The rad52-Y66A allele alters the choice of donor template during spontaneous chromosomal recombination

DNA Repair

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 23-32

  de Mayolo, Adriana Antúnez ^a   Sunjevaric, Ivana ^a   Reid, Robert ^a   Mortensen, Uffe H ^b   Rothstein, Rodney ^a   Lisby, Michael ^c  

^a NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Homologous recombination

Indexed keywords

RAD52 PROTEIN;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA TEMPLATE; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS MUTANT; GENE DELETION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MITOTIC RECOMBINATION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLASMID; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SISTER CHROMATID; WILD TYPE;

ALLELES; CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA, FUNGAL; ENDODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; MUTATION; RAD52 DNA REPAIR AND RECOMBINATION PROTEIN; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TEMPLATES, GENETIC;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 72949096778     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Lettier G., Feng Q., de Mayolo A.A., Erdeniz N., Reid R.J., Lisby M., Mortensen U.H., and Rothstein R. The role of DNA double-strand breaks in spontaneous homologous recombination in S. cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 2 (2006) e194
2. Fabre F., Chan A., Heyer W.D., and Gangloff S. Alternate pathways involving Sgs1/Top3, Mus81/Mms4, and Srs2 prevent formation of toxic recombination intermediates from single-stranded gaps created by DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 10 (2002) 10
3. Game J.C., and Cox B.S. Allelism tests of mutants affecting sensitivity to radiation in yeast and a proposed nomenclature. Mutat. Res. 6 (1971) 37-55
4. Paques F., and Haber J.E. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63 (1999) 349-404
5. Symington L.S. Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66 (2002) 630-670
6. Lisby M., Barlow J.H., Burgess R.C., and Rothstein R. Choreography of the DNA damage response; spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118 (2004) 699-713
7. Johzuka K., and Ogawa H. Interaction of Mre11 and Rad50: two proteins required for DNA repair and meiosis-specific double-strand break formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 139 (1995) 1521-1532
8. Tsubouchi H., and Ogawa H. A novel mre11 mutation impairs processing of double-strand breaks of DNA during both mitosis and meiosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18 (1998) 260-268
9. Sugawara N., and Haber J.E. Characterization of double-strand break-induced recombination: homology requirements and single-stranded DNA formation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12 (1992) 563-575
10. Ivanov E.L., Sugawara N., White C.I., Fabre F., and Haber J.E. Mutations in XRS2 and RAD50 delay but do not prevent mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14 (1994) 3414-3425
11. Strom L., Lindroos H.B., Shirahige K., and Sjogren C. Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair. Mol. Cell 16 (2004) 1003-1015
12. Unal E., Heidinger-Pauli J.M., and Koshland D. DNA double-strand breaks trigger genome-wide sister-chromatid cohesion through Eco1 (Ctf7). Science 317 (2007) 245-248
13. Unal E., Arbel-Eden A., Sattler U., Shroff R., Lichten M., Haber J.E., and Koshland D. DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. Mol. Cell 16 (2004) 991-1002
14. Kim S.T., Xu B., and Kastan M.B. Involvement of the cohesin protein, Smc1, in Atm-dependent and independent responses to DNA damage. Genes Dev. 16 (2002) 560-570
15. Schiestl R.H., Zhu J., and Petes T.D. Effect of mutations in genes affecting homologous recombination on restriction enzyme-mediated and illegitimate recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14 (1994) 4493-4500
16. Ajimura M., Leem S.H., and Ogawa H. Identification of new genes required for meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 133 (1993) 51-66
17. Ivanov E.L., Korolev V.G., and Fabre F. XRS2, a DNA repair gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is needed for meiotic recombination. Genetics 132 (1992) 651-664
18. Malone R.E., Ward T., Lin S., and Waring J. The RAD50 gene, a member of the double strand break repair epistasis group, is not required for spontaneous mitotic recombination in yeast. Curr. Genet. 18 (1990) 111-116
19. Ray A., Siddiqi I., Kolodkin A.L., and Stahl F.W. Intra-chromosomal gene conversion induced by a DNA double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Mol. Biol. 201 (1988) 247-260
20. Nickoloff J.A., Singer J.D., Hoekstra M.F., and Heffron F. Double-strand breaks stimulate alternative mechanisms of recombination repair. J. Mol. Biol. 207 (1989) 527-541
21. Sweetser D.B., Hough H., Whelden J.F., Arbuckle M., and Nickoloff J.A. Fine-resolution mapping of spontaneous and double-strand break-induced gene conversion tracts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals reversible mitotic conversion polarity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14 (1994) 3863-3875
