Technology transfer and absorption: An 'R & D value-mapping' approach to evaluation

Research Policy

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 967-995

  Kingsley, Gordon ^a   Bozeman, Barry ^a   Coker, Karen ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001022862     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0048-7333(96)00890-6     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aram, J., L. Lynn and N.M. Reddy, 1992, Institutional relationships and technology commercialization: limitations of market-based policy, Research Policy 21, 409-422.
2. Atkinson, R.D., 1991, Innovation policy making in a federalist system: lessons from the States for US federal innovation policy making, Research Policy 20, 559-577.
3. Bailey, M.T., 1992, Do physicists use case studies? Thoughts on public administration research, Public Administration Review 52, 47-54.
4. Bozeman, B., 1992, NYSERDA Organization Design and Assessment (Center for Technology and Information Policy, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY).
5. Bozeman, B., 1993, Peer review and evaluation of R & D impacts, in: B. Bozeman and J. Melkers (Editors), Evaluating R & D Impacts: Methods and Practice (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) pp. 79-98.
6. Bozeman, B. and K. Coker, 1992, Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer from U.S. R & D laboratories: the impact of market orientation, Technovation 12, 239-255.
7. Bozeman, B. and M. Fellows, 1987, Technology transfer at the U.S. national laboratories: a framework for evaluation, Evaluation and Program Planning 11, 65-75.
8. Bozeman, B. and D. Roessner, 1995, Assessing the Economic and Social Impacts of Basic Research Sponsored by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences: An 'R & D Value Mapping' Approach, Final Report to Sandia National Laboratories.
9. Bozeman, B., et al., 1992a, R & D Impacts at the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority: Final Report (Center for Technology and Information Policy, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY).
10. Bozeman, B., K. Coker and G. Kingsley, 1992b, An Aggregate Case Analysis of RD&D Project Impact (Center for Technology and Information Policy, Syracuse University, Syracuse. NY).
11. Bozeman, B., M. Papadakis and K. Coker, 1995, Industry Perspectives on Commercial Interactions with Federal Laboratories. Report to the National Science Foundation, Research on Science and Technology Program, Contract No. 9220125.
12. Bretschneider, S. and B. Bozeman, 1992, Computer-Based Evaluation System: Prototype Design (Center for Technology and Information Policy, Syracuse University Syracuse, NY).
13. Brown, M.A. and C.H. Major, 1990, Technology transfer strategies of DOE's conservation programs, Journal of Technology Transfer 15, 33-40.
14. Brown, M.A., L.G. Berry and R. Goel, 1991, Guidelines for successfully transferring government-sponsored innovations, Research Policy 20, 121-143.
15. Burton, L., 1989, Indicators for state science and technology programs, Policy Studies Journal 18, 164-175.
16. Center for Technology and Information Policy, 1990, Program Impacts Monitoring Project: Task Report No. 1 (Center for Technology and Information Policy, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY).
17. Center for Technology and Information Policy, 1992, Overview of Case Studies from the Program Impacts Monitoring Project (Center for Technology and Information Policy, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY).
18. Cimitile, C. and B. Bozeman, 1992, NYSERDA Technology User Survey (Center for Technology and Information Policy, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY).
19. Czamanski, D., 1987, The effect of location subsidies on corporate decisions, Regional Science and Urban Economics 17, 411-422.
20. Dalpe, R., C. DeBresson and H. Xiaoping, 1992, The public sector as first user of innovations, Research Policy 21, 251-263.
21. Devine, M., T. James and T. Adams, 1987, Government supported industry-university research centers: issues for successful technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer 12, 27-37.
22. Eisenhardt, K.M., 1989, Building theories from case study research, Academy of Management Review 14, 532-550.
23. Feller, I., 1984, Political and administrative aspects of state high technology programs, Policy Studies Review 3, 460-466.
