Supporting active cognitive processing in collaborative groups: The potential of Bloom's taxonomy as a labeling tool

Internet and Higher Education

Volumn 12, Issue 3-4, 2009, Pages 165-172

  Valcke, Martin ^a   De Wever, Bram ^a,b   Zhu, Chang ^a   Deed, Craig ^c  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b RESEARCH FOUNDATION FLANDERS FWO   (Belgium)

^c LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Affective involvement; Bloom; Cognitive processing; CSCL; Metacognition; Scripting

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE COGNITIVE PROCESSING; ASYNCHRONOUS ONLINE DISCUSSION; BLOOM'S TAXONOMY; COGNITIVE PROCESSING; COLLABORATIVE GROUPS; COLLABORATIVE PROCESS; COLLABORATIVE WORK; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; EDUCATIONAL SCIENCE; EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; HIGHER-DEGREE; METACOGNITION; METACOGNITIVES; SHORT PERIODS; UNIVERSITY STUDENTS;

BLOOMS (METAL); CESIUM ALLOYS; TAXONOMIES;

STUDENTS;

EID: 74249095144     PISSN: 10967516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Anderson L., and Krathwohl D. A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives (2001), Longman, New York
2. Anderson L.W., Krathwohl D.R., Airasian P.W., Cruikshank K.A., Mayer R.E., Pintrich P.R., et al. A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives (2001), Longman, New York
3. Archer W., Garrison D.R., Anderson T., and Rourke L. A framework for analysing critical thinking in computer conferences. In: Dillenbourg P., Eurelings A., and Hakkarainen K. (Eds). European Perspectives on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Proceedings of the First European Conference on CSCL (2001), McLuhan Institute, University of Maastricht, Maastricht
4. Baker M. Argumentation and cognitive change in collaborative problemsolving dialogues. Coast Research Report Number CR-13/96 (1996), CNRS, Lyon
5. Bloom B.S. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain (1956), David McKay Co Inc, New York
6. Bloom B.S. Taxonomy of educational objectives (1984), Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA
7. Bloom B.S., Engelhart M.D., Furst E.J., Hill W.H., and Krathwohl D.R. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain (1956), David McKay, New York
8. Brown A. Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In: Weinert F.E., and Kluwe R. (Eds). Metacognition, motivation and understanding (1987), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale 65-116
9. Chan C.C., Tsui M.S., Chan M.Y.C., and Hong J.H. Applying the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) Taxonomy on student's learning outcomes: An empirical study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (2002) 511-527
10. De Wever B., Schellens T., Valcke M., and Van Keer H. Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers and Education 46 (2006) 6-28
11. De Wever B., Schellens T., Van Keer H., and Valcke M. Structuring asynchronous discussion groups by introducing roles: Do students act up to the assigned roles?. Small Group Research 39 (2008) 770-794
12. De Wever B., Van Winckel M., and Valcke M. Discussing patient management online: The impact of roles on knowledge construction for students interning at the paediatric ward. Advances in Health Sciences Education 13 (2008) 25-42
13. Dillenbourg P. Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In: Kirschner P.A. (Ed). Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? (2002), Open Universiteit Nederland, Heerlen 61-91
14. Doise W., and Mugny G. The social development of the intellect (1984), Pergamon Press, Oxford
15. Erkens, G. (1997). Cooperative problem solving through computers: Modeling cooperative dialogues to develop intelligent educational systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht.
16. Erstad O. Professional learning in a changing society: Teacher professionalism and epistemic agency - the challenge of new technologies (2004). http://www.pfi.uio.no/konferanse/prof_learning/docs/pdf/Paper/Gruppe%201/Erstad%20-%20paper.pdf Working paper retrieved from http://www.pfi.uio.no/konferanse/prof_learning/docs/pdf/Paper/Gruppe%201/Erstad%20-%20paper.pdf on August 15, 2009
17. Ertl B., and Mandl H. Effects of an individual's prior knowledge on collaborative knowledge construction and individual learning outcomes in videoconferencing. Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning Sciences - Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning sciences (2006). http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1150034.1150058 Retrieved from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1150034.1150058 on April 15, 2009
18. Fischer F., Kollar I., Haake J., and Mandl H. Perspectives on collaboration scripts. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 6 (2007) 1-10
19. In: Fischer F., Mandl H., Haake J., and Kollar I. (Eds). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives. Computer-supported collaborative learning book series vol. 6 (2006), Springer Publishers, Dordrecht