22. Borts R.H., and Haber J.E. Meiotic recombination in yeast: alteration by multiple heterozygosities. Science 237 (1987) 1459-1465
23. Borts R.H., and Haber J.E. Length and distribution of meiotic gene conversion tracts and crossovers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 123 (1989) 69-80
24. Willis K.K., and Klein H.L. Intrachromosomal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: reciprocal exchange in an inverted repeat and associated gene conversion. Genetics 117 (1987) 633-643
25. Aguilera A., and Klein H.L. Yeast intrachromosomal recombination: long gene conversion tracts are preferentially associated with reciprocal exchange and require the RAD1 and RAD3 gene products. Genetics 123 (1989) 683-694
26. Judd S.R., and Petes T.D. Physical lengths of meiotic and mitotic gene conversion tracts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 118 (1988) 401-410
27. Petes T.D., Malone R.E., and Symington L.S. Recombination in yeast. In: Broach J.R., Pringle J.R., and Jones E.W. (Eds). The Molecular & Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces: Genome Dynamics, Protein Synthesis and Energetics (1991), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor 407-521
28. Alani E., Reenan R.A., and Kolodner R.D. Interaction between mismatch repair and genetic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 137 (1994) 19-39
29. White C.I., and Haber J.E. Intermediates of recombination during mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 9 (1990) 663-673
30. Haber J.E., Ray B.L., Kolb J.M., and White C.I. Rapid kinetics of mismatch repair of heteroduplex DNA that is formed during recombination in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90 (1993) 3363-3367
31. Ray B.L., White C.I., and Haber J.E. Heteroduplex formation and mismatch repair of the "stuck" mutation during mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11 (1991) 5372-5380
32. Cross S.H., Allshire R.C., McKay S.J., McGill N.I., and Cooke H.J. Cloning of human telomeres by complementation in yeast. Nature 338 (1989) 771-774
33. Weng Y.S., and Nickoloff J.A. Evidence for independent mismatch repair processing on opposite sides of a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 148 (1998) 59-70
34. Alvaro D., Lisby M., and Rothstein R. Genome-wide analysis of Rad52 foci reveals diverse mechanisms impacting recombination. PLoS Genet. 3 (2007) 2439-2449
35. Mortensen U.H., Erdeniz N., Feng Q., and Rothstein R. A molecular genetic dissection of the evolutionarily conserved N terminus of yeast Rad52. Genetics 161 (2002) 549-562
36. Sherman F., Fink G.R., and Hicks J.B. Methods in Yeast Genetics (1986), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
37. Zhao X., Muller E.G., and Rothstein R. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol. Cell 2 (1998) 329-340
38. Thomas B.J., and Rothstein R. Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA. Cell 56 (1989) 619-630
39. Erdeniz N., and Rothstein R. Rsp5, a ubiquitin-protein ligase, is involved in degradation of the single-stranded-DNA binding protein rfa1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20 (2000) 224-232
40. Winzeler E.A., Shoemaker D.D., Astromoff A., Liang H., Anderson K., Andre B., Bangham R., Benito R., Boeke J.D., Bussey H., et al. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285 (1999) 901-906
41. Alvaro D., Sunjevaric I., Reid R.J., Lisby M., Stillman D.J., and Rothstein R. Systematic hybrid LOH: a new method to reduce false positives and negatives during screening of yeast gene deletion libraries. Yeast 23 (2006) 1097-1106
42. Reid R., Lisby M., and Rothstein R. Cloning-free genome alterations in Saccharomyce cerevisiae using adaptamer-mediated PCR. Methods Enzymol. 350 (2002) 258-277
43. Cross F.R. 'Marker swap' plasmids: convenient tools for budding yeast molecular genetics. Yeast 13 (1997) 647-653
44. Sikorski R.S., and Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122 (1989) 19-27
45. Rattray A.J., and Symington L.S. Use of a chromosomal inverted repeat to demonstrate that the RAD51 and RAD52 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae have different roles in mitotic recombination. Genetics 138 (1994) 587-595
46. Smith J., and Rothstein R. A mutation in the gene encoding the Saccharomyces cerevisiae single-stranded DNA-binding protein Rfa1 stimulates a RAD52-independent pathway for direct-repeat recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15 (1995) 1632-1641
47. Lea D.E., and Coulson C.A. The distribution in the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations. J. Genet. 49 (1949) 264-285
48. Lisby M., Rothstein R., and Mortensen U.H. Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98 (2001) 8276-8282
49. Kadyk L.C., and Hartwell L.H. Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 132 (1992) 387-402
50. Bai Y., Davis A.P., and Symington L.S. A novel allele of RAD52 that causes severe DNA repair and recombination deficiencies only in the absence of RAD51 or RAD59. Genetics 153 (1999) 1117-1130
