Achieving involvement: Process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice

Family Practice

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 337-346

  Elwyn, G ^a   Edwards, Adrian ^a   Hood, K ^b   Robling, M ^b   Atwell, C ^b   Russell, Ian ^c   Wensing, M ^d   Grol, R ^d  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Primary care; Randomized trial; Risk communication; Shared decision making

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPETENCE; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MENOPAUSAL SYNDROME; MENORRHAGIA; OBSERVATION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCEPTION; POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION; PROSTATISM; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RURAL AREA; SCORING SYSTEM; SIMULATION; SKILL; STAFF TRAINING; STANDARDIZATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TAPE RECORDER; UNITED KINGDOM; URBAN AREA; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COMMUNICATION; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SIMULATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; RISK; TAPE RECORDING;

EID: 4143090483     PISSN: 02632136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmh401     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med 1999;49:651-661.
2. Elwyn G, Charles C. Shared decision making: inevitable or impossible? In Edwards A, Elwyn G, eds. Evidence Based Patient Choice. Oxford: Oxford Universify Press; 2001, 118-143.
3. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 1997;44:681-692.
4. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: defining the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract 2000; 50:892-899.
5. Towle A, Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. Br Med J 1999;319: 766-771.
6. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M et al. Fleeting glimpses: measuring shared decision making in primary care using the OPTION instrument. Qual Safety Health Care 12:93-99.
7. McKinstry B. Do patients wish to be involved in decision making in the consultation? A cross sectional survey with video vignettes. Br Med J 2000;321:867-871.
8. Stevenson FA, Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley CP. Doctor-patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making. Soc Sci Med 2000;50:829-840.
9. Auerbach SM. Should patients have control over their own health care?: empirical evidence and research issues. Ann Behav Med 2000;22:246-259.
10. Gwyn R, Elwyn G. When is a shared decision not (quite) a shared decision? Negotiating preferences in a general practice encounter. Soc Sci Med 1999;49:437-447.
11. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Gwyn R, Grol R. Towards a feasible model for shared decision-making: a focus group study with general practice registrars. Br Med J 1999;319:753-757.
12. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P. Shared decision making: the neglected second half of the consultation. Br J Gen Pract 1999; 49: 477-482.
13. Edwards AGK, Hood K, Matthews EJ et al. The effectiveness of one-to-one risk communication interventions in health care: a systematic review. Med Decision Making 2000;20:290-297.
14. Bekker H, Thornton JG, Airey CM et al. Informed decision making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review. Health Technol Assess 1999;3.
15. Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I et al. Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. Br Med J 2001;323: 908-911.
16. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Smith C, Williams S, Thornton H. Consumers' views of quality in the consultation and their relevance to 'shared decision making' approaches. Health Expectations 2001; 4: 151-162.
17. Hulsman RL, Ros WJ, Winnubst JA, Bensing JM. Teaching clinically experienced physicians communication skills. A review of evaluation studies. Med Educ 1999;33:655-658.
18. Griffin S, Gillard S, Veltman M, Grant J, Stewart M, Kinmonth AL. A systematic review of trials of interventions to improve the interactions between patients and practitioners. The 29th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Association of University Departments of General Practice. Bournemouth: CBC Oxford Ltd on behalf of the AUDGP; 2000.
19. Lewin SA, Skea ZC, Entwistle V, Zwarenstein M, Dick J. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. The Cochrane Library. Oxford: Update Software, 2002.
20. Stewart M. Effective physician patient communication and health outcomes. Can Med Assoc J 1995; 152: 1423-1433.
21. Schneider CE. The Practice of Autonomy: Patients, Doctors, and Medical Decisions. New York: Oxford University Press: 1998.
22. Public Health Department Gwent Health Authority. Townsend Indices of Socio-economic Status for Post Code Enumeration Districts in Gwenth, South Wales. Newport: Public Health Department Gwent Health Authority: 1998.
23. Weijer C, Shapiro S, Glass K, Enkin M. Clinical equipoise and not the uncertainty principle is the moral underpinning of the randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 2000;321:756-758.
24. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Atwell C et al. Patient-based outcome results from a cluster randomized controlled trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice: Fam Practice 2004;21:345-352.
25. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Gwyn R. General practice registrar responses to the use of different risk communication tools: problems and opportunities. Br Med J 1999;319: 749-752.
26. Schwartz D, Lellouch J. Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutic trials. J Chron Dis 1967;20:637-648.
27. Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan R. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 1999;27:S178-S189.
28. Goldstein H, Rasbash J, Plewis I et al. A User's Guide to MLwiN. London: Institute of Education: 1998.
29. MLwiN [program]. London: Institute of Education, University of London http://www.ioe.ac.uk/multilevel/index.html; 2001.
30. Moore H, Summerbell C, Vail A, Greenwood D, Adamson A. The design features and practicalities of conducting a pragmatic cluster randomised trial of obesity management in primary care. Stat Med 2001;20:331-340.
31. Edwards A, Elwyn GJ. How should 'effectiveness' of risk communication to aid patients' decisions be judged? A review of the literature. Med Decision Making 2000; 19: 428-434.
32. Hargie ODW, editor. The Handbook of Communication Skills. London: Routledge; 1997.
33. Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, McWinney IR, McWilliam CL, Freeman TR. Patient Centred Medicine: Transforming the Clinical Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995.
34. Guadagnoli E, Ward P. Patient participation in decision-making. Social Science & Medicine 1998;47: 329-339.
35. Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision making. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 1997;2:112-121.
36. Boyatzis RE. The competent manager. A model for effective performance. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1982.
37. Nuffield Institute for Health UoL. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Effective Health Care Bulletin 1995;2(2):1-16.
38. Coulter A, Kelland J, Peto V, Rees M. Treating menorrhagia in primary care. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 1999;11:456-471.
39. Grady D, Rubin SM, Pettiti DB, Fox CS, Black D, Ettinger B et al. Hormone therapy to prevent disease and prolong life in postmenopausal women. Annals of Internal Medicine 1992;117: 1016-1037.
40. Benavente O, Hart R, Koudstaal P, Laupacis A, McBride R. Antiplatelet therapy for preventing stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and no previous history of stroke or transient ischemic attacks. Update Sotware: Cochrane Library 1999 (Issue 2).
41. Benavente Q, Hart R, Koudstaal P, Laupacis A, McBride R. Oral anticoagulants for preventing stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and no previous history of stroke or transient ischemic attacks. Update Software: Cochrane Library 1999 (Issue 2).
42. Edwards A, Matthews E, Pill KM, Bloor M. Communication about risk: diversity among primary care professionals. Family Practice 1998;15:296-300.
43. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Smith C. Consumers' views of quality: identifying the consultation outcomes of importance to consumers, and their relevance to 'shared decision-making' approaches. Health Expectations 2001; 4: 151-161.