Theory and Operational Definitions in Computational Memory Models: A Response to Glenberg and Robertson

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 402-408

  Burgess, Curt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042995283     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2715     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Audet C., Burgess C. Using a high-dimensional memory model to evaluate the properties of abstract and concrete words. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society. 1999;Erlbaum, Hillsdale. p. 37-42.
2. Burgess C., Conley P. Representing proper names and objects in a common semantic space: A computational model. Brain and Cognition. 40:1999;67-70.
3. Burgess, C, &, Lund, K. 1997, Representing abstract words and emotional connotation in high-dimensional memory space. In, Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp, 61, - 66, ), Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.
4. Burgess C., Lund K. Modelling parsing constraints with high-dimensional context space. Language and Cognitive Process. 12:1997;177-210.
5. Burgess C., Lund K. Modeling cerebral asymmetries of semantic memory using high-dimensional semantic space. Beeman M., Chiarello C. Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. 1998;215-244 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
6. Burgess C., Lund K. The dynamics of meaning in memory. Dietrich E., Markman A. Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual and representational change in humans and machines. 2000;117-156 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
7. Burgess C., Lund K., Kromsky A. Examining issues in developmental pycholinguistics with a high-dimensional memory model. Psychonomics Society Abstracts. 2:1997;66.
8. Foltz P. W. Latent semantic analysis for text-based research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers. 28:1996;197-202.
9. Glenberg A. M., Robertson D. A. Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language. 43:2000;379-401.
10. Kaschak, M. P, &, Glenberg, A. M. 1999, Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Manuscript in preparation.
11. Kintsch, W. (in press-a), Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
12. Kintsch, W. (in press-b), Predication, Cognitive Science.
13. Landauer, T. K. 1998, How modern computation can turn cognitive psychology into a real science. Keynote address at the 28th annual conference of the Society for Computers in Psychology (SCiP), Dallas, TX.
14. Landauer T. K., Dumais S. T. A solution to Plato's Problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Bulletin. 104:1997;211-240.
15. Li, P, Burgess, C, &, Lund, K. in press, The acquisition of word meaning through global lexical co-occurrences. In, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Child Language Research Forum, Stanford, CA, Center for the Study of Language and Information.
16. Lund K., Burgess C. Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Models, Instrumentation, and Computers. 28:1996;203-208.
17. Lund K., Burgess C., Atchley R. A. Semantic and associative priming in high-dimensional semantic space. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society. 1995;Erlbaum, Hillsdale. p. 660-665.
18. Lund K., Burgess C., Audet C. Dissociating semantic and associative word relationships using high-dimensional semantic space. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society. 1996;Erlbaum, Hillsdale. p. 603-608.
19. Maxwell A. The Singer enigma. 1976;Popular Library, New York.
20. Miikkulainen R. Subsymbolic natural language processing: An integrated model of scripts, lexicon, and memory. 1993;The MIT Press, Cambridge.
21. Miikkulainen, R, &, Aguirre-Celis, N. 1999. Personal communication.
22. Miller G. A., Charles W. G. Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Language and Cognitive Processes. 6:1991;1-28.
23. Morrow R., Peterson R., Burgess C., Eakins J. An initial computational analysis of figurative language: The role of density in idiomatic and metaphoric expressions. Psychonomics Society Abstracts. 4:1999;11.
24. Wolfe M., Schreiner M. E., Rehder B., Laham D., Foltz P. W., Kintsch W., Landauer T. K. Learning from text: Matching readers and texts by Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes. 25:1998;309-336.