Electronic media in second language writing: An overview of tools and research findings

New Perspectives on CALL for Second Language Classrooms

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 69-92

  Pennington, Martha C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BEDFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909069740     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410610775     Document Type: Chapter

References (116)

1. Akyel, A., & Kamisli, S. (1999). Word processing in the EFL classroom: Effects on writing strategies, attitudes, and products. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), Writing in an electronic medium: Research with language learners (pp. 27-60). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
2. Ashworth, D. (1996). Hypermedia and CALL. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), The Power of CALL (pp. 79-95). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
3. Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1993). The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing in writing instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 69-93.
4. Barclay, D. (1995). Ire, envy, irony, and ENFI: Electronic conferences as unreliable narrative. Computers and Composition, 12, 23-44.
5. Barker, T. T., & Kemp, F. O. (1990). Network theory: A postmodern pedagogy for the writing classroom. In C. Handa (Ed.), Computer and community: Teaching composition in the twenty-first century (pp. 1-27). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
6. Baron, N. S. (1998). Letters by phone or speech by other means: The linguistics of e-mail. Language & Communication, 18, 133-170.
7. Baron, N. S. (2000). Alphabet to email: How written English evolved and where it's heading. London: Routledge.
8. Benesch, S. (1987). Word processing in English as a second language: A case study of three non-native college students. Paper presented at the conference on College Composition and Communication, Atlanta, GA. ERIC Document No. ED 281383.
9. Bernhardt, S. A. (1993). The shape of text to come: The texture of print on screens. College Composition and Communication, 44, 151-175.
10. Bernhardt, S. A., Edwards, P. G., & Wojahn, P. R. (1989). Teaching college composition with computers: A program evaluation study. Written Communication, 6, 108-133.
11. Betancourt, F., & Phinney, M. (1988). Sources of writing block in bilingual writers. Written Communication, 5, 461-478.
12. Bisaillon, J. (1999). Effects of the teaching of revision strategies in a computer-based environment. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), Writing in an electronic medium: Research with language learners (pp. 131-157). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
13. Bolton, K. (2000). The sociolinguistics of Hong Kong and the space for Hong Kong English. World Englishes, 19, 265-285.
14. Braine, G. (2001). A study of English as a foreign language (EFL) writers on a local-area network (LAN) and in traditional classes. Computers and Composition, 18, 275-292.
15. Brock, M. N. (1990). Can the computer tutor? An analysis of a disk-based text analyzer. System, 18, 351-359.
16. Brock, M. N. (1993). Three disk-based text analyzers and the ESL writer. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 19-40.
17. Brock, M. N. (1995). Computerized text analysis: Roots and research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8, 227-258.
18. Brock, M. N., & Pennington, M. C. (1999). A comparative study of text analysis and peer tutoring as input to writing on computer in an ESL context. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), Writing in an electronic medium: Research with language learners (pp. 61-94). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
19. Bruce, B., Peyton, J. K., & Batson, T. (Eds.). (1993). Network-based classrooms: Promises and realities. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Bruce, B. C., & Rubin, A. (1993). Electronic quills: A situated evaluation of using computers for writing in classrooms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Chadwick, S., & Bruce, N. (1989). The revision process in academic writing: From pen & paper to word processor. Hongkong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 12(April), 1-27.
22. Cochran-Smith, M. (1991). Word processing and writing in elementary classrooms: A critical review of related literature. Review of Educational Research, 61, 107-155.
23. Cochran-Smith, M., Paris, C. L., & Kahn, J. L. (1991). Learning to write differently: Beginning writers and word processing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
24. Collot, M., & Belmore, N. (1996). Electronic language: A new variety of English. In S. Herring (Ed.), Computer mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 13-28). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
25. Coulmas, F. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
26. Coulthard, M., & Brazil, D. (1992). Exchange structure. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in spoken discourse analysis (pp. 50-78). London: Routledge.
27. Cross, G. (1990). Left to their own devices: Three basic writers using word processing. Computers and Composition, 7(2), 47-58.
28. Daiute, C. (1985). Writing and computers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
29. Dalton, D. W., & Hannafin, M. J. (1987). The effects of word processing on written composition. Journal of Educational Research, 80, 338-342.
30. Dunn, B., & Reay, D. (1989). Word processing and the keyboard: Comparative effects of transcription on achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 237-245.
