Analysing high technology adoption and impact within public supported high tech programs: An empirical case

Journal of High Technology Management Research

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 153-168

  Albors Garrigos, José ^a   Hervas Oliver, José Luis ^a   Hidalgo, Antonio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

High tech; Public innovation policies

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION PROCESS; ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY; BODY OF KNOWLEDGE; DIFFUSION MODEL; EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE; EUROPEAN COMMISSION; HIGH TECH; HIGH TECHNOLOGY; KEY VARIABLES; KNOWLEDGE FLOW; MAPPING METHODOLOGY; MULTIVARIABLE ANALYSIS; PUBLIC INNOVATION; REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE; SOCIAL IMPACT; TECHNOLOGY ABSORPTION; TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION;

ABSORPTION; DIFFUSION; MICROELECTRONICS;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 71549137754     PISSN: 10478310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.hitech.2009.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Albors J., Sweeney E., and Hidalgo A. Transnational technology transfer networks. A review of the state-of-the art and an analysis of the European IRC network. Production Planning & Control 16 4 (2005, June) 413-423
2. Arvanitis S., Kubli U., and Worter M. Determinants of knowledge and technology transfer activities between firms and science institutions in Switzerland: An analysis based on firm data (2005, December), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich
3. Audretsch D.B., Link A.N., and Scott J.T. Public/private technology partnerships: Evaluating SBIR-supported research. Research Policy 31 1 (2002, January) 145-158
4. Autio E., and Laananen T. Measurement and evaluation of technology transfer: Review of technology transfer mechanisms and indicators. International Journal of technology Management 10 7-8 (1995) 643
5. Bass F.M. A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Science 15 (1969) 215-227
6. Bozeman B. Technology Transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy 29 (2000) 627-655
7. Bozeman B., and Kingsley G. R&D Value mapping: A new approach to case study valuation. Journal of Technology Transfer 22 2 (1997) 33-42
8. Campbell S., Shipp S., Mulcahy T., and Allen T.W. Informing public policy on science and innovation: The Advanced Technology Program's experience. Journal of Technology Transfer 34 (2009) 304-319
9. Chandy R.K., and Tellis G.J. The incumbent's curse? Incumbency, size and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing 64 3 (2000) 1-17
10. Christensen C. The innovator's dilemma (1997), Harvard Business School Press, Boston
11. Cooke P., Davies C., and Wilson R. Innovation Advantages of Cities: From Knowledge to Equity in Five Basic Steps. European planning studies 10 2 (2002) 233-250
12. Cooper A.C., and Bruno A.V. Success among high technology firms. In: Storey D.J. (Ed). Small Business: Critical perspectives on Business and Management (2000), Routledge, New York
13. Crick D., and Jones M. Small high-technology firms and international high-technology markets. Journal of International Marketing 8 2 (2000) 63-85
14. David, P. A. (1986). "Technology Diffusion, Public policy and industrial competitiveness", in Davies, S. (1979): The Diffusion of Process Innovations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
15. Davies, S. (1979). The Diffusion of Process Innovations, Cambridge University Press.
16. Decter M., Bennett D., and Leseure M. University to business technology transfer, UK and USA comparisons. Technovation 27 3 (2007) 145-155
17. Dohse D. Technology policy and the regions: The case of the BioRegio contest. Research Policy 29 9 (2000) 1111-1133
18. Eickelpasch A., and Fritsch M. Contests for cooperation: New approach in German innovation policy. Research Policy 34 8 (2005) 1269-1282
19. Ergas J. Does technology policy matter?. In: Guile, and Brooks (Eds). Technology and global industry (1987), National Academy Press, Washington
20. Estrin, L. AND Foreman, J. T. (2003). Overcoming Barriers to Technology Adoption in Small Manufacturing Enterprises (SMEs), Carnegie Mellon University and Software Engineering Institute Material, N.Y.
21. Feldman M.P., and Kelley M.R. Leveraging research and development: Assessing the impact of the U.S. Advanced Technology Program. Small Business Economics 20 2 (2003) 153-165
22. Fundación Cotec, (1997). "Report on the GAME initiative", September, Madrid.
23. Gatignon H., and Robertson T.S. Technology diffusion: An empirical test of competitive effects. Journal of Marketing 35 (1989) 35-49
24. Georghiou L., and Roessner D. Evaluating technology programs: Tools and methods. Research Policy 29 4-5 (2000) 657-678
25. Geroski P.A. Models of technology diffusion. Research Policy 29 4/5 (2000) 603-625
26. Ghani K.A., Jayabalan V., and Sugumar M. Impact of advanced manufacturing technology on organizational structure. Journal of High Technology Management Research 13 2 (2002) 157-175
27. Gourlay A., and Pentecost E. The determinants of technology diffusion. Evidence from the UK financial sector. Manchester School 70 2 (2002) 185-203
28. Green G.C., Collins R.W., and Hevner A.R. Perceived control and the diffusion of software process innovations. Journal of High Technology Management Research 15 (2004) 123-144
29. Greiner M.A., and Franza R.M. Barriers and bridges for successful environmental technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer 26 (2003) 167-177
30. Hahn Y.H., and Yu P. Towards a technology policy: The integration of generation and diffusion. Technovation 19 3 (1999) 177-186
31. Hair J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., and Black W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th edition (1999), Prentice Hall
32. Hall B.H., and Khan B. Adoption of new technology. NBER Working Papers Vol. 9730 (2003), National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
33. Hubbard T. Why are process monitoring technologies valuable? The use of on-board information technology in the trucking industry. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Vol. 6482 (1998)
