Metabolic network structure determines key aspects of functionality and regulation

Nature

Volumn 420, Issue 6912, 2002, Pages 190-193

  Stelling, Jörg ^a   Klamt, Steffen ^a   Bettenbrock, Katja ^a   Schuster, Stefan ^b   Gilles, Ernst Dieter ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DYNAMICS OF COMPLEX TECHNICAL SYSTEMS   (Germany)

^b MAX DELBRÜCK CENTER FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; METABOLISM; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

CELLULAR NETWORKS;

BIOCHEMISTRY;

BIOLOGY; METABOLISM;

AEROBIC METABOLISM; ARTICLE; CELL FUNCTION; CELL KINETICS; CELL METABOLISM; CELL STRUCTURE; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PHENOTYPE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; STEADY STATE; THERMODYNAMICS;

BIOMASS; CELL PHYSIOLOGY; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENERGY METABOLISM; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, BACTERIAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHENOTYPE; SYSTEMS THEORY;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 0037079050     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature01166     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Dandekar, T., Schuster, S., Snel, B., Huynen, M. & Bork, P. Pathway alignment: Application to the comparative analysis of glycolytic enzymes. Biochem. J. 343, 115-124 (1999).
2. Edwards, J. S. & Palsson, B. O. The Escherichia coli MG1655 in silico metabolic phenotype: Its definition, characteristics and capabilities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 5528-5533 (2000).
3. Cornish-Bowden, A. & Cardenas, M. L. Complex networks of interactions connect genes to phenotypes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 463-465 (2001).
4. Kitano, H. Systems Biology: A brief overview. Science 295, 1662-1664 (2002).
5. Jeong, H., Tombor, B., Albert, R., Oltvai, Z. N. & Barabási, A.-L. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 407, 651-654 (2000).
6. Edwards, J. S., Ibarra, R. U. & Palsson, B. O. In silico predictions of Escherichia coli metabolic capabilities are consistent with experimental data. Nature Biotechnol. 19, 125-130 (2001).
7. Schuster, S., Dandekar, T. & Fell, D. A. Detection of elementary flux modes in biochemical networks: A promising tool for pathway analysis and metabolic engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 17, 53-60 (1999).
8. Schuster, S., Fell, D. A. & Dandekar, T. A general definition of metabolic pathways useful for systematic organization and analysis of complex metabolic networks. Nature Biotechnol. 18, 326-332 (2000).
9. 4 metabolism. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 78, 296-312 (2002).
10. Oh, M.-K. & Liao, J. C. Gene expression profiling by DNA microarrays and metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Prog. 16, 278-286 (2000).
11. Heinrich, R. & Schuster, S. The Regulation of Cellular Systems (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1996).
12. Canonaco, F. et al. Metabolic flux response to phosphoglucose isomerase knock-out in Escherichia coli and impact of overexpression of the soluble transhydrogenase UdhA. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 204, 247-252 (2001).
13. Barkai, N. & Leibler, S. Robustness in simple biochemical networks. Nature 387, 913-917 (1997).
14. von Dassow, G., Meir, E., Munro, E. M. & Odell, G. M. The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature 406, 188-192 (2000).
15. Stelling, J. & Gilles, E. D. in Proc. 2nd Intl Conf. Syst. Biol. (eds Yi, T. M., Hucka, M., Morohashi, M. & Kitano, H.) 181-190 (Omnipress, Madison, WI, 2001).
16. Csete, M. E. & Doyle, J. C. Reverse engineering of biological complexity. Science 295, 1664-1669 (2002).
17. Strogatz, S. H. Exploring complex networks. Nature 410, 268-276 (2001).
18. ter Kuile, B. H. & Westerhoff, H. V. Transcriptome meets metabolome: Hierarchical and metabolic regulation of the glycolytic pathway. FEBS Lett. 500, 169-171 (2001).
19. Oh, M.-K., Rohlin, L., Kao, K. C. & Liao, J. C. Global expression profiling of acetate grown Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 13175-13183 (2002).
20. Pfeiffer, T., Schuster, S. & Bonhoeffer, S. Cooperation and competition in the evolution of ATP-producing pathways. Science 292, 504-507 (2001).
21. Cleveland, W. S. Visualizing Data (AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ, 1993).
22. Covert, M. W. & Palsson, B. O. Transcriptional regulation in constraints-based metabolic models of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 28058-28064 (2002).
23. Stelling, J., Kremling, A., Ginkel, M., Bettenbrock, K. & Gilles, E. D. Foundations of Systems Biology (ed. Kitano, H.) 189-212 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001).
24. Schilling, C. H., Letscher, D. & Palsson, B. O. Theory for the systemic definition of metabolic pathways and their use in interpreting metabolic function from a pathway-oriented perspective. J. Theor. Biol. 203, 229-248 (2000).
25. Marcotte, E. M. et al. A combined algorithm for genome-wide prediction of protein function. Nature 402, 83-86 (1999).
26. Holter, N. S. et al. Fundamental patterns underlying gene expression profiles: Simplicity from complexity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 8409-8414 (2000).
27. Ge, H., Liu, Z., Church, G. M. & Vidal, M. Correlation between transcriptome and interactome mapping data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature Genet. 29, 482-486 (2001).
28. Klamt, S., Stelling, J., Ginkel, M. & Gilles, E. D. FluxAnalyzer: Exploring structure, pathways, and flux distributions in metabolic networks on interactive flux maps. Bioinformatics (in the press).
29. Bilke, S. & Peterson, C. Topological properties of citation and metabolic networks. Phys. Rev. E 64, 036106 (2001).