To elicit or to tell: Does it matter

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 200, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 197-204

  Chi, Min ^a   Jordan, Pamela ^a   Vanlehn, Kurt ^b   Litman, Diane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b Arizona State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Intelligent tutoring systems; Knowledge component; Natural language tutoring systems; Pedagogical tutorial tactics; Reinforcement learning

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; TEACHING;

INTELLIGENT TUTORING; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; INTERACTIVITY; KNOWLEDGE COMPONENTS; NATURAL LANGUAGE TUTORING SYSTEM; NATURAL LANGUAGES; PEDAGOGICAL TUTORIAL TACTIC; REINFORCEMENT LEARNINGS; TUTORING SYSTEM;

REINFORCEMENT LEARNING;

EID: 73149125369     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-028-5-197     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Cen, H., Koedinger, K. R., & Junker, B. (2006). Learning Factors Analysis: A general method for cognitive model evaluation and improvement. In M. Ikeda, K. D. Ashley, T.-W. Chan (Eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on ITS, 164-175. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
2. Chi, M.T.H., Siler, S.A. & Jeong, H. (2004). Can tutors monitor students' understanding accurately? Cognition and Instruction, 22(3): 363-387.
3. Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T.,&Hausmann, R. G. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471-533.
4. Chi, M & VanLehn, K. (2008). Eliminating the Gap between the High and Low Students through Meta-Cognitive Strategy Instruction. 9th International Conference, ITS2008, pp 603-613.
5. Chi, M, Jordon, P, VanLehn, K, & Litman, D (in progress) Applying Reinforcement Learning To Induce Effective Pedagogical Knowledge-Components Based Tutorial Tactics
6. Katz, S., Connelly, J., & Allbritton, D. (2003). Going beyond the problem given: How human tutors use post-solution discussions to support transfer. JAIED, 13, 79-116.
7. Moore, J.D, Porayska-Pomsta, K, Varges, S, Zinn, C (2004): Generating Tutorial Feedback with Affect. FLAIRS Conference.
8. Singh, S., Kearns, M. S., Litman, D. J., & Walker, M. A. (1999). Reinforcement learning for spoken dialogue systems. In Proc. NIPS 99.
9. Sutton, R. S. and Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction.A Bradford Book. The MIT Press.
10. Tetreault, J., and Litman D (2008). A Reinforcement Learning Approach to Evaluating State Representations in Spoken Dialogue Systems. Speech Communication Volume50 , Issue 8-9 Pages 683-696
11. VanLehn, K., Graesser, A. C., Jackson, G. T., Jordan, P., Olney, A., & Rose, C. P. (2007). When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cognitive Science 31(1), 3-62.
12. VanLehn, K., Jordan, P., Litma, D., (2007). Developing pedagogically effective tutorial dialogue tactics: Experiments and a testbed. In proceedings of SLaTE Workshop.
13. VanLehn, K. (submitted). The interaction plateau: Less interactive tutoring is often just as effective as human tutoring.