Partitioning and mapping uncertainties in ensembles of forecasts of species turnover under climate change

Ecography

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 897-906

  Diniz Filho, José Alexandre F ^a   Mauricio Bini, Luis ^a   Fernando Rangel, Thiago ^b   Loyola, Rafael D ^a   Hof, Christian ^c   Nogués Bravo, David ^c   Araújo, Miguel B ^d,e  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c MUSEO NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS NATURALES   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ÉVORA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIRD; CLIMATE CHANGE; GENERAL CIRCULATION MODEL; HOME RANGE; NICHE PARTITIONING; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; SPECIES RICHNESS; TURNOVER;

AVES;

EID: 72049091777     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06196.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Allouche, O. et al. 2006. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS) J. Appl. Ecol. 43 : 1223 1232.
2. Anderson, B. J. et al. 2009. Dynamics of range margins for metapopulations under climate change Proc. R. Soc. B 276 : 1415 1420.
3. Araújo, M. B. Guisan, A. 2006. Five or so challenges for species distribution modelling J. Biogeogr. 33 : 1677 1688.
4. Araújo, M. B. Rahbek, C. 2006. How does climate change affect biodiversity? Science 313 : 1396 1397.
5. Araújo, M. B. Luoto, M. 2007. The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 16 : 743 753.
6. Araújo, M. B. New, M. 2007. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions Trends Ecol. Evol. 22 : 42 47.
7. Araújo, M. B. et al. 2005a. Reducing uncertainty in projections of extinction risk from climate change Global. Ecol. Biogeogr. 14 : 529 538.
8. Araújo, M. B. et al. 2005b. Validation of species-climate impact models under climate change Global. Change. Biol. 11 : 1504 1513.
9. Araújo, M. B. et al. 2006. Climate warming and the decline of amphibians and reptiles in Europe J. Biogeogr. 33 : 1712 1728.
10. Araújo, M. B. et al. 2008. Quaternary climate changes explain diversity among reptiles and amphibians Ecography 31 : 8 15.
11. Beaumont, L. J. et al. 2007. Where will species go? Incorporating new advances in climate modeling into projections of species distributions Global Change Biol. 13 : 1368 1385.
12. Berthelot, M. et al. 2005. How uncertainties in future climate change predictions translate into future terrestrial carbon flux Global Change Biol. 11 : 959 970.
13. Breiman, L. 2001. Random forest Mach. Learn. 45 : 5 32.
14. Brook, B. et al. 2009. Integrating bioclimate with population models to improve forecasts of species extinctions under climate change Biol. Lett. in press, doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0480.
15. Brotons, L. et al. 2004. Presence-absence vs presence-only modelling methods for predicting bird habitat suitability Ecography 27 : 165 172.
16. Buisson, L. et al. 2009. Uncertainty in ensemble forecasting of species distribution Global Change, Biol. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02000.x.
17. Busby, J. R. 1991. BIOCLIM: a bioclimate analysis and prediction system Margules, C. R. Austin, M. P. Nature conservation: cost effective biological surveys and data analysis. CSIRO 64 68.
18. De Marco, P. et al. 2008. Spatial analysis improves species distribution modelling during range expansion Biol. Lett. 4 : 577 580.
19. Dormann, C. F. 2007. Promising the future? Global change projections of species distributions Basic Appl. Ecol. 8 : 387 397.
20. Dormann, C. F. et al. 2008. Components of uncertainty on species distribution analysis: a case study of the great grey shrike Ecology 89 : 3371 3386.
21. Elith, J. Graham, C. H. 2009. Do they? How do they? Why do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models Ecography 32 : 66 77.
22. Elith, J. et al. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data Ecography 29 : 129 151.
23. Farber, O. Kadmon, R. 2003. Assessment of alternative approaches for bioclimatic modeling with special emphasis on the Mahalanobis distance Ecol. Model. 160 : 115 130.
24. Fielding, A. H. Bell, J. F. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models Environ. Conserv. 24 : 38 49.
25. Fitzpatrick, M. C. et al. 2008. Data set matter, but so do evolution and ecology Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 17 : 562 565.
26. Guisan, A. Thuiller, W. 2005. Predicting species distributions: offering more than simple habitat models Ecol. Lett. 8 : 993 1009.
27. Hawkins, B. A. et al. 2003. Productivity and history as predictors of the latitudinal diversity gradient of terrestrial birds Ecology 84 : 1608 1623.
28. Hawkins, B. A. et al. 2008. What do range maps and surveys tell us about diversity patterns? Folia Geobot. 43 : 345 355.
29. Heikkinen, R. K. et al. 2006. Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modeling under climate change Progr. Phys. Geogr. 30 : 751 777.
30. IPCC. 2000. Emissions scenarios. Cambridge Univ. Press.
31. Jiménez-Valverde, A. et al. 2008. Not as good as they seem: the importance of concepts in species distribution modeling Divers. Distrib. 14 : 885 890.
32. Lawler, J. J. et al. 2006. Predicting climate-induced range shifts: model differences and model reliability Global Change Biol. 12 : 1568 1584.
33. Lawler, J. J. et al. 2009. Projected climate-induced faunal change in the western Hemisphere Ecology 90 : 588 597.
34. Legendre, P. Legendre, L. 1998. Numerical ecology, 3rd ed. Elsevier.
35. Leutbecher, M. Palmer, T. N. 2008. Ensemble forecasting J. Comput. Phys. 227 : 3515 3539.