34. Im S., and Workman J.P. Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. Journal of Marketing 68 2 (2004) 114-132
35. Kerr S., and Newell R.G. Policy-induced technology adoption: Evidence from the U.S. lead phasedown. Journal of Industrial Economics 51 3 (2003) 317-343
36. Kingsley G. The use of case studies in R&D impact evaluation. In: Bozeman B., and Melkers J. (Eds). Evaluating R&D impacts Methods and Practice (1993), Kluwer 17-42
37. Kingsley G., Bozeman, and Coker K. Technology transfer and absorption: An R&D value mapping approach to evaluation. Research Policy 25 (1996) 967-995
38. Kingsley G., and Farmer M.C. Using technology absorption, an evaluation criterion. The case of a state R&D program. Policy Studies Journal 25 3 (1997) 436-450
39. Kingsley G., and Melkers J. Value mapping social capital outcomes in state research and development programs. Research Evaluation 8 3 (1999) 165-175
40. Kremic T. Technology transfer: A contextual approach. Journal of Technology Transfer 28 (2003) 149-158
41. Kumar N., and Saqib M. Firm size, opportunities for adaptation and in-house R & D activity in developing countries: the case of Indian manufacturing. Research Policy 25 (1996) 713-722
42. Link A.N. Evaluating the advanced technology program: A preliminary assessment of economic impacts. International Journal of Technology Management 8 No.6/7/8 (1993) 726-739
43. Link A.N., and Scott J.T. U.S. Science Parks: The diffusion of an innovation and its effects on the academic missions of universities. International Journal of Industrial Organization 2 (2003) 1323-1356
44. Löfsten H., and Lindelöf P. Science Parks and the growth of new technology-based firms, academic-industry links, innovation and markets. Research Policy 31 6 (2002) 859-876
45. Mahajan V., Muller E., and Bass F.M. New product diffusion models in marketing: A review and directions for research. In: Nakicenovic N., and Grubler A. (Eds). Diffusion of technologies and social behavior (1991), Springer, New York 125-177
46. Malhotra Y. Bringing the adopter back into the adoption process: A personal construction framework of information technology adoption. Journal of High Technology Management Research 10 1 (1999) 79-104
47. Moore G.A. Crossing the chasm: Marketing and selling high tech goods for mainstream customers (1991), Harper Business, N.Y
48. Mowery D. The practice of technology policy. In: Stoneman P. (Ed). Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change (1995), Blackwell, Oxford
49. Norman D.A. The invisible computer (1998), MIT Press, Cambridge, M.A
50. Pavelin S., and Porter L.A. The corporate social performance content of innovation in the U.K. Journal of Business Ethics 80 4 (2008) 711-725
51. Quetglás G.M., and Grau B.C. Aspects of university research and technology transfer to private industry. Journal of Business Ethics 39 1-2 (2002) 51-58
52. Reid S.E., and de Brentani U. The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: A theoretical model. Journal of Product Innovation Management 21 3 (2004) 170-184
53. Roberts J.H., and Lattin J.M. Disaggregate-level diffusion models. In: Mahajan V., Muller E., and Wind Y. (Eds). New-product diffusion models (2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 207-236
54. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of innovations (1995), The Free Press, N.Y.
55. Rogers, E. W. (2001). A theoretical look at firm performance in high-tech organizations: What does existing theory tell us? Journal of High Technology Management Research, (12), 39-61.
56. Rogers E.W. The effect of perceptions of the employment game on cooperative knowledge behaviour in high-tech firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research 15 (2004) 17-36
57. Santoro M.D., and Gopalakrishnan S. Relationship dynamics between university research centers and industrial firms: Their impact on technology transfer activities. Journal of Technology Transfer 26 163 (2001) 171
58. Sirgy M.J., and Su C. The ethics of consumer sovereignty in an age of high tech. Journal of Business Ethics 28 1 (2000) 1-14
59. Stock G.N., and Tatikonda M.V. External technology integration product and process development. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 24 7 (2004) 642-665
60. Stock G.N., and Tatikonda M.V. The joint influence of technology uncertainty and interorganizational interaction on external technology integration success. Journal of Operations Management 26 1 (2008) 65-80
61. Stoneman P., and Vickers J. The assessment: The economics of technology policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 4 (1988) I-XVI
62. Subramanian M., and Youndt M.A. The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal 48 3 (2005) 450-463
63. Sung T.K., and Gibson D.V. Knowledge and technology transfer grid: Empirical assessment. International Journal of Technology Management 29 3-4 (2005) 216-230
64. Tatikonda M.V. An empirical study of platform and derivative product development projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management 16 1 (1999) 326
65. Tatikonda M.V., and Montoya-Weiss M.M. Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation. Management Science 47 1 (2001) 151-172
66. Tatikonda M.V., and Rosenthal S.R. Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development project execution success: A deeper look at task uncertainty in product innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 47 (2000) 74-87
67. Tatikonda M.V., and Rosenthal S.R. Successful execution of product development projects: Balancing firmness and flexibility in product innovation. Journal of Operations Management 18 4 (2000) 401-425
68. Teece D.J. The market for know how and the efficient international transfer of technology. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 458 (1981) 81-96
69. Venkatesh V., and Davis F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46 2 (2000) 186-204
70. Yang J., and Liu C.Y. New product development: An innovation diffusion Perspective. Journal of High Technology Management Research 17 1 (2006) 17-26