mahwah, in press).
49. T. Deacon, The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the human brain (Allen Lane, London, 1997)
50. C.S. Peirce, The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, eds. C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss and A. Burks (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1931-58).
51. T. Deacon (1997: 90)
52. E. Rosch, On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories, Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, T.E. Moore, eds. (Academic Press, New York, 1973), pp. 111-144
53. E. Rosch and C. Mervis, Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structures of categories, Cognitive Psychology 7 (1975), 573-605.
54. D. Laham, Latent Semantic Analysis approaches to categorization, Proceedings of the 19th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, eds. M.G. Shafto and P. Langley (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, Mahwah, 1997), p. 979).
55. M.M. Louwerse, Z. Cai, X. Hu, M. Ventura, P. Jeuniaux, The embodiment of amodal symbolic knowledge representations, Proceedings of the 18th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society, eds. J. Russell and Z. Markov (AAAI Press, Menlo Park, 2005), pp. 542-47.
56. J.B. Kruskal and M. Wish, Multidimensional scaling (Sage University Series, Beverly Hills, 1978).
57. R.A. Zwaan, Experiential traces and mental simulations in language comprehension (under review).
58. M.M. Louwerse and P. Jeuniaux, Language comprehension is both embodied and symbolic! (under review).