Women's and residents' experiences of communication in the diagnostic mammography suite

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 328-337

  Lown, Beth A ^a   Roy, Elizabeth ^a   Gorman, Phyllis ^a   Sasson, J Pierre ^a  

^a MOUNT AUBURN HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Emotional experiences; Information needs; Mammography; Physician patient communication; Professional collaboration; Qualitative research; Radiology training

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EMOTIONALITY; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIOLOGIST; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMMUNICATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 70549099630     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.019     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Rakowski W., Meissner H., Vernon S.W., Breen N., Rimer B., and Clark M.A. Correlates of repeat and recent mammography for women ages 45 to 75 in the 2002 to 2003 health information national trends survey (HINTS 2003). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15 (2006) 2093-2101
2. Tang T.S., Patterson S.K., Moubidoux M.A., and Duan L. Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence. Psycho-Oncology 18 (2009) 727-734
3. Priyanath A., Feinglass J., Dolan N.C., Haviley C., and Venta L.A. Patient satisfaction with the communication of mammographic results before and after the Mammography Quality Standards Reauthorization Act of 1998. Am J Radiol 178 (2002) 451-456
4. Karliner L.S., Kaplan C.P., Juaibe T., Pasick R., and Perez-Stable E.J. Poor patient comprehension of abnormal mammography results. J Gen Intern Med 20 (2004) 432-437
5. Yabroff K.R., Breen N., Vernon S.W., Meissner H.I., Freedman A.N., and Ballard-Barbash R. What factors are associated with diagnostic follow-up after abnormal mammograms? Findings from a U.S. national survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13 (2004) 723-732
6. Poon E.G., Haas J.S., Puopolo A.L., Gandhi T.K., Burdick E., et al. Communication factors in the follow-up of abnormal mammograms. J Gen Intern Med 18 (2004) 316-323
7. American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas (BI-RADS® Atlas) (2003), Reston, VA, American College of Radiology. http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/BIRADSAtlas/BIRADSAtlasexcerptedtext/BIRADSMammographyFourthEdition.aspx Available at: http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/BIRADSAtlas/BIRADSAtlasexcerptedtext/BIRADSMammographyFourthEdition.aspx [accessed July 14, 2009]
8. Brauning M.P., Earp J.A.L., O'Brien S.M., Schell M.H., Denham A.C., et al. Informing patients of diagnostic mammography results: mammographers' opinions. Acad Radiol 7 (2000) 355-440
9. Levin K., Brauening P., O'Malley M., Pisano E., Barrett E., and Earp J. Communicating results of diagnostic mammography: what do patients think?. Acad Radiol 7 (2000) 1069-1076
10. Schreiber M., Leonard M., and Rieniets C. Disclosure of imaging findings to patients directly by radiologists: survey of patients' preferences. Am J Radiol 165 (1995) 467-469
11. Raza S., Rosen M., Chlorny K., Mehta T., Hulka C., and Baum J. Patient expectations and costs of immediate reporting of screening mammography. Am J Radiol 177 (2001) 579-583
12. Graham J., Ramirez A.J., Field S., and Richards A. Job stress and satisfaction among clinical radiologists. Clin Radiol 55 (2000) 182-185
13. Ramirez A., Graham J., Richards M., Cull A., and Gregory W. Mental health of hospital consultants: the effects of stress and satisfaction at work. Lancet 347 (1996) 724-728
14. Sasson J.P., Zand T., and Lown B.A. Communication in the diagnostic mammography suite: implications for practice and training. Acad Radiol 15 (2008) 417-424
15. In: Strauss A., and Corbin J. (Eds). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. secon ed. (1997), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
16. Girgis A., and Sanson-Fisher R.W. Breaking bad news. 1. Current best advice for clinicians. Behav Med 24 (1998) 53-60
17. Braddock III C., Hudak P.L., Feldman J.J., Bereknyai S., Frankel R.M., and Levinson W. Surgery is certainly one good option: quality and time efficiency of informed decision-making in surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 (2008) 1830-1838
18. Braddock C.H., Edwards K.A., Hasenberg N.M., Laidley T.L., and Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. J Am Med Assoc 282 (1999) 2313-2320
