Systems analysis of cellular networks under uncertainty

FEBS Letters

Volumn 583, Issue 24, 2009, Pages 3923-3930

  Kaltenbach, Hans Michael ^a   Dimopoulos, Sotiris ^a   Stelling, Jörg ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Chemical reaction network theory; Dynamic model; Ensemble modeling; Monotone system; Structural network analysis; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; BAYES THEOREM; CELL COMPOSITION; CELL COUNT; CELL INTERACTION; CELL METABOLISM; CELL STRUCTURE; CHEMICAL REACTION; CYTOLOGY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MACHINE LEARNING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STOICHIOMETRY; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; THERMODYNAMICS;

METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 71149116758     PISSN: 00145793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.10.074     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Kitano H. Systems biology: A brief overview. Science 295 5560 (2002) 1662-1664
2. Noble D. Claude Bernard, the first systems biologist, and the future of physiology. Exp. Physiol. 93 1 (2008) 16-26
3. Kitano H. Computational systems biology. Nature 420 (2002) 206-210
4. Kim H.D., et al. Transcriptional regulatory circuits: Predicting numbers from alphabets. Science 325 5939 (2009) 429-432
5. Hoffman F.O., and Hammonds J.S. Propagation of uncertainty in risk assessments: The need to distinguish between uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and uncertainty due to variability. Risk Anal. 14 5 (1994) 707-712
6. Shahrezaei V., and Swain P.S. The stochastic nature of biochemical networks. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 19 4 (2008) 369-374
7. Losick R., and Desplan C. Stochasticity and cell fate. Science 320 5872 (2008) 65-68
8. Kaern M., et al. Stochasticity in gene expression: From theories to phenotypes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6 6 (2005) 451-464
9. Claassen M., Aebersold R., and Buhmann J.M. Proteome coverage prediction with infinite Markov models. Bioinformatics 25 12 (2009) i154-i160
10. Pena-Castillo L., and Hughes T.R. Why are there still over 1000 uncharacterized yeast genes?. Genetics 176 1 (2007) 7-14
11. Hillenmeyer M.E., et al. The chemical genomic portrait of yeast: Uncovering a phenotype for all genes. Science 320 5874 (2008) 362-365
12. Schaber J., Liebermeister W., and Klipp E. Nested uncertainties in biochemical models. IET Syst. Biol. 3 1 (2009) 1-9
13. Goldenfeld N., and Kadanoff L.P. Simple lessons from complexity. Science 284 5411 (1999) 87-89
14. Horn F., and Jackson R. General mass action kinetics. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 47 2 (1972) 81-116
15. Savinell J.M., and Palsson B.O. Network analysis of intermediary metabolism using linear optimization. Development of mathematical formalism. J. Theor. Biol. 154 (1992) 421-454
16. Rocha I., Forster J., and Nielsen J. Design and application of genome-scale reconstructed metabolic models. Methods Mol. Biol. 416 (2008) 409-431
17. Feist A.M., et al. Reconstruction of biochemical networks in microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7 2 (2008) 129-143
18. Papin J.A., et al. Comparison of network-based pathway analysis methods. Trends Biotechnol. 22 (2004) 400-405
19. Clarke B.L. Stoichiometric network analysis. Cell Biophys. 12 (1988) 237-253
20. Klamt S., and Stelling J. Stoichiometric and constraint-based modeling. In: Szallasi Z., Stelling J., and Perival V. (Eds). System Modeling in Cellular Biology (2006), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 73-96
21. Schuster S., Fell D.A., and Dandekar T. A general definition of metabolic pathways useful for systematic organization and analysis of complex metabolic networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 18 3 (2000) 326-332
22. Stelling J., et al. Metabolic network structure determines key aspects of functionality and regulation. Nature 420 6912 (2002) 190-193
23. Terzer M., and Stelling J. Large-scale computation of elementary flux modes with bit pattern trees. Bioinformatics 24 19 (2008) 2229-2235
24. Teusink B., et al. Understanding the adaptive growth strategy of Lactobacillus plantarum by in silico optimisation. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5 6 (2009) e1000410
25. Kaleta C., de Figueiredo L.F., and Schuster S. Can the whole be less than the sum of its parts? Pathway analysis in genome-scale metabolic networks using elementary flux patterns. Genome Res. 19 10 (2009) 1872-1883
26. Barrett C.L., et al. The global transcriptional regulatory network for metabolism in Escherichia coli exhibits few dominant functional states. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 52 (2005) 19103-19108
27. Gianchandani E.P., et al. Functional states of the genome-scale Escherichia coli transcriptional regulatory system. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5 6 (2009) e1000403
28. Segre D., Vitkup D., and Church G.M. Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 23 (2002) 15112-15117
29. Shlomi T., Berkman O., and Ruppin E. Regulatory on/off minimization of metabolic flux changes after genetic perturbations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 21 (2005) 7695-7700
