Patient expectations and costs of immediate reporting of screening mammography: Talk isn't cheap

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 177, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 579-583

  Raza, S ^a   Rosen, M P ^a   Chorny, K ^a   Mehta, T S ^a   Hulka, C A ^a   Baum, J K ^a  

^a BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL FEE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0034864316     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.177.3.1770579     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Patient expectations of radiology in non-interactive encounters
2. Patient satisfaction with screening mammography: Online vs off-line interpretation
3. Communication of mammography results to women by radiologists: Attitudes of referring health care providers
4. Women's attitudes about receiving mammographic results directly from radiologists
5. When the patient asks for the results of her mammogram, how should the radiologist reply?
6. Telling the patient her mammogram results
7. Telling the patient her mammogram results
8. Patients' opinion of mammography screening services: Immediate results versus delayed results due to interpretation by two observers
9. Physicians' opinions on the delivery of mammographic screening services: Immediate interpretation versus double reading
10. False-positive screening mammograms: Effect of immediate versus later work-up on patient stress