20. Gilbert P.K., and Dabbagh N. How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology 36 (2005) 5-18
21. Hakkinen P. Collaborative learning in technology-supported environments: Two cases of project-enhanced science learning. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning 11 (2001) 375-390
22. Hamalainen R. Designing and evaluating collaboration in a virtual game environment for vocational learning. Computers and Education 50 1 (2008) 98-109
23. Harper B., Squires D., and McDougall A. Constructivist simulations: A new design paradigm. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 9 (2000) 115-130
24. Hattie J. Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement (2009), Routledge, Oxford
25. Henri F. Computer conferencing and content analysis. In: Kaye A.R. (Ed). Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (1992), Springer-Verlag, New York 115-136
26. Jacobson D.M. Building different bridges: Technology integration, engaged student learning, and new approaches to professional development. Paper presented at AERA 2001: What we know and how we know it, the 82nd Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA, April 10-14 (2001)
27. Johnson D.W., and Johnson R.T. Cooperation and the use of technology. In: Jonassen D.H. (Ed). Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (1996), Prentice Hall International, London 1017-1044
28. King A. Transactive peer tutoring: Distributing cognition and metacognition. Educational Psychology Review 10 (1998) 57-74
29. Kollar I., Fischer F., and Hesse F.W. Cooperation scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. In: Wasson B., Baggetun R., Hoppe U., and Ludvigsen S. (Eds). Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning -CSCL 2003 (2003), Intermedia, Bergen 59-61
30. Kollar I., Fischer F., and Hesse F. Collaboration scripts - A conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review 18 2 (2006) 159-185
31. Kollar I., Fischer F., and Slotta J.D. Internal and external collaboration scripts in web-based science learning at schools. In: Koschman T., Suthers D., and Chan T.W. (Eds). Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 years! (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 331-340
32. Krathwohl D.R. A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice 41 (2002) 212-218
33. Kreijns K., and Bitter-Rijkema M. An exploration of the Virtual Business Team concept: Constructivism and the support for social negotiation (2002). http://www.ouh.nl/info-alg-vb/docs/defEuroCSCL%20KreijnsBitter.doc Retrieved from http://www.ouh.nl/info-alg-vb/docs/defEuroCSCL%20KreijnsBitter.doc on July 2, 2009
34. Kunen S., Cohen R., and Solman R. A levels-of-processing analysis of Bloom's Taxonomy. Journal of Educational Psychology 73 (1981) 202-211
35. Land S.M. The design and evaluation of a CSCL tool to support reflection and revision of design projects. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 16 (2008) 68-92
36. Lazonder A.W., Wilhelm P., and Ootes S.A.W. Using sentence openers to foster student interaction in computer-mediated learning environments. Computers and Education 41 (2003) 291-308
37. Lipponen L., Rahikainen M., Lallimo J., and Hakkarainen K. Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students' computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction 13 (2003) 487-509
38. Lockhorst D., Admiraal W., Pilot A., and Veen W. Design elements for a CSCL environment in a teacher training programme. Education and Information Technologies 7 (2002) 377-384
39. Lugano G., Nokelainen P., Miettinen M., Kurhila J., and Tirri H. On the relationship between learners' orientations and activity in CSCL. HIIT Technical Reports 2004-9 (2004), Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Helsinki (Finland)
40. Ma A. Computer supported collaborative learning and higher order thinking skills: A case study of textile studies. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects 5 (2009) 145-167
41. Mäkitalo K., Weinberger A., Häkkinen P., and Fischer F. Uncertainty-reducing cooperation scripts in online learning environments (2004). http://www.iwm-kmrc.de/workshops/%20sim2004/pdf_files/Makitalo_et%20al.pdf Retrieved July 14, 2004, from http://www.iwm-kmrc.de/workshops/ sim2004/pdf_files/Makitalo_et al.pdf
42. Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2007). The New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage/Corwin Press.
43. Mayer R.E. Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into Practice 41 (2002) 226-232
44. Meyer K.A. Evaluating online discussions. Four different frames of analysis. Journal for Asynchronous Learning Networks 8 (2004) 101-114
45. Moore M.G. What does research say about the learners using computer-mediated communication in distance learning?. American Journal of Distance Education 16 (2002) 61-64
46. Nachmias R., Mioduser D., Oren A., and Ram J. Web-supported emergent-collaboration in higher education courses. Educational Technology & Society 3 (2000) 94-104
