On the benchmarking method of patent-based knowledge flow structure: Comparison of Korea and Taiwan with USA

Scientometrics

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 551-574

  Shin, Juneseuk ^a   Lee, Wook ^a   Park, Yongtae ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846548615     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-006-0169-y     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. ALCORTA, L., PERES, W. (1998), Innovation systems and technological specialization in Latin America and the Caribbean, Research Policy, 26 : 857-881.
2. BALZAT, M. (2003), Benchmarking in the Context of National Innovation Systems: Purpose and Pitfalls, University of Augsburg, Institute for economics, Discussion paper series number 238.
3. CARLSSON, B., STANKIEWTCZ, R. (1991), On the nature, function, and composition of technological systems, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1 : 93-118.
4. CARLSSON, B., JACOBSSON, S., HOLMEN, M., RICKNE, A. (2002), Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues, Research Policy, 31 : 233-245.
5. CHANG, P-L., SHIH, H-Y., (2004), The innovation systems of Taiwan and China: a comparative analysis, Technovation, 24 : 529-539.
6. COE, D. T., HELPMAN, E. (1995), International R&D spillovers, European Economic Review, 39 : 859-887.
7. DEBRESSON, C., AMESSE, F. (1991), Networks of innovators: a review and introduction to the issue, Research Policy, 20 : 363-379.
8. DOSI, G., (1982), Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change, Research Policy, 2 : 147-162.
9. DREJER, I. (2000), Comparing patterns of industrial interdependence in National Systems of Innovation - a study of Germany, the United Kingdom, Japan and the United States, Economic Systems Research, 12 : 377-399.
10. EICHHORST, W., PROFIT, S., THODE, E. (Eds), (2001), Benchmarking Deutschland: Arbeitsmarkt und Beschaftigung, Bericht der Arbeitsgruppe Benchmarking und der Bertelsmann Stifung, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
11. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2000), Towards a European Research Area: Science, Technology and Innovation, Key Figures 2000, European Commission, Brussels.
12. FURMAN, J. L., PORTER, M. E., STERN, S. (2002), The determinants of national innovative capacity, Research Policy, 31 : 899-933.
13. GOTO, A., SUZUKI, K. (1989), R&D capital, rate of return on R&D investment and spillover of R&D in Japanese manufacturing industries, Review of Economics and Statistics, 71 : 555-564.
14. HALL, B. H., JAFFE, A. B., TRAJTENBERG, M. (2001), The NBER patent citations data file: lessons, insights and methodological tools, National Bureau of Economic Research working paper, no. 8498 : 3-53.
15. HATTORI, T., SATO, Y. (1997), A comparative study of development mechanisms in Korea and Taiwan: introductory analysis, The Developing Economies, 35 : 341-357.
16. HELPMAN, E. (1998), General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth, MIT Press, Cambridge.
17. HOBDAY, M. (1995), Innovation in East Asia: the challenge to Japan, Edward Elgar, Vermont.
18. HU, A. G. Z., JAFFE, A. B. (2003), Patent citations and international knowledge flow: the cases of Korea and Taiwan, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21 : 849-880.
19. INTRAKUMNERD, P., CHAIRATANA, P-A., TANGCHITPIBOON, T. (2002), National innovation system in less successful developing countries: the case of Thailand, Research Policy, 31 : 1445-1457.
20. KLINE, S. J., ROSENBERG, N. (1986), An overview of innovation. In: R. LANDAU, N. ROSENBERG (Eds), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, National Academy Press, Washington, pp. 275-305.
21. KUHN, T. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
22. KUMARESAN, N., Miyazaki, K. (1999), An integrated network approach to system of innovation-the case of robotics in Japan, Research Policy, 28 : 563-585.
23. LEONCINI, R., MONTRESSOR, S. (2005), Accounting for core and extra-core relationship in technological systems: a methodological proposal, Research Policy, 34 : 83-100.
24. LIU, X., WHITE, S. (2001), Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China's transitional context, Research Policy, 30 : 1091-1114.
25. LUNDVALL, B-A. (1988), Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In: G. DOST, C. FREEMAN, R. NELSON, G. SILVERBERG, L. SOETE (Eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter Publishers, London and New York, pp. 349-369.
26. LUNDVALL, B-A., TOMLINSON, M. (2002), International benchmarking as a policy learning tool. In: M. J. RODRIGUES (Ed.), The New Knowledge Economy in Europe: A Strategy for International Competitiveness and Social Cohesion, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
27. NASIEROWSKI, W., ARCLEUS, F. J., (2003), On the efficiency of national innovation systems, Soci-Economic Planning Sciences, 37 : 215-234.
28. NELSON, R., WINTER, S. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
29. NELSON, R. (Ed.), (1993), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
30. OECD, (1999), Managing National Innovation Systems, OECD, Paris.
31. OECD, (2000), Innovation and Economic Performance, OECD, Paris.
32. OECD, (2001), Innovative People: Mobility of Skilled Personnel in National Innovation Systems, OECD, Paris.
33. OECD, (2002.), Dynamising National Innovation Systems, OECD, Paris.
34. OECD, (2005), Main Science and Technology Indicators:2005/2 edition, OECD, Paris.
35. PARK, G., SHIN, J., PARK, Y. (2006), Measurement of depreciation rate of technological knowledge: technological cycle time approach, Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 65 : 121-127.
36. PAPACONSTANTINOU, G., SAKURAI, N., WYCKOFF, A. (1998), Domestic and international product-embodied R&D diffusion, Research Policy, 26 : 625-641.
37. PEETERS, L., TIRI, M., BERWERET, A. (2001), Identification of techno-economic clusters using input-output data: application to Flanders and Switzerland. In: OECD (2001), Innovative Clusters: Drivers of National Innovation Systems, OECD, Paris, pp. 251-272.
38. POLT, W. (2001), Benchmarking industry-science relations: the role of framework conditions, Science and Public Policy, 28 : 247-258.
39. RADOSEVIC, S. (1999), Transformation of science and technology systems into systems of innovation in Central and Eastern Europe: the emerging patterns and determinants, Structural Change and Economic-Dynamics, 10 : 277-320.
40. SAHAL, D. (1985), Technological guideposts and innovation avenues, Research Policy, 14 : 61-82.
41. SMITH, K. (2001), Cross-country comparisons: comparing economic performance in the presence of diversity, Science and Public Policy, 28 : 267-276.
42. STEPI (Science and Technology Policy Institute), (2004), Analysis of Technology-Industry Linkage and Korean Firms' Patent Strategy utilizing Information from Patent Database, STEPI, Seoul.
43. TRAJTENBERG, M. (2001), Innovation in Israel 1968-97: a comparative analysis using patent data, Research Policy, 30 : 363-390.
44. U.S. CENSUS BUREAU (2005), Foreign trade statistics from http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/country/index.html, U.S. Census Burequ, Washington, D.C.
45. VERSPAGEN, B. (1997), Measuring intersectoral technology spillovers: estimates from the European and US patent office databases, Economic System Research, 9 : 47-65.
46. WASSERMAN, S., FAUST, K. (1994), Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Massachusetts.