Towards measurable bounds on entanglement measures

Quantum Information Processing

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 493-521

  Augusiak, Remigiusz ^a   Lewenstein, MacIej ^a  

^a ICFO INSTITUT DE CIENCIES FOTONIQUES   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bounds on entanglement measures; Concurrence; Generalized robustness of entanglement; Measurability of entanglement

Indexed keywords

ENTANGLEMENT MEASURE; LOWER BOUNDS; MEAN VALUES; QUANTUM STATE; UPPER BOUND;

CONTROL THEORY; OPTICAL VARIABLES CONTROL;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 70450250080     PISSN: 15700755     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11128-009-0136-7     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. R. Horodecki P. Horodecki M. Horodecki K. Horodecki 2009 Quantum entanglement Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 865 942 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXnsFCgur0%3D 2515619 2009RvMP...81..865H
2. P. Zoller, et al. 2005 Quantum information processing and communication-strategic report on current status, visions and goals for research in Europe Eur. Phys. J. D 36 203 228 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtV2kt7%2FL 2005EPJD...36..203Z
3. O. Gühne G. Tóth 2009 Entanglement detection Phys. Rep. 474 1 75 2523078 2009PhR...474....1G
4. A.G. White J.R. Mitchell O. Nairz P.G. Kwiat 1998 Interaction-free imaging Phys. Rev. A 58 605 613 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXktlOrs7c%3D 1998PhRvA..58..605W
5. H. Häffner W. Hänsel C.F. Roos J. Benhelm D. Chek-al-kar M. Chwalla T. Korber U.D. Rapol M. Riebe P.O. Schmidt C. Becher O. Gühne W. Dür R. Blatt 2005 Scalable multiparticle entanglement of trapper ions Nature 438 643 646 16319886 2005Natur.438..643H
6. J.K. Korbicz O. Gühne M. Lewenstein H. Häffner C.F. Roos R. Blatt 2006 Generalized spin-squeezing inequalities in N-qubit systems: theory and experiment Phys. Rev. A 74 052319/1 052319/13 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD2sXhs1Khtg%3D%3D 2006PhRvA..74e2319K
7. G. Jaeger M.A. Horne A. Shimony 1993 Complementarity of one-particle and two-particle interference Phys. Rev. A 48 1023 1027 9909701 1993PhRvA..48.1023J
8. H. Weinfurter M. Zukowski 2001 Four-photon entanglement from down-conversion Phys. Rev. A 64 010102/1 010102/4 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXksFygt7c%3D 2001PhRvA..64a0102W
9. Bell J.S.: Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
10. J.F. Clauser M.A. Horne A. Shimony R.A. Holt 1969 Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 880 884 1969PhRvL..23..880C
11. R.F. Werner 1989 Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model Phys. Rev. A 40 4277 4281 9902666 1989PhRvA..40.4277W
12. J. Barrett 2002 Nonsequential positive-operator-valued measurements on entangled mixed states do not always violate a Bell inequality Phys. Rev. A 65 042302/1 042302/4 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XivVWmsbs%3D 1897984 2002PhRvA..65d2302B
13. G. Tóth A. Acín 2006 Genuine tripartite entangled states with a local hidden-variable model Phys. Rev. A 74 030306(R)/1 030306(R)/4 2006PhRvA..74c0306T
14. M.L. Almeida S. Pironio J. Barrett G. Tóth A. Acín 2007 Robustness of the nonlocality of entangled quantum states Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 040403/1 040403/4 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXotlegtL8%3D 2007PhRvL..99d0403A
15. R.F. Werner M. Wolf 2001 Bell inequalities and entanglement Quant. Inf. Comp. 1 1 25 05320164 1907485
16. M. Horodecki P. Horodecki R. Horodecki 1996 Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient condition Phys. Lett. A 223 1 8 1037.81501 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XmsFans70%3D 1421501 1996PhLA..223....1H
17. B.M. Terhal 2000 Bell inequalities and separability criterion Phys. Lett. A 271 319 326 1115.81320 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXksFelt7w%3D 1773219 2000PhLA..271..319T