19. O'Dwyer H.M., Lyon S.M., Fotheringham T., and Lee M.J. Informed consent for interventional radiology procedures: a survey detailing current European practice. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 26 (2003) 428-433
20. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Diagnostic Radiology, Effective: July 1, 2008. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/downloads/RRC_progReq/420_diagnostic_radiology_07012010.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2009.
21. Rojas M., and Mandelblatt J. Barriers to follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms among low-income minority women. Ethn Health 1 (1996) 221-228
22. Goldman R.E., Sullivan A., Back A.L., Alexander S.C., Matsuyama R.K., and Lee S.J. Patients' reflections on communication in the second-opinion hematology-oncology consultation. Patient Educ Couns 76 (2009) 44-50
23. Veazie P.J., and Cai S. A connection between medication adherence, patient sense of uniqueness, and the personalization of information. Med Hypotheses 68 (2007) 335-342
24. Kiesler D.J., and Auerbach S.M. Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions. Patient Educ Couns 61 (2006) 319-341
25. Lazarus E., Mainiero M.B., Schepps B., Koelliker S.L., and Livingston L.S. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology 239 (2006) 385-391
26. Eberl M.M., Fox C.H., Edge S.B., Carter C.A., and Mahoney M.C. BI-RADS classification for management of abnormal mammograms. J Am Board Fam Med 19 (2006) 161-164
27. Elwyn G., Edwards A., Hood K., Robling M., Atwell C., et al. Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. Fam Pract 21 (2004) 337-346
28. Beam C.A., Conant E.F., and Sickles E.A. Factors affecting radiologist inconsistency in screening mammography. Acad Radiol 9 (2002) 531-540
29. Smith-Bindman R., Chu P., Miglioretti D.L., et al. Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy. J Natl Cancer Inst 97 (2005) 358-367
30. Carney P.A., Yi J.P., Abraham L.A., Miglioretti D.L., Aiello E.J., et al. Reactions to uncertainty and the accuracy of diagnostic mammography. J Gen Intern Med 22 (2007) 234-241
31. Brewer N.L., Salz T., and Lillie S.E. Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Ann Intern Med 146 (2007) 502-510
32. Ptacek J.T., and Eberhardt T. Breaking bad news: a review of the literature. J Am Med Assoc 276 (1996) 496-502
33. Orlander J.D., Fincke B.G., Hermanns D., and Johnson G.A. Medical residents' first clearly remembered experiences of giving bad news. J Gen Intern Med 17 (2002) 825-840
34. Dosanjh S., Barnes J., and Bhandari M. Barriers to breaking bad news among medical and surgical residents. Med Educ 35 (2001) 197-205
35. Hutul O.A., Carpenter R.O., Tarpley J.L., and Lomis K.D. Missed opportunities: a descriptive assessment of teaching and attitudes regarding communication skills in a surgical residency. Curr Surg 63 (2006) 401-409
36. Roter D.L., Hall J.A., and Aoki Y. Physician gender effects in medical communication. A meta-analytic review. J Am Med Assoc 288 (2002) 756-764
37. Lewis R.S., Sunshine J.H., and Bhargavan M. A portrait of breast imaging specialists and of the interpretation of mammography in the United States. Am J Radiol 187 (2006) W456-W468
38. Press R., Carrasquillo O., Sciacca R.R., and Giardina E.G. Racial/ethnic disparities in time to follow-up after an abnormal mammogram. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 17 (2008) 923-930
39. Jones B.A., Dailey A., Calvocoressi L., Reams K., Kasl S.V., Lee C., et al. Inadequate follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms: findings from the race differences in screening mammography process study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 16 (2005) 809-821
40. Jones B.A., Reams K., Calvocoressi L., Dailey A., Kasl S.V., and Liston N.M. Adequacy of communicating results from screening mammograms to African American and White women. Am J Public Health 97 (2007) 531-538
41. Rao J.K., Anderson L.A., Inui T.S., and Frankel R.M. Communication interventions make a difference in conversations between physicians and patients. A systematic review of the evidence. Med Care 45 (2007) 340-349
42. Lewin Sa, Skea ZC, Entwistle V, Zwarenstein M, Dick. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD003267. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD003267.
43. Griffin S.J., Kinmonth A., Veltman M.W.M., Gillard S., Grant J., and Stewart M. Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials. Ann Fam Med 2 (2004) 595-598
44. Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/outcome. Accessed July 15, 2009.