The evaluation of scholarly activity in computer-assisted language learning

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 93, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2009, Pages 868-883

  Smith, Bryan ^a   Lafford, Barbara A ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71849107316     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00978.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Anderson L L, Lord G. Coauthoring: What every department should know. ADFL Bulletin 2008, 39(2 & 3):49-55.
2. Egbert J. Quality analysis of journals in TESOL and applied linguistics. TESOL Quarterly 2007, 41:157-171.
3. System-Elsevier 2009, http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/335/description#description, Elsevier, Retrieved July 13, 2009, from
4. EuroCALL Research Policy Statement: Joint policy statement arising from a seminar on CALL 1999, http://www.eurocall-languages.org/research/research_policy.html, EUROCALL (European Association for Computer-Assisted Language Learning), Retrieved July 13, 2009, from
5. Garrett N. Technology in the service of language learning: Trends and issues. Modern Language Journal 1991, 75:74-101.
6. Katz S, Watzinger-Tharp J. Toward an understanding of the role of applied linguists in foreign language departments. Modern Language Journal 2005, 89:490-502.
7. Magnan S. Commentary: The promise of digital scholarship is SLA research and language pedagogy. Language Learning and Technology 2007, 11(3):152-155.
8. Meho L I, Rodgers Y. Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction research: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008, 59:1711-1726.
9. Guidelines for evaluating work with digital media in the modern languages 2002, http://www.mla.org/resources/documents/rep_it/guidelines_evaluation_digital, MLA (Modern Language Association), Retrieved on July 13, 2009, from
10. Report of the MLA Task Force on Evaluating Scholarship for Tenure and Promotion 2006, http://www.mla.org/pdf/task_force_tenure_promo.pdf, MLA (Modern Language Association), Retrieved on July 13, 2009, from
11. Considerations for evaluation of applied linguistics in language, literature, and culture departments in the UC system 2009, http://uccllt.ucdavis.edu/white-papers/evaluation-white-paper5.15.pdf, UCLLT (University of California Consortium for Language Learning & Teaching), White paper, Retrieved on July 13, 2009, from
12. VanPatten B, Williams J. Research criteria for tenure in second language acquisition: Results from a survey of the field 2002, Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Chicago