A dynamic analysis of the relations between the structure and the process of National Systems of Innovation using computer simulation; the case of the Dutch biotechnological sector

Research Policy

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 37-54

  Janszen, Felix H A ^a,b   Degenaars, Grada H ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Biotechnology; Computer simulation; Innovation process; System dynamics

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002786935     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00023-7     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Anderson, P.W., Arrows, K.J., Pines, D., 1988. The economy as an evolving complex system. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA.
2. Arthur, W.B., 1994. Increasing returns and path dependency in the economy. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
3. European Commission, 1996. Groenboek over innovatie. Supplement 5/95 van het Bulletin van de Europese Unie, European Commission Luxembourg.
4. Freeman, C., 1987. Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. Pinters Publishers, London.
5. Janszen, F.H.A., 1994. R&D management and the role of the primary process in Research and Development. In: -Khalil, T.M., Bayraktar, B.A. (Eds.), Management of Technology V. Industrial Engineering and Management Press, Norcross, GA, pp. 434-443.
6. Leenders, M.A.A.M., Janszen, F.H.A., 1995. Coupling Market and Technology: the Role of Entrepreneurship and Experimental Learning Circles in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Proceedings for the R&D Management Conference 'Knowledge, Technology and Innovative Organizations', September 20-22, S. Mianiato, Pisa, Italy.
7. Levinthal, D., Myatt, J., 1994. Co-evolution of capabilities and industry: the evolution of mutual fund processing. Strategic Manage. J. 15, 45-62.
8. Lundvall, B., 1992. National systems of innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinters Publishers, London.
9. Nelson, R.R. (Ed.), 1993. National innovation systems. A Comparative Analysis. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
10. Nelson, R.R., 1995. Co-evolution of industry structure, technology and supporting institutions, and the making of comparative advantage. Int. J. Bus. Econ. 2, 171-184.
11. Nicolis, G., Prigogine, I., 1994. The fourth European Framework program and research on complex systems, paper on: The university. Facing up its European responsibilities, Pisa, 23-26 November.
12. Porter, M., 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. Macmillan, London.
13. Porter, A.L., Roper, A.T., Mason, T.W., Rossini, F.A., Banks, J., 1991. Forecasting and Management of Technology. Wiley series in engineering and technology management, New York.
14. Roberts, E.B., 1991. Entrepreneurs in high technology. Lessons from MIT and Beyond. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
15. Rosenberg, N., 1979. Inside the black box. Technology and Economics. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.