51. Kouprina N., Kroll E., Bannikov V., Bliskovsky V., Gizatullin R., Kirillov A., Shestopalov B., Zakharyev V., Hieter P., Spencer F., et al. CTF4 (CHL15) mutants exhibit defective DNA metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 12 (1992) 5736-5747. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12 (1992) 5736-5747 (published erratum appears in Mol. Cell. Biol. 13 (1993) 7202)
52. Selva E.M., Maderazo A.B., and Lahue R.S. Differential effects of the mismatch repair genes MSH2 and MSH3 on homeologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 257 (1997) 71-82
53. Selva E.M., New L., Crouse G.F., and Lahue R.S. Mismatch correction acts as a barrier to homeologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 139 (1995) 1175-1188
54. Chambers S.R., Hunter N., Louis E.J., and Borts R.H. The mismatch repair system reduces meiotic homeologous recombination and stimulates recombination-dependent chromosome loss. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16 (1996) 6110-6120
55. Kouprina N., Pashina O.B., Nikolaishwili N.T., Tsouladze A.M., and Larionov V.L. Genetic control of chromosome stability in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 4 (1988) 257-269
56. Hanna J.S., Kroll E.S., Lundblad V., and Spencer F.A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTF18 and CTF4 are required for sister chromatid cohesion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21 (2001) 3144-3158
57. Spencer F., Gerring S.L., Connelly C., and Hieter P. Mitotic chromosome transmission fidelity mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 124 (1990) 237-249
58. Miles J., and Formosa T. Protein affinity chromatography with purified yeast DNA polymerase alpha detects proteins that bind to DNA polymerase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89 (1992) 1276-1280
59. Uhlmann F., and Nasmyth K. Cohesion between sister chromatids must be established during DNA replication. Curr. Biol. 8 (1998) 1095-1101
60. Blat Y., and Kleckner N. Cohesins bind to preferential sites along yeast chromosome III, with differential regulation along arms versus the centric region. Cell 98 (1999) 249-259
61. Tanaka T., Cosma M.P., Wirth K., and Nasmyth K. Identification of cohesin association sites at centromeres and along chromosome arms. Cell 98 (1999) 847-858
62. Laloraya S., Guacci V., and Koshland D. Chromosomal addresses of the cohesin component Mcd1p. J. Cell Biol. 151 (2000) 1047-1056
63. Krogh B.O., Llorente B., Lam A., and Symington L.S. Mutations in Mre11 phosphoesterase motif I that impair Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex stability in addition to nuclease activity. Genetics 171 (2005) 1561-1570
64. Bressan D.A., Baxter B.K., and Petrini J.H. The Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 protein complex facilitates homologous recombination-based double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19 (1999) 7681-7687
65. Gonzalez-Barrera S., Cortes-Ledesma F., Wellinger R.E., and Aguilera A. Equal sister chromatid exchange is a major mechanism of double-strand break repair in yeast. Mol. Cell 11 (2003) 1661-1671
66. Reynolds A.E., McCarroll R.M., Newlon C.S., and Fangman W.L. Time of replication of ARS elements along yeast chromosome III. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9 (1989) 4488-4494
67. Brewer B.J., and Fangman W.L. Initiation at closely spaced replication origins in a yeast chromosome. Science 262 (1993) 1728-1731
68. Ferguson B.M., Brewer B.J., Reynolds A.E., and Fangman W.L. A yeast origin of replication is activated late in S phase. Cell 65 (1991) 507-515
69. Friedman K.L., Diller J.D., Ferguson B.M., Nyland S.V., Brewer B.J., and Fangman W.L. Multiple determinants controlling activation of yeast replication origins late in S phase. Genes Dev. 10 (1996) 1595-1607
70. Stoler S., Rogers K., Weitze S., Morey L., Fitzgerald-Hayes M., and Baker R.E. Scm3, an essential Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromere protein required for G2/M progression and Cse4 localization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 (2007) 10571-10576
71. Kagawa W., Kurumizaka H., Ishitani R., Fukai S., Nureki O., Shibata T., and Yokoyama S. Crystal structure of the homologous-pairing domain from the human Rad52 recombinase in the undecameric form. Mol. Cell 10 (2002) 359-371
72. Singleton M.R., Wentzell L.M., Liu Y., West S.C., Wigley D.B., Kagawa W., Kurumizaka H., Ishitani R., Fukai S., Nureki O., et al. Structure of the single-strand annealing domain of human RAD52 protein crystal structure of the homologous-pairing domain from the human Rad52 recombinase in the undecameric form. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 (2002) 13492-13497
73. Nimonkar A.V., Sica R.A., and Kowalczykowski S.C. Rad52 promotes second-end DNA capture in double-stranded break repair to form complement-stabilized joint molecules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (2009) 3077-3082
74. McIlwraith M.J., and West S.C. DNA repair synthesis facilitates RAD52-mediated second-end capture during DSB repair. Mol. Cell 29 (2008) 510-516