47. Newbern D., and Dansereau D. Evolutions in scripted co-operative learning: Emotional competence. In: Falchikov N., and Blythman M. (Eds). Learning together, peer tutoring in higher education (2001), Routledge, London, New York 257-260
48. O'Donnell A.M., Dansereau D.F., Hall R.H., and Rocklin T.R. Cognitive, social/affective, and meta-cognitive outcomes of scripted cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 79 (1987) 431-437
49. Pena-Shaff J.B., and Nicholls C. Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers and Education 42 (2004) 243-265
50. Petraglia J. The rhetoric and technology of authenticity in education (1997), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
51. Pifarré M., and Cobos R. Evaluation of the development of metacognitive knowledge supported by the knowcat system. Educational Technology Research and Development (2009). http://www.springerlink.com/content/87v06t9523380k72/ 10.1007/s11423-009-9118-9 Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/content/87v06t9523380k72/ on June 15, 2009
52. Quinn, C. N. (1997). Engaging learning. ITForum Paper #18. Retrieved July 12, 2004, from http://itech1.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper18/paper18.html
53. Rummel N., and Spada H. Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences 14 (2005) 201-241
54. Savery J., and Duffy T.M. Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In: Wilson B. (Ed). Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (1996), Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
55. Scardamalia M. Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In: Jones B. (Ed). Liberal education in the knowledge age (2002), Open Court, Chicago 67-98
56. Scardamalia M., and Bereiter C. Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In: Sawyer K. (Ed). Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2006), Cambridge University Press, New York 97-118
57. Schellens T., and Valcke M. Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive process?. Computers in Human Behaviour 21 (2005) 957-975
58. Schellens T., and Valcke M. Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups. Computers and Education 46 (2006) 349-370
59. Schellens T., Van keer H., De Wever B., and Valcke M. Scripting by assigning roles: Does it improve knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups?. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2 (2007) 225-246
60. Schellens T., Van Keer H., De Wever B., and Valcke M. Tagging thinking types in asynchronous discussion groups: Effects on critical thinking. International Journal of Interactive Learning Environments 17 (2009) 77-94
61. Schrire S. Knowledge building in asynchronous learning groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis. Computers and Education 46 (2006) 49-70
62. Schweizer K., Paechter M., and Weidenmann B. Blended learning as a strategy to improve collaborative task performance. Learning, Media and Technology 28 2 (2003) 211-224
63. Slavin R.E. Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology 21 1 (1996) 43-69
64. Spiro R.J., Coulson R.L., Feltovich P.J., and Anderson D. Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In: Patel V. (Ed). Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (1988), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
65. Veldhuis-Diermanse, A. E. (2002). CSCLearning? Participation, learning activities and knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Wageningen (The Netherlands): Wageningen University and Research Center Publications.
66. Vermunt, J. D. (1992). Leerstijlen en sturen van leerprocessen in het hoger onderwijs. Naar procesgerichte instructie in zelfstandig denken [Learning styles and regulating of learning in higher education: Towards process-oriented instruction in autonomous thinking]. PHdissertation. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
67. Vonderwell S., and Zachariah S. Factors that influence participation in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 38 (2005) 213-230
68. Vygotsky L.S. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (1978), Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
69. Weinberger, A. (2003). Scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Effects of social and epistemic collaboration scripts on collaborative knowledge construction. Doctoral thesis. Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich. Retrieved from http://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/archive/00001120/01/Weinberger_Armin.pdf on July 1, 2009.
70. Weinberger A., Reiserer M., Ertl B., Fischer F., and Mandl H. Facilitating collaborative knowledge construction in computer-mediated learning environments with cooperation scripts. In: Bromme R., Hesse F.W., and Spada H. (Eds). Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication (2005), Kluwer, Boston
71. Zhu E. Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instructional Science 34 (2006) 451-480