31. Esling, J. H. (1991). Researching the effects of networking: Evaluating the spoken and written discourse generated by working with CALL. In P. Dunkel (Ed.), Computer-assisted language learning and testing: Research issues and practice (pp. 111-131). New York: Newbury House/HarperCollins.
32. Etchison, C. (1989). Word processing: A helpful tool for basic writers. Computers and Composition, 6(2), 33-43.
33. Greenleaf, C. (1994). Technological indeterminacy: The role of classroom writing practices and pedagogy in shaping student use of the computer. Written Communication, 11, 85-130.
34. Haas, C. (1989). How the writing medium shapes the writing process: Effects of word processing on planning. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 181-207.
35. Harris, J. (1985). Student writers and word processing: A preliminary evaluation. College Composition and Communication, 36, 323-330.
36. Hawisher, G. E. (1987). The effects of word processing on the revision strategies of college freshmen. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 145-160.
37. Hawisher, G. E. (1989). Research and recommendations for computers and composition. In G. E. Hawisher & C. L. Selfe (Eds.), Critical perspectives on computers and composition instruction (pp. 44-69). New York: Teachers College Press.
38. Hawisher, G. E., & Fortune, R. (1989). Word processing and the basic writer. Collegiate Microcomputer, 7, 275-284, 287.
39. Hawisher, G. E., & Selfe, C. L. (2000). Introduction: Testing the claims. In G. E. Hawisher & C. L. Selfe (Eds.), Global literacies and the World-Wide Web (pp. 1-18). London: Routledge.
40. Hill, C. A., Wallace, D. L., & Haas, C. (1991). Revising on-line: Computer technologies and the revising process. Computers and Composition, 9(1), 83-117.
41. Hoffman, R. (1993). The distance brings us closer: Electronic mail, ESL learner writers and teachers. In G. Davies & B. Samways (Eds.), Teleteaching (pp. 391-399). International Federation for Information Processing, University of Trondheim, and the Norwegian Computer Society.
42. Hoffman, R. (1994). The warm network, electronic mail, ESL learners, and the personal touch. On-CALL: The Australian Journal of Computers and Education, 8(2), 10-13.
43. Hoffman, R. (1996). Computer networks: Webs of communication for language teaching. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp. 55-77). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
44. Howard, T. (1992). WANs, connectivity, and computer literacy: An introduction and glossary. Computers and Composition, 9(3), 41-57.
45. Jones, S., & Tetroe, J. (1987). Composing in a second language. In A. Matsuhashi, (Ed.), Writing in real time: Modelling production processes (pp. 34-57). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
46. Kamisli, S. (1992). Word processing and the writing process: A case study of five Turkish English as a second language (ESL) students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.
47. Kaufer, D. S., and Neuwirth, C. (1995). Supporting online team editing: Using technology to shape performance and to monitor individual and group action. Computers and Composition, 12, 113-124.
48. Kozma, R. B. (1991). Computer-based writing tools and the cognitive needs of novice writers. Computers and Composition, 8(2), 31-45.
49. Kress, G. (1998). Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication: The potentials of new forms of text. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 53-79). London and New York: Routledge.
50. Lam, F. S., & Pennington, M. C. (1995). The computer vs. the pen: A comparative study of word processing in a Hong Kong secondary classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 7, 75-92.
51. Li, J., & Cumming, A. (2001). Word processing and ESL writing: A longitudinal case study. In R. Manchon (Ed.), International Journal of English Studies, 1(2), 127-152.
52. Lutz, J. (1987). A study of professional and experienced writers revising and editing at the computer with pen and paper. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 398-421.
53. Mabrito, M. (1991). Electronic mail as a vehicle for peer response. Written Communication, 8, 509-532.
54. Marcoul, I., & Pennington, M. C. (1999). Composing with computer technology: A case study of a group of students in computer studies learning French as a second language. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), Writing in an electronic medium: Research with language learners (pp. 285-315). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
55. Marcus, S. (1993). Multimedia, hypermedia and the teaching of English. In M. Monteith (Ed.), Computers and language (pp. 21-43). Oxford, England: Intellect Books.
56. Markley, P. (1992). Creating independent ESL writers and thinkers: Computer networking for composition. CAELL Journal, 3(2), 6-12.
57. McAllister, C., & Louth, R. (1988). The effect of word processing on the quality of basic writers' revisions. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 417-427.