36. Liu, C. et al. 2005. Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions Ecography 28 : 385 393.
37. Lobo, J. M. et al. 2008. AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 17 : 145 151.
38. Manel, S. et al. 1999. Comparing discriminant analysis, neural networks and logistic regression for predicting species distribution: a case study with a Himalayan river bird Ecol. Model. 120 : 337 347.
39. Marmion, M. et al. 2009. Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modeling Divers. Distrib. 15 : 59 69.
40. McCullagh, P. Nelder, J. A. 1989. Generalized linear models, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
41. Meehl, G. A. et al. 2007. The WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset: a new era in climate change research Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 88 : 1383 1394.
42. Meynard, C. N. Quinn, J. F. 2007. Predicting species distributions: a critical comparison of the most common statistical models using artificial species J. Biogeogr. 34 : 1455 1469.
43. O'Hanley, J. R. 2009. NeuralEnsembles: a neural network based ensemble forecasting program for habitat and bioclimatic suitability analysis Ecography 32 : 89 93.
44. Pearman, P. B. et al. 2008. Niche dynamics in space and time Trends Ecol. Evol. 23 : 149 158.
45. Pearson, R. G. Dawson, T. P. 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelopes useful? Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 12 : 361 371.
46. Pearson, R. G. et al. 2006. Model-based uncertainty in species range prediction J. Biogeogr. 33 : 1704 1711.
47. Pearson, R. G. et al. 2007. Predicting species distributions from small number of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar J. Biogeogr. 34 : 102 117.
48. Peterson, A. T. Nakazawa, Y. 2008. Environmental data sets matter in ecological niche modelling: an example with Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri Global. Ecol. Biogeogr. 17 : 135 144.
49. Peterson, A. T. et al. 2002. Future projections for Mexican faunas under global climate change scenarios Nature 416 : 626 629.
50. Peterson, A. T. et al. 2007. Transferability and model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: a comparison of GARP and Maxent Ecography 30 : 550 560.
51. Peterson, A. T. et al. 2008. Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis: applications in ecological niche modeling Ecol. Model. 213 : 63 72.
52. Phillips, S. J. 2008. Transferability, sample selection bias and background data in presence-only modelling: a response to Peterson et al. 2007 Ecography 31 : 272 278.
53. Phillips, S. J. Dudík, M. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation Ecography 31 : 161 175.
54. Phillips, S. J. et al. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions Ecol. Model. 190 : 231 259.
55. Randin, C. F. et al. 2006. Are niche-based species distribution models transferable in space? J. Biogeogr. 33 : 1689 1703.
56. Rangel, T. F. L. V. B. et al. 2006. Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macroecology and biogeography Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 15 : 321 431.
57. Rickebusch, S. et al. 2008. Incorporating the effects of changes in vegetation functioning and CO2 on water availability in plant habitat models Biol. Lett. 4 : 556 559.
58. Roura-Pascual, N. et al. 2009. Consensual predictions of potential distributional areas for invasive species: a case study of Argentine ants in the Iberian Peninsula Biol. Inv. 11 : 1017 1031.
59. Segurado, P. Araújo, M. B. 2004. An evaluation of methods for modelling species distributions J. Biogeogr. 31 : 1555 1568.
60. Soberón, J. 2007. Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species Ecol. Lett. 10 : 1115 1123.
61. Sokal, R. R. Rohlf, F. J. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. W. H. Freeman.
62. Stainforth, D. A. et al. 2005. Uncertainty in predictions of the climate responses to rising levels of greenhouse gases Nature 433 : 403 406.
63. Stockwell, D. R. B. Noble, I. R. 1992. Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data: a robust and informative method of data analysis Math. Comput. Simul. 33 : 385 390.
64. Thomas, C. D. et al. 2004a. Extinction risk from climate change Nature 427 : 145 148.
65. Thomas, C. D. et al. 2004b. Biodiversity conservation: uncertainty in predictions of extinction risk/Effects of changes in climate and land use/Climate change and extinction risk (reply) Nature 430 : 1 July 2004, doi:10.1038/nature02719.
66. Thuiller, W. 2003. BIOMOD: optimising predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change Global Change Biol. 9 : 1353 1362.
67. Thuiller, W. 2004. Patterns and uncertainties of species' range shifts under climate change Global Change Biol. 10 : 2020 2027.
68. Thuiller, W. et al. 2004. Biodiversity conservation: uncertainty in predictions of extinction risk Nature 430, 1 July 2004, doi:10.1038/nature02716.
69. Thuiller, W. et al. 2005a. Niche properties and geographical extent as predictors of species sensitivity to climate change Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 14 : 347 357.
70. Thuiller, W. et al. 2005b. Climate change threats plant diversity in Europe Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 102 : 8245 8250.
71. Thuiller, W. et al. 2009. BIOMOD - A platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions Ecography 32 : 369 373.
72. Tsoar, A. et al. 2007. A comparative evaluation of presence only methods for modelling species distribution Divers. Distrib. 13 : 397 405.