The speed of adaptation in large asexual populations

Genetics

Volumn 167, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 2045-2053

  Wilke, Claus O ^a,b  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b KECK GRADUATE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENSITY; GENE MUTATION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REPRODUCTION, ASEXUAL;

EID: 4644276948     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.027136     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. BARTON, N. H., 1995 Linkage and the limits to natural selection. Genetics 140: 821-841.
2. BULL, J. J., M. R. BADGETT and H. A. WICHMAN, 2000 Big-benefit mutations in a bacteriophage inhibited with heat. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 942-950.
3. CAMPOS, P. R. A., 2004 Fixation of beneficial mutations in the presence of epistatic interactions. Bull. Math. Biol. 66: 473-486.
4. CROW, J. F., and M. KIMURA, 1965 Evolution in sexual and asexual populations. Am. Nat. 99: 439-450.
5. DE VISSER, J. A. G. M., C. W. ZEYL, P. J. GERRISH, J. L. BLANCHARD and R. E. LENSKI, 1999 Diminishing returns from mutation supply rate in asexual populations. Science 283: 404-406.
6. ELENA, S. F., and A. MOYA, 1999 Rate of deleterious mutation and the distribution of its effects on fitness in vesicular stomatitis virus. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 1078-1088.
7. FELSENSTEIN, J., 1974 The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics 78: 737-756.
8. FERNÁNDEZ, J., and C. LÓPEZ-FANJUL, 1996 Spontaneous mutational variances and covariances for fitness-related traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 143: 829-837.
9. GARCÍA-DORADO, A., 1997 The rate and effects distribution of viable mutation in Drosophila: minimum distance estimation. Evolution 51: 1130-1139.
10. GERRISH, P., 2001 The rhythm of microbial adaptation. Nature 413: 299-302.
11. GERRISH, P. J., and R. E. LENSKI, 1998 The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population. Genetica 102/103: 127-144.
12. GILLESPIE, J. H., 1983 A simple stochastic gene substitution model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 23: 202-215.
13. GILLESPIE, J. H., 1991 The Causes of Molecular Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.
14. GORDO, I., and B. CHARLESWORTH, 2000 The degeneration of asexual haploid populations and the speed of Muller's ratchet. Genetics 154: 1379-1387.
15. HAIGH, J., 1978 The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population-Muller's ratchet. Theor. Popul. Biol. 14: 251-267.
16. HILL, W. G., and A. ROBERTSON, 1966 The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8: 269-294.
17. IMHOF, M., and C. SCHLÖTTERER, 2001 Fitness effects of advantageous mutations in evolving Escherichia coli populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 1113-1117.
18. IWASA, Y., F. MICHOK and M. A. NOWAK, 2004 Evolutionary dynamics of invasion and escape. J. Theor. Biol. 226: 205-214.
19. JOHNSON, T., and N. H. BARTON, 2002 The effect of deleterious alleles on adaptation in asexual populations. Genetics 162: 395-411.
20. KEIGHTLEY, P. D., 1996 Nature of deleterious mutation load in Drosophila. Genetics 144: 1993-1999.
21. KEIGHTLEY, P. D., and A. CABALLERO, 1997 Genomic mutation rates for lifetime reproductive output and lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 3823-3827.
22. KIBOTA, T. T., and M. LYNCH, 1996 Estimate of the genomic mutation rate deleterious to overall fitness in E. coli. Nature 381: 694-696.
23. KICHLER HOLDER, K., and J. J. BULL, 2001 Profiles of adaptation in two similar viruses. Genetics 159: 1393-1404.
24. KIM, Y., and W. STEPHAN, 2003 Selective sweeps in the presence of interference among partially linked loci. Genetics 164: 389-398.
25. KIMURA, M., and T. OHTA, 1971 Theoretical Aspects of Population Genetics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
26. KIRBY, D. A., and W. STEPHAN, 1996 Multi-locus selection and the structure of variation at the white gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 144: 635-645.
27. MCVEAN, G. A. T., and B. CHARLESWORTH, 2000 The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Genetics 155: 929-944.
28. MIRALLES, R., P. J. GERRISH, A. MOYA and S. F. ELENA, 1999 Clonal interference and the evolution of RNA viruses. Science 285: 1745-1747.
29. MIRALLES, R., A. MOYA and S. F. ELENA, 2000 Diminishing returns of population size in the rate of RNA virus adaptation. J. Virol. 74: 3566-3571.
30. MUKAI, T., S. I. CHIGUSA, L. E. METTLER and J. F. CROW, 1972 Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 72: 335-355.
31. MULLER, H. J., 1964 The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutat. Res. 1: 2-9.
32. NOVELLA, I. S., E. A. DUARTE, S. F. ELENA, A. MOYA, E. DOMINGO et al, 1995 Exponential increases of RNA virus fitness during large population transmissions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 5841-5844.
33. OHNISHI, O., 1977 Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Homozygous effect of polygenic mutations. Genetics 87: 529-545.
34. ORR, H. A., 2000 The rate of adaptation in asexuals. Genetics 155: 961-968.
35. ORR, H. A., 2003 The distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations. Genetics 163: 1519-1526.
36. ORR, H. A., and Y. KIM, 1998 An adaptive hypothesis for the evolution of the Y chromosome. Genetics 150: 1693-1698.
37. OTTO, S. P., and C. D. JONES, 2000 Detecting the undetected: estimating the total number of loci underlying a quantitative trait. Genetics 156: 2093-2107.
38. ROZEN, D. E., J. A. G. M. DE VISSER and P. J. GERRISH, 2002 Fitness effects of fixed beneficial mutations in microbial populations. Curr. Biol. 12: 1040-1045.
39. SHABALINA, S. A., and L. Y. Y. A. S. KONDRASHOV, 1997 Rapid decline of fitness in panmictic populations of Drosophila melanogaster maintained under relaxed natural selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 13034-13039.
40. STEPHAN, W., 1995 Perturbation analysis of a 2-locus model with directional selection and recombination. J. Math. Biol. 34: 95-109.
41. VAN NIMWEGEN, E., J. P. CRUTCHFIELD and M. HUYNEN, 1999 Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 9716-9720.
42. WICHMAN, H. A., M. R. BADGETT, L. A. SCOTT, C. M. BOULIANNE and J. J. BULL, 1999 Different trajectories of parallel evolution during viral adaptation. Science 285: 422-424.
43. WILKE, C. O., 2003 Probability of fixation of an advantageous mutant in a viral quasispecies. Genetics 163: 467-474.
44. WILKE, C. O., and C. ADAMI, 2003 Evolution of mutational robustness. Mutat. Res. 522: 3-11.
45. WILKE, C. O., and I. S. NOVELLA, 2003 Phenotypic mixing and hiding may contribute to memory in viral quasispecies. BMC Microbiol. 3: 11.
46. WILKE, C. O., J. L. WANG, C. OFRIA, R. E. LENSKI and C. ADAMI, 2001 Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rate leads to survival of the flattest. Nature 412: 331-333.