58. McConaghy, C., & Snyder, I. (2000). In G. E. Hawisher & C. L. Selfe (Eds.), Global literacies and the World-Wide Web (pp. 74-92). London: Routledge.
59. McGarrell, H. M. (1993, August). Perceived and actual impact of computer use in second language writing classes. Paper presented at the Congress of the Association de Linguistique Appliquee (AILA), Frije University, Amsterdam.
60. Moran, C. (1995). Notes toward a rhetoric of e-mail. Computers and Composition, 12, 15-21.
61. Moran, C., & Hawisher, G. E. (1998). The rhetorics and languages of electronic mail. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 80-101). London and New York: Routledge.
62. Nabors, L. K., & Swartley, E. C. (1999). Student email letters: Negotiating meaning, gathering information, building relationships. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), Writing in an electronic medium: Research with language learners (pp. 229-266). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
63. Neu, J., & Scarcella, R. (1991). Word processing in the ESL writing classroom: A survey of student attitudes. In P. Dunkel (Ed.), Computer-assisted language learning and testing: Research issues and practice (pp. 169-187). New York: Newbury House/HarperCollins.
64. Oliver, R., & Kerr, T. (1993). The impact of word processing on the preparation and submission of written essays in a tertiary course of study. Higher Education, 26, 217-226.
65. Owston, R. D., Murphy, S., & Wideman, H. H. (1992). The effects of word processing on students' writing quality and revision strategies. Research in the Teaching of English, 26, 249-276.
66. Palmquist, M. E. (1993). Network-supported interaction in two writing classrooms. Computers and Composition, 10, 25-57.
67. Pennington, M. C. (1991). Positive and negative potentials of word processing for ESL writers. System, 19, 267-275.
68. Pennington, M. C. (1992). Beyond off-the-shelf computer remedies for student writers: Alternatives to canned feedback. System, 20(4), 423-437.
69. Pennington, M. C. (1993a). Curriculum on a shaky foundation: An assessment of the research base supporting computer-assisted text analysis for second language writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 5(3), 167-177.
70. Pennington, M. C. (1993b). A critical examination of word processing effects in relation to L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 227-255.
71. Pennington, M. C. (1993c). Exploring the potential of word processing for non-native writers. Computers and the Humanities, 27(3), 149-163.
72. Pennington, M. C. (1993d). Modeling the student writer's acquisition of word processing skills: The interaction of computer, writing, and language media. Computers and Composition, 10, 59-79.
73. Pennington, M. C. (1996a). The power of the computer in language education. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp. 1-14). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
74. Pennington, M. C. (1996b). The computer and the non-native writer: A natural partnership. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
75. Pennington, M. C. (1996c). Writing the natural way: On computer. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 9, 125-142.
76. Pennington, M. C. (1996d). The way of the computer: Developing writing skill in an electronic environment. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Multimedia language teaching (pp. 93-113). Tokyo: Logos International.
77. Pennington, M. C. (1999a). The missing link in computer-assisted writing. In K. Cameron (Ed.), CALL: Media, design & applications (pp. 271-292). Lisse, Switzerland: Swets & Zeitlinger.
78. Pennington, M. C. (1999b). Word processing and beyond: Writing in an electronic medium. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), Writing in an electronic medium: Research with language learners (pp. 1-26). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
79. Pennington, M. C. (2000a, June). Computers and the human experience. Town and Gown Lecture, University of Luton.
80. Pennington, M. C. (2000b, July). Writing minds and talking fingers: Doing literacy in an electronic age. Plenary address at the CALL for the 21st Century conference cosponsored by IATEFL and ESADE, Barcelona.
81. Pennington, M. C. (2001, March). Changing relationships between context and communication from pre-language to post-language. Invited presentation, University of California at Berkeley, Davis, and Santa Barbara campuses.
82. Pennington, M. C. (2003). The impact of the computer in second language writing. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 287-310). New York: Cambridge University Press.
83. Pennington, M. C., & Brock, M. N. (1992). Process and product approaches to computer-assisted composition. In M. C. Pennington & V. Stevens (Eds.), Computers in applied linguistics: An international perspective (pp. 79-109). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
84. Phinney, M. (1989). Computers, composition, and second language teaching. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), Teaching languages with computers: The state of the art (pp. 81-96). La Jolla, CA: Athelstan.
