Does patient-prosthesis mismatch influence the results of combined aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass grafting?

Kardiologia Polska

Volumn 67, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 865-873

  Mrówczyński, Wojciech ^a   Lutter, Georg ^b   Attmann, Tim ^c   Hoffmann, Grischa ^b   Quaden, Rene ^b   Cremer, Jochen ^b   Böning, Andreas ^c  

^a POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aortic valve replacement; Co morbidity obesity; Coronary artery bypass grafts; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; COMORBIDITY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DYSLIPIDEMIA; FEMALE; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART INFARCTION; HEART VENTRICLE ARRHYTHMIA; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; KIDNEY FAILURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATION; OBESITY; PATIENT PROSTHESIS MISMATCH; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STROKE; WOUND DEHISCENCE; WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 72449121367     PISSN: 00229032     EISSN: 00229032     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Howell NJ, Keogh BE, Barnet V, et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch does not affect survival following aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30: 10-14 (Pubitemid 43850318)
2. Walther T, Rastan A, Falk V, et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch affects short- and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30: 15-29. (Pubitemid 44183638)
3. Mohty D, Malouf JF, Girard SE, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Circulation 2006; 113: 420-426
4. Fuster RG, Montero Argudo JA, Albarova OG, et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement: really tolerable? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 27: 441-449 (Pubitemid 40312352)
5. Milano AD, De Carlo M, Mecozzi G, et al. Clinical outcome in patients with 19-mm and 21-mm St. Jude aortic prostheses: comparison at long-term follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 37-43. (Pubitemid 34084531)
6. Blackstone EH, Cosgrove DM, Jamieson WR, et al. Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126: 783-796
7. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 1131-1141 (Pubitemid 30760574)
8. Castro LJ, Arcidi JM Jr, Fisher AL, et al. Routine enlargement of the small aortic root: a preventive strategy to minimize mismatch. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: 31-36
9. Sawant D, Singh AK, Feng WC, et al. Nineteen-millimeter aortic St. Jude Medical heart valve prosthesis: up to sixteen years' follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: 964-970 (Pubitemid 27191645)
10. Freed DH, Tam JW, Moon MC, et al. Nineteen-millimeter prosthetic aortic valves allow normalization of left ventricular mass in elderly women. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: 2022-2025
11. Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2003; 108: 983-988 (Pubitemid 37048229)
12. Hanayama N, Fazel S, Goldman BS, et al. Contemporary trends in aortic valve surgery: a single centre 10-year clinical experience. J Card Surg 2004; 19: 552-558 (Pubitemid 39587419)
13. Hanayama N, Christakis GT, Mallidi HR, et al. Patient prosthesis prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevant. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 1822-1829 (Pubitemid 34596724)
14. Medalion B, Blackstone EH, Lytle BW, et al. Aortic valve replacement: is valve size important? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 119: 963-974 (Pubitemid 30327416)
15. Moon MR, Pasque MK, Munfakh NA, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement: impact of age and body size on late survival. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81: 481-488
16. Gummert JF, Funkat A, Krian A. Cardiac surgery in Germany during 2004: a report on behalf of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 53: 391-399
17. Ruel M, Rubens FD, Masters RG, et al. Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127: 149-159 (Pubitemid 38160478)
18. Tasca G, Mhagna Z, Perotti S, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on cardiac events and midterm mortality after aortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis. Circulation 2006; 113: 570-576 (Pubitemid 43754358)
19. Rao V, Jamieson WRE, Ivanov J, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2000; 102 (Suppl. 3): 5-9.
20. Seitelberger R, Bialy J, Gottardi R, et al. Relation between size of prosthesis and valve gradient: comparison of two aortic bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 25: 358-363 (Pubitemid 38340570)
21. Brandt M, Harder K, Walluscheck KP, et al. Severe obesity does not adversely affect perioperative mortality and morbidity in coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 19: 662-666 (Pubitemid 32416617)
22. Svedjeholm R, Hakanson E, Szabo Z, et al. Neurological injury after surgery for ischemic heart disease: risk factors, outcome and role of metabolic interventions. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 19: 611-618 (Pubitemid 32416613)
23. Rahimtoola SH. Choice of prosthetic heart valve for adult patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 893-904. (Pubitemid 36315528)
24. Kvidal P, Bergström R, Hörte LG, et al. Observed and relative survival after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 747-756 (Pubitemid 30167033)
25. Koch CG, Khandwala F, Estafanous FG, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient size on functional recovery after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2005; 111: 3221-3229 (Pubitemid 40874993)