Effects of recombination on complex regulatory circuits

Genetics

Volumn 183, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 673-684

  Martin, Olivier C ^a   Wagner, Andreas ^b,c,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c SANTA FE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS   (Switzerland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; GENE DELETION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; MALE; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 70649083250     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 00166731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.109.104174     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. AZEVEDO, R. B. R., R. LOHAUS, S. SRINIVASAN, K. K. DANG and C. L. BURCH, 2006 Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks. Nature 440: 87-90.
2. BARTON, N. H., and B. CHARLESWORTH, 1998 Why sex and recombination? Science 281: 1986-1990.
3. BERGMAN, A., and M. SIEGAL, 2003 Evolutionary capacitance as a general feature of complex gene networks. Nature 424: 549-552.
4. BIRKY, C. W., 1996 Heterozygosity, heteromorphy, and phylogenetic trees in asexual eukaryotes. Genetics 144: 427-437.
5. BONHOEFFER, S., C. CHAPPEY, N. T. PARKIN, J. M. WHITCOMB and C. J. PETROPOULOS, 2004 Evidence for positive epistasis in HIV-1. Science 306: 1547-1550.
6. BURGER, R., 1999 Evolution of genetic variability and the advantage of sex and recombination in changing environments. Genetics 153: 1055-1069.
7. BURGER, R., 2000 The Mathematical Theory of Selection, Recombination, and Mutation. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
8. CHANG, C. C. J., T. T. CHEN, B. W. COX, G. N. DAWES, W. P. C. STEMMER et al., 1999 Evolution of a cytokine using DNA family shuffling. Nat. Biotechnol. 17: 793-797.
9. CILIBERTI, S., O. C. MARTIN and A. WAGNER, 2007 Circuit topology and the evolution of robustness in complex regulatory gene networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3(2): e15.
10. COOPER, T. F., 2007 Recombination speeds adaptation by reducing competition between beneficial mutations in populations of Escherichia coli. PLoS Biol. 5: 1899-1905.
11. CRAMERI, A., G. DAWES, E. RODRIGUEZ, S. SILVER and W. STEMMER, 1997 Molecular evolution of an arsenate detoxification pathway DNA shuffling. Nat. Biotechnol. 15: 436-438.
12. CRAMERI, A., S. RAILLARD, E. BERMUDEZ and W. STEMMER, 1998 DNA shuffling of a family of genes from diverse species accelerates directed evolution. Nature 391: 288-291.
13. DE VISSER, J. A. G. M., C. ZEYL, P. GERRISH, J. BLANCHARD and R. LENSKI, 1999 Diminishing returns from mutation supply rate in asexual populations. Science 283: 404-406.
14. DE VISSER, G. M., S.-C. PARK and J. KRUG, 2008 Exploring the effect of sex on an empirical fitness landscape. http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.3002
15. DRAKE, J. W., B. CHARLESWORTH, D. CHARLESWORTH and J. F. CROW, 1998 Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics 148: 1667-1686.
16. DRUMMOND, D. A., J. J. SILBERG, M. M. MEYER, C. O. WILKE and F. H. ARNOLD, 2005 On the conservative nature of intragenic recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 5380-5385.
17. FELSENSTEIN, J., 1974 The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics 78: 737-756.
18. FISHER, R. A., 1930 The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
19. GARDNER, A., and A. T. KALINKA, 2006 Recombination and the evolution of mutational robustness. J. Theor. Biol. 241: 707-715.
20. HUERTA-SANCHEZ, E., and R. DURRETT, 2007 Wagner's canalization model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 71: 121-130.
21. JAEGER, J., S. SURKOVA, M. BLAGOV, H. JANSSENS, D. KOSMAN et al., 2004 Dynamic control of positional information in the early Drosophila embryo. Nature 430: 368-371.
22. JUDSON, O. P., and B. B. NORMARK, 1996 Ancient asexual scandals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: A41-A46.
23. KANEKO, K., 2008 Life: An Introduction to Complex Systems Biology. Springer, Berlin.
24. KEIGHTLEY, P. D., and S. P. OTTO, 2006 Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations. Nature 443: 89-92.
25. KIMURA, M., 1983 The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
26. KOLKMAN, J., and W. STEMMER, 2001 Directed evolution of proteins by exon shuffling. Nat. Biotechnol. 19: 423-428.
27. KONDRASHOV, A., 1998 Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature 336: 435-440.