18. O. Gühne P. Hyllus D. Bru A. Ekert M. Lewenstein C. Macchiavello A. Sanpera 2002 Detection of entanglement with few local measurements Phys. Rev. A 66 062305/1 062305/5 2002PhRvA..66f2305G
19. M. Barbieri F. De Martini G. Di Nepi P. Mataloni G.M. D'Ariano C. Macchiavello 2003 Detection of entanglement with polarized photons: experimental realization of an entanglement witness Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 227901/1 227901/4 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXptlGgs7o%3D 2003PhRvL..91v7901B
20. M. Bourennane M. Eibl C. Kurtsiefer S. Gaertner H. Weinfurter O. Gühne P. Hyllus D. Bru M. Lewenstein A. Sanpera 2004 Experimental detection of multipartite entanglement using witness operators Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 087902/1 087902/4 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhslejtbc%3D 2004PhRvL..92h7902B
21. J.M. Sancho S.F. Huelga 2000 Measuring the entanglement of bipartite pure states Phys. Rev. A 61 042303/1 042303/7 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXhvF2jsro%3D 1772334 2000PhRvA..61d2303S
22. A. Acín R. Tarrach G. Vidal 2000 Optimal estimation of two-qubit pure-state entanglement Phys. Rev. A 61 062307/1 062307/8 2000PhRvA..61f2307A
23. S.P. Walborn P.H. Souto Ribeiro L. Davidovich F. Mintert A. Buchleitner 2006 Experimental determination of entanglement with a single measurement Nature 440 1022 1024 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xjs1agt78%3D 16625190 2006Natur.440.1022W
24. P. Horodecki 2003 Measuring quantum entanglement without prior state reconstruction Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 167901/1 167901/4 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD3sXjtlSgtL8%3D 2003PhRvL..90p7901H
25. F. Mintert A. Buchleitner 2007 Observable entanglement measure for mixed quantum states Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 140505/1 140505/4 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD2sXjvF2lsbo%3D 2308840 2007PhRvL..98n0505M
26. R. Augusiak M. Demianowicz P. Horodecki 2008 Universal observable detecting all two-qubit entanglement and determinant-based separability tests Phys. Rev. A 77 030301(R)/1 030301(R)/4 2008PhRvA..77c0301A
27. P. Horodecki 2003 From limits of quantum operations to multicopy entanglement witnesses and state-spectrum estimation Phys. Rev. A 68 052101/1 052101/6 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXps1Wkt7g%3D 2003PhRvA..68e2101H
28. P. Horodecki A. Ekert 2002 Method for direct detection of quantum entanglement Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 127902/1 127902/4 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD38XotVKltL0%3D 1928672 2002PhRvL..89l7902H
29. J.K. Korbicz, et al. 2008 Structural approximations to positive maps and entanglement-breaking channels Phys. Rev. A 78 062105/1 062105/17 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXit1Oguw%3D%3D 2008PhRvA..78f2105K
30. O. Gühne N. Lütkenhaus 2006 Nonlinear entanglement witnesses Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 170502/1 170502/4
31. O. Gühne 2004 Characterizing entanglement via uncertainty relations Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 117903/1 117903/4 2004PhRvL..92k7903G
32. G. Tóth C. Knapp O. Gühne H.J. Briegel 2007 Optimal spin squeezing inequalities detect bound entanglement in spin models Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 250405/1 250405/4 2007PhRvL..99y0405T
33. J.K. Korbicz J.I. Cirac M. Lewenstein 2005 Spin squeezing inequalities and N Qubit states Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 120502/1 120502/4 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD2MXhtVWqu7nP 2005PhRvL..95l0502K
34. J.K. Korbicz J.I. Cirac M. Lewenstein 2005 Spin squeezing inequalities and N Qubit states Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 259901/1 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtlCgu77O 2005PhRvL..95y9901K
35. H.F. Hofmann S. Takeuchi 2003 Violation of local uncertainty relations as a signature of entanglement Phys. Rev. A 68 032103/1 032103/6 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXnvVKjsLY%3D 2032300 2003PhRvA..68c2103H