24. Forrer, J., 1989, State Competitive Research Grant Programs (National Governors' Association, Washington, DC).
25. Kingsley, G., 1992a, A history of technology transfer programs at the New York State Energy Research and Development Energy Authority, in: B. Bozeman (Editor), Proceedings of the National Public Management Research Conference (Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York).
26. Kingsley, G., 1992b, Using Peer Review to Assess the Impact of NYSERDA Projects (Center for Technology and Information Policy, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY).
27. Kingsley, G., 1993, The use of case studies in R & D impact evaluations, in: B. Bozeman and J. Melkers (Editors), Evaluating R & D Impacts: Methods and Practice (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) pp. 17-42.
28. Kreilkamp, K., 1971, Hindsight and the real world of science policy, Science Studies 1, 43-66.
29. Leyden, D.P., A.N. Link and B. Bozeman, 1989, The effects of governmental financing on firms' R & D activities: a theoretical and empirical investigation, Technovation 9, 561-575.
30. Link, A., 1993, Methods for evaluating return on R & D investments, in: B. Bozeman and J. Melkers (Editors), Evaluating R & D Impacts: Methods and Practice (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) pp. 1-16.
31. Logsdon, J.M. and C.B. Rubin, 1985, An Overview of Federal Research Evaluation Activities (National Science Foundation, Washington, DC).
32. Luukkonen-Gronow, T., 1987, Scientific research evaluation: a review of methods and various contexts of their application, R & D Management 17, 207-221.
33. Meyer-Krahmer, F., 1981, The present status and problems of impact research in technology policy: a case study on the federal program for funding research and development personnel in Germany, Research Policy 10, 356-366.
34. Meyer-Krahmer, F., 1988, Evaluation of industrial innovation policy: concepts, methods and lessons, in: J.D. Roessner (Editor), Government Innovation Policy: Design, Implementation, Evaluation (St. Martin's Press, New York) pp. 121-133.
35. Moore, O.K., F.E. Jefferson and M.G. Crosse, 1991, Heuristic guidelines for analyzing technology transfer: applications to case studies, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 12, 298-318.
36. Mowery, D.C. and N. Rosenberg, 1982, The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies, in: N. Rosenberg (Editor), Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (Cambridge University Press, New York).
37. Narin, F. and D. Olivastro, 1992, Status report: linkage between technology and science, Research Policy 21, 237-249.
38. National Governors' Association, 1987, The Role of Science and Technology in Economic Competitiveness (National Governors' Association, New York).
39. New York State Energy Research and Development Energy Authority, 1988, New York State Research and Development Energy Authority Operations and Procedures Manual, revised.
40. Packer, M.B., 1983, Analyzing productivity in R & D organizations, Research Management 26, 13-20.
41. Roessner, J.D., 1987, Technology policy in the United States, Technovation 5, 229-245.
42. Roessner, J.D. (Editor), 1988, Government Innovation Policy (London).
43. Roessner, J.D. and A.S. Bean, 1990, Industry interactions with federal laboratories, Journal of Technology Transfer 15, 5-14.
44. Roessner, J.D. and A.S. Bean, 1991, How industry interacts with federal laboratories, Research Technology Management 34, 22-25.
45. Schriesheim, A., 1990, Toward a golden age for technology transfer, Issues in Science and Technology (Winter), 52-58.
46. Shapira, P., J.D. Roessner and R. Barke, 1995, New public infrastructures for small firm industrial modernization in the USA, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 7, 63-84.
47. Smilor, R. and D. Gibson, 1991, Technology transfer in multi-organizational environments: the case of R & D consortia, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 38, 3-13.
48. Strauss, A. and J. Corbin, 1990, Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).
49. US General Accounting Office, 1989, Technology Transfer: Implementation Status of the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 (US GPO, Washington, DC).
50. Wycoff, A. and L. Tomatzky, 1988, State-level efforts to transfer manufacturing technology: a survey of programs and practices, Management Science 14, 469-481.
51. Yin, R.K., 1989, Case Study Research (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).