28. KOUYOS, R. D., S. P. OTTO and S. BONHOEFFER, 2006 Effect of varying epistasis on the evolution of recombination. Genetics 173: 589-597. (Pubitemid 43945881)
29. KOUYOS, R. D., O. K. SILANDER and S. BONHOEFFER, 2007 Epistasis between deleterious mutations and the evolution of recombination. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 308-315.
30. LECLERC, R. D., 2008 Survival of the sparsest: robust gene networks are parsimonious. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4: 213.
31. LEONG, S., J. CHANG, R. ONG, G. DAWES, W. STEMMER et al., 2003 Optimized expression and specific activity of IL-12 by directed molecular evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 1163-1168.
32. MACCARTHY, T., and A. BERGMAN, 2007 Coevolution of robustness, epistasis, and recombination favors asexual reproduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 12801-12806.
33. MAYNARD SMITH, J., 1978 The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
34. MISEVIC, D., C. OFRIA and R. E. LENSKI, 2006 Sexual reproduction reshapes the genetic architecture of digital organisms. Proc. Biol. Sci. 273: 457-464.
35. MJOLSNESS, E., D. H. SHARP and J. REINITZ, 1991 A connectionist model of development. J. Theor. Biol. 152: 429-453.
36. MULLER, H., 1964 The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutat. Res. 106: 2-9.
37. MULLER, H. J., 1932 Some genetic aspects of sex. Am. Nat. 66: 118-138.
38. MULLER, H. J., 1950 Our load or mutations. Genetics 2: 111-175.
39. MYERS, S., C. C. A. SPENCER, A. AUTON, L. BOTTOLO, C. FREEMAN et al., 2006 The distribution and causes of meiotic recombination in the human genome. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 34: 526-530.
40. OTTO, S. P., and M. W. FELDMAN, 1997 Deleterious mutations, variable epistatic interactions, and the evolution of recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. 51: 134-147.
41. OTTO, S. P., and A. C. GERSTEIN, 2006 Why have sex? The population genetics of sex and recombination. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 34: 519-522.
42. OTTO, S. P., and T. LENORMAND, 2002 Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3: 252-261.
43. RAILLARD, S., A. KREBBER, Y. CHEN, J. NESS, E. BERMUDEZ et al., 2001a Novel enzyme activities and functional plasticity revealed by recombining highly homologous enzymes. Chem. Biol. 8: 891-898.
44. RAILLARD, S., A. KREBBER, Y. C. CHEN, J. E. NESS, E. BERMUDEZ et al., 2001b Novel enzyme activities and functional plasticity revealed by recombining highly homologous enzymes. Chem. Biol. 8: 891-898.
45. SANJUAN, R., and S. F. ELENA, 2006 Epistasis correlates to genomic complexity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 14402-14405.
46. SANJUAN, R., J. FORMENT and S. F. ELENA, 2006 In silico predicted robustness of viroid RNA secondary structures. II. Interaction between mutation pairs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23: 2123-2130.
47. SCHON, I., R. K. BUTLIN, H. I. GRIFFITHS and K. MARTENS, 1998 Slow molecular evolution in an ancient asexual ostracod. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 265: 235-242.
48. SCHUSTER, P., W. FONTANA, P. STADLER and I. HOFACKER, 1994 From sequences to shapes and back: a case-study in RNA secondary structures. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 255: 279-284.
49. SHARP, D. H., and J. REINITZ, 1998 Prediction of mutant expression patterns using gene circuits. Biosystems 47: 79-90.
50. SIEGAL, M., and A. BERGMAN, 2002 Waddington's canalization revisited: developmental stability and evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 10528-10532.
51. STEMMER, W., 1994 DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: in-vitro recombination for molecular evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 10747-10751.
52. VAN NIMWEGEN, E., J. CRUTCHFIELD and M. HUYNEN, 1999 Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 9716-9720.
53. WAGNER, A., 1996 Does evolutionary plasticity evolve? Evolution 50: 1008-1023.
54. WAGNER, A., 2005 Robustness and Evolvability in Living Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
55. WILKE, C. O., 2004 The speed of adaptation in large asexual populations. Genetics 167: 2045-2053.
56. ZHANG, J., G. DAWES and W. STEMMER, 1997 Directed evolution of a fucosidase from a galactosidase by DNA shuffling and screening. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 4504-4509.
57. ZHANG, Y., K. PERRY, V. VINCI, K. POWELL, W. STEMMER et al., 2002 Genome shuffling leads to rapid phenotypic improvement in bacteria. Nature 415: 644-646.