Creating course-specific CD-ROMs for interactive language learning

New Perspectives on CALL for Second Language Classrooms

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 149-167

  Iwabuchi, Takashi ^a   Fotos, Sandra ^a  

^a SENSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69949185732     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410610775     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Ashworth, D. (1996). Hypermedia and CALL. In M. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp. 79-96). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
2. Biber, D., & Reppen, R. (2002). What does frequency have to do with grammar teaching? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 199-208.
3. Boling, E., & Soo, K. S. (1999). CALL issues: Designing CALL software. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice and critical issues (pp. 442-458). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
4. Chapelle, C. (1999). Theory and research: Investigation of "authentic" language tasks. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice and critical issues (pp. 101-115). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
5. Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6. Chapelle, C., Jamieson, J., & Park, Y. (1996). Second language classroom research traditions: How does CALL fit? In M. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp. 33-53). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
7. Chesters, G. (2001). Editorial. ReCALL, 13(2), 145.
8. Chun, D., & Plass, J. (2000). Networked multimedia environments for second language acquisition. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 151-170). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cummins, J. (2002). Learning through target language texts. In K. Nakajima (Ed.), Learning Japanese in the networked society (pp. 105-122). Calgary, Canada: University of Calgary Press.
10. Dunkel, P. (1991). Research on the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction and computer-assisted language learning. In P. Dunkel (Ed.), Computer assisted language learning and testing (pp. 5-36). New York: Newbury House.
11. Egbert, J., Chao, C., & Hanson-Smith, E. (1999). Computer-enhanced learning environments: An overview. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice and critical issues (pp. 1-13). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
12. Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143-188.
13. Fotos, S. (2001a). Structure-based interactive tasks for the EFL grammar learner. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 135-154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Fotos, S., (2001b). Cognitive approaches to grammar instruction. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed., pp. 267-284). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
15. Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2002). Frequency effects and second language acquisition: A complex picture? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 249-260.
16. Heift, T. (2001). Error-specific and individualized feedback in a web-based language tutoring system: Do they read it? ReCALL, 13(1), 99-109.
17. Higgins, J. (1988). Language, learners and computers: Human intelligence and artificial unintelligence. Harlow, England: Longman.
18. Hubbard, P. (1996). Elements of CALL methodology. In M. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp. 15-32). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
19. Kaltenböck, G. (2001). Learner autonomy: A guiding principle in designing a CD-ROM for intonation practice. ReCALL, 13(2), 179-190.
20. Kern, R., & Warschauer, M. (2000). Introduction: Theory and practice of network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 1-19). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Marzio, M. (2000). Getting "real" with video and CD ROM: Real English at the Marzio School. In E. Hanson-Smith (Ed.), Technology-enhanced learning environments (pp. 67-84). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
23. Pujola, J. T. (2001). Did CALL feedback feed back? Researching learners' use of feedback. Re-CALL, 13(1), 79-98.
24. Taylor, R. (Ed). (1980). The computer in the school: Tutor, tool, tutee. New York: Teachers College Press.
25. Tsutsui, M. (2002). Developing CALL software. In K. Nakajima (Ed.), Learning Japanese in the networked society (pp. 25-37). Calgary, Canada: University of Calgary Press.
26. Underwood, J. (1984). Linguistics, computers, and the language teacher: A communicative approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
27. Wachman, R. (1999). Classroom practice: Autonomy through authoring software. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice and critical issues (pp. 403-426). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.