Modeling conceptions revisited

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 247-254

  Sriraman, Bharath ^a   Lesh, Richard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70849137011     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02652808     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Burkhardt, H. (2006). Modelling in mathematics classrooms. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, vol. 38, no.2, pp. 178-195.
2. D'Ambrosio, U. (1998). Mathematics and peace: Our responsibilities. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, vol. 30, no.3, 67-73.
3. Galbraith P., & Stillman, G. (2006). A framework for identifying student blockages during transitions in the modelling process. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, vol 38, no.2, pp. 143-162.
4. Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and Writing the World with Mathematics: Toward a Pedagogy for Social Justice. New York: Routledge.
5. Kaiser, G., & Schwarz, B. (2006). Mathematical modelling as bridge between school and university. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, vol 38, no.2, pp. 196-208.
6. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Lesh, R. (2006, in press). New Directions for Research on Mathematical Problem Solving. Plenary Lecture at 2006 Annual Meeting of the Mathematics Education Research Group in Australia (MERGA).
8. Lesh, R., & English, L (2005). Trends in the evolution of the models-modeling perspective on mathematical learning and problem solving. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, vol.37,no.6, pp.487-489.
9. Lesh, R., Kaput, J., & Hamilton, E. (Eds.) (2006, in press), Foundations for the Future: The Need for New Mathematical Understandings & Abilities in the 21st Century. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Lesh, R & Sriraman, B. (2005a). John Dewey Revisited- Pragmatism and the models-modeling perspective on mathematical learning. In A. Beckmann, C. Michelsen & B. Sriraman [Eds.], Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Mathematics and its Connections to the Arts and Sciences. May 18-21, 2005, University of Schwaebisch Gmuend: Germany.Franzbecker Verlag, pp. 32-51.
11. Lesh, R & Sriraman, B (2005b). Mathematics Education as a design science. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, vol 37, no.6,pp. 490-505.
12. Lesh, R., & Yoon, C. (2004). Evolving communities of mind - in which development involves several interacting and simultaneously developing strands. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, vol.6, no.2, pp. 205-226.
13. Lester, F. K., & Kehle, P. E. (2003). From problem solving to modeling: The evolution of thinking about research on complex mathematical activity. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr, (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching (pp. 501-518). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Michelsen, C. (2006). Commentary to Lesh & Sriraman: Mathematics Education as a Design Science. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, vol.38, no.1, pp. 73-76.
15. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics.
16. PISA (1999). Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills - A New Framework for Assessment, OECD, ed. Paris: OECD.
17. PISA (2003). The PISA 2003 Assessment Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills, OECD, ed. Paris, URL https://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/51/33707192.pdf
18. Pollak, H. O. (2003) A History of the Teaching of Modelling, in Stanic, G. M. A. and Kilpatrick, J. (eds). A History of School Mathematics (pp 647-672), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.
19. Senk, S., & Thompson, D. (2003). Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? Do they work. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
20. Skovsmose, O. (2000). Aporism and critical mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, vol.20, no.1, pp. 2-8.
21. Sriraman, B., Adrian, H., and Knott, L. (pre-print). The Mathematics of Estimation: Possibilities for Interdisciplinary Pedagogy and Social Consciousness.
22. Steen, L.A. (2001). Revolution by Stealth: Redefining University Mathematics. In Derek Holton (Ed), Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at the University Level. Proceedings of the 1998 ICMI Study Conference Singapore, pp. 303-312.
23. Steen, L. A. (2002). Mathematics and Democracy: the case for quantitative literacy, the National Council on Education and the Disciplines (NCED), USA. URL http://www.maa.org/ql/mathanddemocracy.html
24. Steen, L.A. (2005). Math & Bio 2010: Linking Undergraduate Disciplines. Mathematical Association of America Press.
25. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.