30. Uhr M., and Stelling J. Structural sensitivity analysis of metabolic networks. Proc. 17th World Congress, The International Federation of Automatic Control, Seoul, Korea, July 6-11 (2008), IFAC
31. Horn F. Necessary and sufficient conditions for complex balancing in chemical kinetics. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 49 3 (1972) 172-186
32. Feinberg M. Multiple steady states for chemical reaction networks of deficiency one. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 132 (1995) 371-406
33. Feinberg M. The existence and uniqueness of steady states for a class of chemical reaction networks. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 132 (1995) 311-370
34. Craciun G., Tang Y., and Feinberg M. Understanding bistability in complex enzyme-driven reaction networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 23 (2006) 8697-8702
35. Sontag E. Structure and stability of certain chemical networks and applications to the kinetic proofreading model of T-cell receptor signal transduction. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 46 (2001) 1028-1047
36. Shinar G., Alon U., and Feinberg M. Sensitivity and robustness in chemical reaction networks. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 69 4 (2008) 977-998
37. Otero-Muras I., Banga J.R., and Alonso A.A. Exploring multiplicity conditions in enzymatic reaction networks. Biotechnol. Prog. 25 3 (2009) 619-631
38. Savageau M.A., et al. Phenotypes and tolerances in the design space of biochemical systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 16 (2009) 6435-6440
39. Uhr, M., et al. (2009) Analysis of degenerate chemical reaction networks. In: Proc. Positive Systems: Theory and Applications.
40. Conradi C., et al. Subnetwork analysis reveals dynamic features of complex (bio)chemical networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 49 (2007) 19175-19180
41. Conradi, C., et al. (2005) Using chemical reaction network theory to discard a kinetic mechanism hypothesis. In: Proc. 2005 Foundations of Systems Biology in Engineering Conference.
42. Angeli D., and Sontag E.D. Monotone control systems. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 48 10 (2003) 1684-1698
43. Angeli D., and Sontag E.D. Multi-stability in monotone input/output systems. Syst. Control Lett. 51 3-4 (2004) 185-202
44. Sontag E. Monotone and near-monotone biochemical networks. Syst. Synth. Biol 1 2 (2007) 59-87
45. Smith H. Monotone dynamical systems: An introduction to the theory of competitive and cooperative systems (1995), American Mathematical Society (AMS)
46. Moles C.G., Mendes P., and Banga J.R. Parameter estimation in biochemical pathways: A comparison of global optimization methods. Genome Res. 13 (2003) 2467-2474
47. Jaqaman K., and Danuser G. Linking data to models: Data regression. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7 11 (2006) 813-819
48. W.H. Press, S.A.T., W.T. Vetterling, B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing. 3rd ed. 2007: Cambridge University Press.
49. Liu J.S. Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing. second ed. Springer Series in Statistics xvi (2008), Springer, New York p. 343
50. Lemieux C. Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Sampling. Springer Series in Statistics. first ed. (2009), Springer
51. Joshi M., Seidel-Morgenstern A., and Kremling A. Exploiting the bootstrap method for quantifying parameter confidence intervals in dynamical systems. Metab. Eng. 8 5 (2006) 447-455
52. Turkheimer F.E., Hinz R., and Cunningham V.J. On the undecidability among kinetic models: From model selection to model averaging. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 23 4 (2003) 490-498
53. Wahl S.A., et al. Unravelling the regulatory structure of biochemical networks using stimulus response experiments and large-scale model selection. Syst. Biol. (Stevenage) 153 4 (2006) 275-285
54. Marino S., et al. A methodology for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in systems biology. J. Theor. Biol. 254 1 (2008) 178-196
55. Lorenz S., et al. Discrimination of dynamical system models for biological and chemical processes. J. Comput. Chem. 28 8 (2007) 1384-1399
56. Johnson J.B., and Omland K.S. Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 19 2 (2004) 101-108
57. Lucas L.J., Owhadi H., and Ortiz M. Rigorous verification, validation, uncertainty quantification and certification through concentration-of-measure inequalities. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 197 51-52 (2008) 4591-4609
58. Kauffman S. A proposal for using the ensemble approach to understand genetic regulatory networks. J. Theor. Biol. 230 4 (2004) 581-590
59. Steuer R., et al. Structural kinetic modeling of metabolic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 32 (2006) 11868-11873
60. Tran L.M., Rizk M.L., and Liao J.C. Ensemble modeling of metabolic networks. Biophys. J. 95 12 (2008) 5606-5617
61. Küpfer L., et al. Ensemble modeling for analysis of cell signaling dynamics. Nat. Biotechnol. 25 (2007) 1001-1006
62. Markowetz F., and Spang R. Inferring cellular networks - A review. BMC Bioinform. 8 6 (2007) S5
63. Stelling J., et al. Robustness of cellular functions. Cell 118 6 (2004) 675-685