85. Phinney, M. (1991a). Computer-assisted writing and writing apprehension in ESL students. In P. Dunkel (Ed.), Computer-assisted language learning and testing: Research issues and practice (pp. 189-204). New York: Newbury House/HarperCollins.
86. Phinney, M. (1991b). Word processing and writing apprehension in first and second language writers. Computers and Composition, 9, 65-82.
87. Phinney, M. (1996). Exploring the virtual world: Computers in the second language writing classroom. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp. 137-152). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
88. Phinney, M., & Khouri, S. (1993). Computers, revision, and ESL writers: The role of experience. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 257-277.
89. Phinney, M., & Mathis, C. (1990). ESL student responses to writing with computers. TESOL Newsletter, 24(2), 30-31.
90. Piolat, A. (1991). Effects of word processing on text revision. Language and Education, 5, 255-272.
91. Robinson-Staveley, K., & Cooper, J. (1990). The use of computers for writing: Effects on an English composition class. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6, 41-48.
92. Roblyer, M. D., Castine, W. H., & King, F. J. (1988). Assessing the impact of computer-based instruction: A review of recent research. New York: Haworth.
93. Romano, S., Field, B., & de Huergo, E. W. (2000). Web literacies of the already accessed and technically inclined: Schooling in Monterrey, Mexico. In G. E. Hawisher & C. L. Selfe (Eds.), Global literacies and the World-Wide Web (pp. 189-216). London: Routledge.
94. Rusmin, R. S. (1999). Patterns of adaptation to a new writing environment: The experience of word processing by mature second language writers. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), Writing in an electronic medium: Research with language learners (pp. 183-227). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
95. Sayers, D. (1989). Bilingual sister classes in computer writing networks. In D. M. Johnson & D. H. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp. 120-133). New York: Longman.
96. Schramm, R. M. (1989). The effects of using word-processing equipment in writing instruction: A meta-analysis (Doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 2463A.
97. Sharples, M. (1997, March). The new writing environment: Expanding the notion of writing. Workshop on second language writing in computer environments, The Language Centre, University of Brighton.
98. Sinclair, J., & Brazil, D. (1982). Teacher talk. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
99. Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
100. Sirc, G., & Reynolds, T. (1993). Seeing students as writers. In B. Bruce, J. K. Peyton, & T. Batson (Eds.), Network-based classrooms: Promises and realities (pp. 138-160). New York: Cambridge University Press.
101. Slater, P., & Carpenter, C. (1999). Introducing e-mail into a course in French as a second language In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), Writing in an electronic medium: Research with language learners (pp. 267-283). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
102. Snyder, I. A. (1990). The impact of word processors on students' writing: A comparative study of the effects of pens and word processors on writing context, process and product. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Monash University.
103. Snyder, I. (1993). Writing with word processors: A research overview. Educational Research, 35, 49-68.
104. Snyder, I. (1998). Beyond the hype: Reassessing hypertext. In L. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 125-143). London and New York: Routledge.
105. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the "social" in computer-mediated communication. In R. Spears & M. Lea (Eds.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30-65). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
106. Steelman, J. D. (1994). Revision strategies employed by middle level students using computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11, 141-152.
107. Sudol, R. R. (1985). Applied word processing: Notes on authority, responsibility, and revision in a workshop model. College Composition and Communication, 36, 331-335.
108. Sullivan, N., & Pratt, E. (1996). A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 29, 491-501.
109. Susser, B. (1993a). ESL/EFL process writing with computers. CAELL Journal, 4(2), 16-22.
110. Susser, B. (1993b). Networks and project work: Alternative pedagogies for writing with computers. Computers and Composition, 10(3), 63-89.
111. Teichman, M., & Poris, M. (1989). Initial effects of word processing on writing quality and writing anxiety of freshman writers. Computers and the Humanities, 23, 93-103.
112. Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 81, 470-481.
113. Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
114. Williamson, M. M., & Pence, P. (1989). Word processing and student writers. In B. Britton & S. M. Glynn (Eds.), Computer writing environments: Theory, research, and design (pp. 93-127). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
115. Windeatt, S., Hardisty, D., & Eastment, D. (2000). The Internet. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
116. Woodin, J. (1997). E-mail tandem learning and the communicative curriculum. ReCALL, 9(1), 22-33.