Orthographic and phonological effects in the pictureword interference paradigm: Evidence from a logographic language

Applied Psycholinguistics

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 637-658

  Bi, Yanchao ^a   Xu, Yaoda ^b   Caramazza, Alfonso ^b,c  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450257715     PISSN: 01427164     EISSN: 14691817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0142716409990051     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Bi, Y., Han, Z., Weekes, B. S., & Shu, H. (2007). The interaction between the semantic and the nonsemantic routes of reading: Evidence from Chinese. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2660-2673.
2. Bock, K., & Levelt,W. J. M. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press.
3. Bub, D., Cancelliere, A., & Kertesz, A. (1985). Whole-word and analytic translation of spelling-tosound in a non-semantic reader. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia. London: Erlbaum.
4. Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177-208.
5. Caramazza, A., Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Bi, Y. (2001). The specific-word frequency effect: Implications for the representation of homophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1430-1450.
6. Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1997). The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: Evidence from the "tip-of-the-tongue" phenomenon. Cognition, 64, 309-343.
7. Chen, H.-C., Cheung, S. L., &Flores d'Arcais, G. B. (1995). Orthographic and phonological activation in recognizing Chinese characters. Psychological Research, 58, 144-153.
8. Cheng, C. M.,&Shih, S. I. (1998). The nature of lexical access in Chinese: Evidence from experiments on visual and phonological priming in lexical judgement. In I. M. Liu, H. C. Chen, & M.-J. Chen (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of the Chinese language (Vol. 1, pp. 1-14). Hong Kong: Asian Research Service.
9. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing. London: Academic Press.
10. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
11. Costa, A., & Caramazza, A. (2002). The production of noun phrases in English and Spanish: Implications for the scope of phonological encoding in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 178-198
12. Costa, A., Mahon, B., Savova, V., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Level of categorization effect: A novel effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 205-233. (Pubitemid 36553333)
13. Damian, M. F., & Martin, R. C. (1999). Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 345-361.
14. DeFrancis, J. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
15. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
16. Feng, G., Miller, K., Shu, H., & Zhang, H. (2001). Rowed to recovery: The use of phonological and orthographic information in reading Chinese and English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1079-1100.
17. Finkbeiner, M., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Now you see it, now you don't: On turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Stroop-like task. Cortex, 42, 790-796.
18. Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. W. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 257-287). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
19. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: AWindows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 116-124.
20. Garrett, M. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In Language production: Vol.1. Speech and talk. New York: Academic Press.
21. Glaser, W. R., & Dungelhoff, F. J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 640-654.
22. Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects on Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13-42.
23. Harley, T. A. (1999). Will one stage and no feedback suffice in lexicalization? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 45.
24. Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Converging evidence for trhe interation of semantic and sublexical phonological information in accessing lexical prepresentations for spoken output. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 187-227.
25. Hue, C.-W. (1992). Recognition processes in character naming. In H.-C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 93-107). Amsterdam: North-Holland
26. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Institute of Language Teaching and Research. (1986). Xiandai Hanyu Pinlv Cidian (Modern Chinese frequency dictionary). Beijing: Beijing Language Institute Press.
27. Janssen, N., Schirm, W., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: Evidence for the response selection hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 249-256.
28. Law, S. P., & Wong, R. (2005). A model-driven treatment of a Cantonese-speaking dyslexic patient with impairment to the semantic and nonsemantic pathways. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 95-110.
29. Lee, C. Y., Tsai, J. L., Kuo,W. J., Yeh, T. C.,Wu, Y. T., Ho, L. T., et al. (2004). Neuronal correlates of consistency and frequency effects on Chinese character naming: An event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage, 23, 1235-1245.
30. Lee, C. Y., Tsai, J. L., Su, S. C., Tzeng, O., & Hung, D. (2005). Consistency, regularity and frequency effects in naming Chinese characters. Language and Linguistics, 6, 175-197.
31. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
33. Li, D. (1993). A study of Chinese characters. Beijing: Peking University Press.
34. Li, G. Y., & Liu, R. S. (1988). Hanzi Xinxi Zidian (Chinese character information dictionary). Beijing: Science Press.
35. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994a). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: I. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107-128.
36. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994b). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: I. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 331-353.
37. Lupker, S. J. (1982). The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture-word interference. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 349-367.
38. Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 503-535.
39. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallellism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102.
40. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: psycholinguistic and computational perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1991). Integration versus interactive activation: The joint influence of stimulus and context in perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 558-614.
42. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
43. Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1146-1160.
44. Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (2003). When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 228-252.
45. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
46. Peng, D., Yang, H., & Chen, Y. (1994). Consistency and phonetic independency effects in naming task of Chinese phonograms. In Q. C. Jing, H. C. Zhang, & D. L. Peng (Eds.), Information processing of Chinese language. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Publishing.
47. Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (1998). The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 101-118.
48. Perfetti, C. A., & Zhang, S. (1995). Very early phonological activation in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 24-33.
49. Posnansky, C. J., & Rayner, K. (1978). Visual vs. phonemic contributions to the importance of the initial letter in word identification. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 188-190.
50. Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460-499.
51. Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107-142.
52. Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249-284. (Pubitemid 127437172)
53. Roelofs, A., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1996). Interaction between semantic and orthographic factors in conceptually driven naming: Comment on Starreveld and La Heij (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 246-251.
54. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86-102.
55. Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19, 1-30
56. Seidenberg, M. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1979). Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 546-554.
57. Shen, D., & Forster, K. I. (1999). Masked phonological priming in reading Chinese words depends on the task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 429-459.
58. Shu, H., & Zhang, H. (1987). The phonological processing of Chinese characters in skilled readers. Acta Psychologia Sinica, 3, 297-304.
59. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
60. Starreveld, P. A. (2000). On the interpretation of onsets of auditory context effects in word production. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 497-525.
61. Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 686-698.
62. Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1996). The locus of orthographic-phonological facilitation: Reply to Roelofs, Meyer, and Levelt (1996). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 252-255.
63. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
64. Tan, L. H., Hoosain, R., & Peng, D.-L. (1995). Role of early presemantic phonological code in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 43-54.
65. Wang, W. S.-Y. (1973). The Chinese language. Scientific American, 228, 50-60.
66. Weekes, B. S., & Chen, H. (1999). Surface dyslexia in Chinese. Neurocase, 5, 101-112.
67. Weekes, B. S., Davies, R. A., & Chen, M.-J.,(2002). Picture-word interference effects on naming in Chinese. In H. S. R. Kao, C. K. Leong, & D.-G. Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 101-127). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
68. Wong, K. F. E., & Chen, H.-C. (1999). Orthographic and phonological processing in reading Chinese text: Evidence from eye fixations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 461-480.
69. Yin, B., & Rohsenow, J. S. (1994). Modern Chinese characters. Beijing: Sinolingua.
70. Yin, W., & Butterworth, B. (1992). Deep and surface dyslexia in Chinese. In H. C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 349-366). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
71. Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson,W. (1999a). Phonology, orthography, and semantic activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 579-606.
72. Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1999b). Sublexical processing in reading Chinese. In J. Wang, A. Inhoff, & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 37-63). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
73. Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M., & Shu, H. (1999). Morphology, orthography, and phonology in reading Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 525-565.
74. Zhou, X., Shu, H., Bi,Y.,&Shi,D. (1999). Is there phonologically mediated access to lexical semantics in reading Chinese? In J. Wang, A. Inhoff, & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 135-171). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
75. Zhou, X., Zhuang, J., Wu, J., & Yang, D. (2003). Phonological, orthographic and semantic activation in the speech production of Chinese. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 6, 712-718.
76. Zhu, X. (1988). Analysis of cueing function of phonetic components in modern Chinese. In X. Yuan (Ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium on the Chinese Language and Characters (pp. 85-99). Beijing: Guang Ming Daily Press.