Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence

Psycho-Oncology

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 727-734

  Tang, Tricia S ^a   Patterson, Stephanie K ^b   Roubidoux, Marilyn A ^b   Duan, Linping ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer; Mammography experience; Oncology; Repeat mammography; Screening adherence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO ILLNESS; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PREDICTION;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REMINDER SYSTEMS;

EID: 67749142162     PISSN: 10579249     EISSN: 10991611     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pon.1463     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:43-66.
2. Michigan Public Health Institute (in support of the Michigan Cancer Consortium Initiative). The Cancer Burden in Michigan: Selected Statistics. Okemos, MI, December 2006. Available at: www.michigancancer.org/PDFs/MCCReports/CancerBurden-Dec2006/ Cancer-BurdenInMichigan-Dec06-AllSections.pdf. Accessed on: November 20, 2007.
3. Duffy SW, Tabar L, Chen H et al. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish Counties. Cancer 2002;95:458-469.
4. Tabar L, Yen M, Vitak B, Chen HT, Smith RA, Duffy S. Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening. Lancet 2003; 361: 1405-1410.
5. Breast Screening Frequency Trial Group. The frequency of breast cancer screening: results from the UKCCCR randomized trial. United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38: 1458-1464.
6. Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53:138-140.
7. Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML et al. Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93: 1676-1677
8. National Center for Health Statistics: Health, United States, 2002: With Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 017-022-01531, 2002.
9. Blackman DK, Bennett EM, Miller DS. Trends in self-reported use of mammograms (1989-1997) and Papanicolaou tests (1991-1997) - behavioral risk factor surveillance system. MMWR 1999;48:1-22.
10. Engelman KK, Ellerbeck EF, Mayo MS, Markello SJ, Ahluvalia JS. Mammography facility characteristics and repeat mammography use among Medicare beneficiaries. Prev Med 2004;39:491-497.
11. Bobo JK, Shapiro JA, Schulman J, Wolters CL. On-schedule mammography rescreening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:620-630.
12. Quinley J, Mahotiere T, Messina CR, Lee T, Mikail C. Mammography-facility-based patient reminders and repeat mammograms for Medicare in New York State. Prev Med 2004;38:20-27.
13. Barr J, Franks A, Lee N, Herther F, Schachter M. Factors associated with continued participation in mammography screening. Prev Med 2001; 33:661-667.
14. Clark MA, Rakowski W, Bonacore LB. Repeat mammography: prevalence estimates and considerations for assessment. Ann Behav Med 2003; 26:201-211.
15. Phillips KA, Kerlikowske K, Baker LC, Chang SW, Brown ML. Factors associated with women's adherence to mammography screening guidelines. Health Serv Res 1998;33:29-53.
16. Yood MU, McCarthy BD, Lee NC, Jacobsen G, Johnson CC. Patterns and characteristics of repeat mammography among women 50 years and older. Cancer Epidmiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:595-599.
17. Calvocoressi L, Kasl SV, Lee CH, Stolar M, Claus EB, Jones BA. A prospective study of perceived susceptibility to breast cancer and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines in African American and White Women Ages 40-79. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004; 13:2096-2105.
18. Gross CP, Filardo G, Singh HS, Freedman AN, Farrell MH. The relation between projected breast cancer risk, perceived cancer risk, and mammography use. Results from the National Health Interview Survey. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:158-164.
19. Elwood M, McNoe B, Smith T, Bandaranayake M, Doyle T. Once is enough - why some women do not continue to participate in a breast cancer screening programme. N Z Med J 1998;111:180-183.
20. Drossaert CHC, Boer H, Seydel ER. Does mammographic screening and a negative result affect attitudes towards future screening? J Med Screen 2001;8:204-209.
21. Kashikar-Zuck S, Keefe FJ, Kornguth P, Beaupre P, Holzberg A, Delong D. Pain coping and the pain experience during mamography: a preliminary study. Pain 1997;73:165-172.
22. Keefe FJ, Hauck ER, Egert J, Rimer B, Kornguth P. Mammography pain and discomfort: a cognitive-behavioral perspective. Pain 1994; 56:247-260.
23. Kornguth PJ, Keefe FJ, Conaway MR. Pain during mammography: characteristics and relationship to demographic and medical variables. Pain 1996;66: 187-194.
24. Marshall G. A comparative study of re-attenders and non-re-attenders for second triennial National Breast Screening Programme appointments. J Public Health Med (Oxf) 1994;16:79-86.
25. Orton M, Fitzpatrick R, Fuller A, Mant D, Mlynek C, Thorogood M. Factors a.ecting women's response to an invitation to attend for a seond breast cancer screening examination. Br J Gen Pract 1991; 41:320-323.
26. Peipins LA, Shapiro JA, Bobo JK, Berkowitz Z. Impact of women's experiences during mammography on adherence to rescreening (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2006;17:439-447.
27. Somkin CP, McPhee SJ, Nguyen T et al. The effect of access and satisfaction on regular mammogram and Papanicolaou test screening in a multiethnic population. Med Care 2004;42:914-926.
28. Loeken K, Steine S, Sandvik L, Laerum, E. A new instrument to measure patient satisfaction with mammography: validity, reliability, and discriminatory power. Med Care 1997;35:731-741.
29. Loeken K, Steine S, Sandvik L, Laerum E, Finset A. A new measure of patient satisfaction with mammography. Validation by factor analytic technique. Fam Pract 1996;13:67-74.
30. Rakowski W, Breen N, Meissner H et al. Prevalence and correlates of repeat mammography among women aged 55-79 in the Year 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Prev Med 2004;39:1-10.
31. Mayer JA, Lewis EC, Slymen DJ et al. Patient reminder letters to promote annual mammograms: a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 2000;31:315-322.
32. Rakowski W, Lipkus IM, Clark MA et al. Reminder letter, tailored stepped-care, and self-choice comparison for repeat mammography. Am J Prev Med 2003;25: 308-314.