The art of gate-crashing bringing HRI into users homes

Interaction Studies

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 274-297

  Hüttenrauch, Helge ^a   Topp, Elin A ^b   Eklundh, Kerstin Severinson ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b LUND INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

COGNIRON; Domestic service robotics; Human augmented mapping (HAM); Human robot interaction (HRI); Robot field trial; Spatial management; Spatial prompting

Indexed keywords

EID: 72649095578     PISSN: 15720373     EISSN: 15720381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/is.10.3.02hut     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Brush, A., Palen, L., Swan, L., & Taylor, A. (2005). Designs for home life. In CHI 05: CHI 05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 34 2035-2036. ACM.
2. Chatila, R. (2004). The cognitive robot companion and the european beyond robotics initiative. In 6th International Symposium "Living with Robots".
3. Coradeschi, S. & Saffotti, A. (2006). Symbiotic robotic systems: humans, robots, and smart environments. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(3):82-84.
4. Crabtree, A. (2004). Design in the absence of practice: breaching experiments. In DIS 04: Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems, pages 59-68. ACM.
5. Forlizzi, J. & DiSalvo, C. (2006). Service robots in the domestic environment: A study of the roomba vacuum in the home. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ), Salt Lake City, UT, USA, pages 258-265.
6. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies of the routine gounds of everyday activities. Studies in Ethnomethodology, pages 35-75.
7. Green, A. (2009). Designing and Evaluating Human-Robot Communicationon: Informing Design through Analysis of User Interaction. Doctoral Thesis, KTH School of Computer Science and Communication (CSC), Stockholm, Sweden.
8. Green, A. & Hüttenrauch, H. (2006). Making a case for spatial prompting in human-robot communication. In Multimodal Corpora: From Multimodal Behaviour theories to usable models, workshop at the Fifth international conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC2006), Genova, Italy.
9. Green, A., Hüttenrauch, H., & Severinson Eklundh, K. (2004). Applying the wizard-of-oz framework to cooperative service discovery and configuration. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Ro-Man), Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
10. Green, A., Hüttenrauch, H., Topp, E., & Severinson Eklundh, K. (2006). Developing a contextualized multimodal corpus for human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC2006), Genova, Italy.
11. Hägele, M. & Christensen, H. (2003). Service Robots. United Nations Publishing.
12. Hayashi, K., Sakamoto, D., Kanda, T., Shiomi, M., Koizumi, S., Ishiguro, H., Ogasawara, T., & Hagita, H. (2007). Humanoid robots as a passive-social medium: a field experiment at a train station. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction (HRI), pages 137-144.
13. Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., Bederson, B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Conversy, S., Evans, H., Hansen, H., Roussel, N., & Eiderbäck, B. (2003). Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In CHI 03: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 17-24. ACM.
14. Hüttenrauch, H., Green, A., & Severinson Eklundh, K. (2006a). Investigating spatial relationships in human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Beijing, China.
15. Hüttenrauch, H., Severinson Eklundh, K., Green, A., Topp, E., & Christensen, H. (2006b). Whats in the gap? interaction transitions that make hri work. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Robots and Human Interactive Communications (Ro-Man), Hatfield, UK.
16. Jones, J. (2006). Robots at the tipping point: the road to irobot roomba. Robotics and Automation Magazine, IEEE, 13(1):76-78.
17. Kanda, T., Hirano, T., & Eaton, D. (2004). Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human-Computer Interaction, 19:61-84.
18. Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction, chapter Spatial organization in social encounters: The F-formation system, pages 209-237. Cambridge University Press.
19. Kientz, J., Patel, S., Jones, B., Price, E., Mynatt, E., & Abowd, G. (2008). The georgia tech aware home. In CHI 08: CHI 08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 3675-3680, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
20. Mahani, M.N. (2006). Towards resolving ambiguities in service robots behaviour. Masters thesis, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences (Stockholms University and Royal Institute of Technology), KTH School of Information and Communication Technology, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.
21. Monk, A., Brant, J., Wright, P., & Robinson, J. (2004). Cuhtec: the centre for usable home technology. In CHI 04: CHI 04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1073-1074, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
22. Mutlu, B. & Forlizzi, J. (2008). Robots in organizations: the role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 287-294.
23. Nourbakhsh, I., Kunz, C., & Willeke, T. (2003). The mobot museum robot installations: a five year experiment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)), volume 4, pages 3636-3641.
24. Otero, N., Alissandrakis, A., Dautenhahn, K., Nehaniv, C., Syrdal, D., & Koay, K. (2008). Human to robot demonstrations of routine home tasks: exploring the role of the robots feedback. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction, pages 177-184. ACM.
25. Powers, A. (2008). Feature: What robotics can learn from hci. Interactions Journal, 15:57-69.
26. RoboCup@Home (2008). Robocup@home "rulebook". http://www.robocupathome.org, retrieved September 14, 2008.
27. Saunders, J., Otero, N., & Nehaniv, C. (2007). Issues in human/robot task structuring and teaching. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human interactive Communication (Ro-Man), pages 708-713.
28. Shibata, T., Wada, K., & Tanie, K. (2004). Tabulation and analysis of questionnaire results of subjective evaluation of seal robot in japan, u.k., sweden and italy. In Proeceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).
29. Shiomi, M., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N. (2006). Interactive humanoid robots for a science museum. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Salt Lake City, UT, USA, pages 305-312.
30. Siegwart, R., Arras, K., Bouabdallah, S., Burnier, D., Froidevaux, G., Greppin, X., Jensen, B., Lorotte, A., Mayor, L., Meisser, M., Philippsen, R., Piguet, R., Ramel, G., Terrien, G., & Tomatis, N. (2003). Robox at expo.02: A large-scale installation of personal robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42:203-222.
31. Siino, R. & Hinds, P. (2005). Robots, gender & sensemaking: Sex segregations impact on workers making sense of a mobile autonomous robot. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.
32. Smith, S. (1994). The essential qualities of a home. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14:31-46.
33. Spexard, T., Li, S., Wrede, B., Hanheide, M., Topp, E., & Hüttenrauch, H. (2007). Interaction awareness for joint environment exploration. In Proceedings of the Special Session on Situation Awareness in Social Robots at the IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Ro-Man), Jeju Island, Korea.
34. Sung, J.-Y., Grinter, R., Christensen, H., & Guo, L. (2008). Housewives or technophiles?: understanding domestic robot owners. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction, pages 129-136. ACM.
35. Swan, L., Taylor, A., & Harper, R. (2008). Making place for clutter and other ideas of home. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 15(2):1-24.
36. Swedish Institute of Assistive Technology (Hjälpmedelsinstitutet). http://www.hi.se/en/Swedish-Institute-of-Assistive-Technology-/Smartlab/
37. Thrun, S., Beetz, M., Bennewitz, M., Burgard, W., Cremers, A., Dellaert, F., Fox, D., Hähnel, D., Rosenberg, C., Roy, N., Schulte, J., & Schulz, D. (2000). Probabilistic algorithms and the interactive museum tour-guide robot minerva. International Journal of Robotics Research, 19(11):972-999.
38. Topp, E. (2008). Human-Robot Interaction and Mapping with a Service Robot: Human Augmented Mapping. Doctoral Thesis, KTH School of Computer Science and Communication (CSC), Stockholm, Sweden.
39. Topp, E., Hüttenrauch, H., Christensen, H., & Severinson Eklundh, K. (2006). Bringing together human and robotic environment representations - a pilot study. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference of Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Beijing, China.