Computer-assisted language learning authoring issues

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 93, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2009, Pages 784-801

  Otto, Sue E K ^a   Pusack, James P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71849089607     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00973.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alessi S M, Trollip S R. Multimedia for learning 2001, Boston, Allyn and Bacon
2. Bax S. CALL-past, present and future. System 2003, 31:13-28.
3. Beatty K. Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning 2003, London, Pearson Education
4. Browne C, Gerrity S, Fotos S, Browne C. Setting up and maintaining a CALL laboratory. New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms 2004, 171-197. In, Eds, pp, Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum
5. Chun D M. L2 reading on the Web: Strategies for accessing information in hypermedia. Computer Assisted Language Learning 2001, 14:367-403.
6. Chun D M, Payne J S. What makes students click: Working memory and look-up behavior. System 2004, 32:481-503.
7. Chun D M, Plass J L. Research on text comprehension in multimedia environments. Language Learning & Technology 1997, 1(1):60-81.
8. Egbert J. CALL essentials: Principles and practice in CALL classrooms 2005, Alexandria, VA, Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages
9. Farmer R, Gruba P. Towards model-driven end-user development in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning 2006, 19:149-191.
10. Fotos S, Browne C, Fotos S, Browne C. The development of CALL and current options. New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms 2004, 3-14. In, Eds, pp, Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum
11. Garrett N. Technology in the service of language learning: Trends and issues. Modern Language Journal 1991, 75:74-101.
12. Gimeno A. The INGENIO online CALL authoring shell: New challenges in developing an online CALL authoring shell, content manager and courseware: The INGENIO model. EUROCALL Newsletter 2005, http://www.eurocall-languages.org/news/newsletter/7/index.html#projects, 7, Retrieved June 10, 2009, from
13. Heift T. Multiple learner errors and meaningful feedback: A challenge for iCALL systems. CALICO Journal 2003, 20:533-548.
14. Heift T. Corrective feedback and learner uptake in CALL. ReCALL 2004, 16:416-431.
15. Heift T. Context-sensitive help in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning 2006, 19:243-259.
16. Hubbard P. CALL and the future of language teacher education. CALICO Journal 2008, 25:175-188.
17. Hubbard P, Bradin Siskin C. Another look at tutorial CALL. ReCALL 2004, 16:448-461.
18. Hubbard P, Levy M. Teacher education in CALL 2006, Eds, Philadelphia, Benjamins
19. Iwabuchi T, Fotos S, Fotos S, Browne C. Creating course-specific CD-ROMs for interactive language learning. New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms 2004, 149-167. In, Eds, pp, Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum
20. Kuriscak L M, Luke C L, Lomicka L, Lord G. Language learner attitudes toward virtual worlds: An investigation of Second Life. The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning 2009, 173-198. In, Eds, pp, San Marcos, TX, CALICO
21. Levy M. Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization 1997, Oxford, UK, Clarendon Press
22. Levy M, Stockwell G. CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning 2006, Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum
23. Lomicka L, Lord G. The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning 2009, Eds, San Marcos, TX, CALICO
24. Nagata N. Intelligent computer feedback for second language instruction. Modern Language Journal 1993, 77:330-339.
25. Nagata N. An experimental comparison of deductive and inductive feedback generated by a simple parser. System 1997, 25:515-534.
26. Nagata N. BANZAI: An application of natural language processing to Web-based language learning. CALICO Journal: 19 2002, 583-599.
27. Nagata N, Gascoigne C. Input enhancement by natural language processing. Assessing the impact of input enhancement in second language education: Evaluation in theory: research and practice 2007, 152-168. In, Ed, pp, Stillwater, OK, New Forums Press
28. Nemtchinova E, Lomicka L, Cooke-Plagwitz J. Creating original language teaching materials with presentation software. Teaching with technology 2004, 19-25. In, Eds, pp, Boston, Heinle
29. Pennington M, Fotos S, Browne C. Electronic media in second language writing: An overview of tools and research findings. New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms 2004, 69-92. In, Eds, pp, Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum
30. Smith B, Lafford B A. The evaluation of scholarly activity in computer-assisted language learning. Modern Language Journal 2009, 93(s1):868-883.
31. Sykes J M, Lomicka L, Lord G. Learner requests in Spanish: Examining the potential of multiuser virtual environments for L2 pragmatics acquisition. The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning 2009, 199-234. In, Eds, pp, San Marcos, TX, CALICO
32. Sykes J M, Oskoz A, Thorne S L. Web 2.0, Synthetic immersive environments, and mobile resources for language education. CALICO Journal: 25 2008, 528-546.
33. Thorne S L, Black R W, Sykes J M. Second language use, socialization, and learning in Internet interest communities and online gaming. Modern Language Journal 2009, 93(s1):802-821.