36. O. Gühne M. Lewenstein 2004 Entropic uncertainty relations and entanglement Phys. Rev. A 70 022316/1 022316/8 2004PhRvA..70b2316G
37. J.I. de Vicente J. Sánchez-Ruiz 2005 Separability conditions from the Landau-Pollack uncertainty relations Phys. Rev. A 71 052325/1 052325/8 2005PhRvA..71e2325D
38. A. Acín D. Bru M. Lewenstein A. Sanpera 2001 Classification of mixed three-qubit states Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 040401/1 040401/4 2001PhRvL..87d0401A
39. O. Gühne P. Hyllus D. Bruss A. Ekert M. Lewenstein C. Macchiavello A. Sanpera 2003 Experimental detection of entanglement via witness operators and local measurement J. Mod. Opt. 50 1079 1102 1055.81516 2003JMOp...50.1079G
40. M. Horodecki 2001 Entanglement measures Quant. Inf. Comp. 1 3 26 05320159 1910008
41. S. Virmani M.B. Plenio 2007 An introduction to entanglement measures Quant. Inf. Comp. 7 1 51 1152.81798 2302673
42. F. Mintert 2007 Entanglement measures as physical observables Appl. Phys. B 89 493 497 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtl2hur%2FF 2007ApPhB..89..493M
43. H.-P. Breuer 2006 Separability criteria and bounds for entanglement measure J. Phys. A 39 11847 11860 1100.81006 2275886 2006JPhA...3911847B
44. F. Mintert 2007 Concurrence via entanglement witness Phys. Rev. A 75 052302/1 052302/4 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXmtlCrsLo%3D 2007PhRvA..75e2302M
45. L. Aolita A. Buchleitner F. Mintert 2008 Scalable method to estimate experimentally the entanglement of multipartite systems Phys. Rev. A 78 022308/1 022308/4 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtVKjsLjM 2008PhRvA..78b2308A
46. C.-J. Zhang Y.-X. Gong Y.-S. Zhang G.-C. Guo 2008 Observable estimation of entanglement for arbitrary finite-dimensional mixed states Phys. Rev. A 78 042308/1 042308/5 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtlagsb3L 2008PhRvA..78d2308Z
47. F. Bovino G. Castagnoli A. Ekert P. Horodecki C. Moura Alves A.V. Sergienko 2005 Direct measurement of nonlinear properties of bipartite quantum states Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 240407/1 240407/4 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtlSnsbvO 2185697 2005PhRvL..95x0407B
48. C. Schmid N. Kiesel W. Wieczorek H. Weinfurter F. Mintert A. Buchleitner 2008 Experimental direct observation of mixed state entanglement Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 260505 19437629 2008PhRvL.101z0505S
49. C. Moura Alves D. Jaksch 2004 Multipartite entanglement detection in bosons Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 110501/1 110501/4 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXnsVCksbc%3D 2004PhRvL..93k0501M
50. S.J. van Enk N. Lütkenhaus H.J. Kimble 2007 Experimental procedures for entanglement verification Phys. Rev. A 75 052318/1 052318/14 2007PhRvA..75e2318V
51. S.J. van Enk 2009 Direct measurements of entanglement and permutation symmetry Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 190503/1 190503/4
52. F.S.G.L. Brandão 2005 Quantifying entanglement with witness operator Phys. Rev. A 72 022310/1 022310/15 2005PhRvA..72b2310B
53. F.S.G.L. Brandão R.O. Vianna 2006 Witnessed entanglement Int. J. Quant. Inf. 4 331 340 1127.81005
54. K.M.R. Audenaert M.B. Plenio 2006 When are correlations quantum?-verification and quantification of entanglement by simple measurements New J. Phys. 8 266/1 266/20 2006NJPh....8..266A
55. O. Gühne M. Reimpell R.F. Werner 2007 Estimating entanglement measures in experiments Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 110502/1 110502/4
56. O. Gühne M. Reimpell R.F. Werner 2008 Lower bounds on entanglement measures from incomplete information Phys. Rev. A 77 052317/1 052317/8 2008PhRvA..77e2317G
57. J. Eisert F.G.S.L. Brandão K.M.R. Audenaert 2007 Quantitative entanglement witnesses New. J. Phys. 9 46/1 46/19 2007NJPh....9...46E
58. Wunderlich, H., Plenio, M.B.: Quantitative verification of entanglement and fidelities from incomplete measurement data. arXiv:0902.1848 (2009)
59. A. Uhlmann 1976 The "transition probability" in the state space of a-algebra Rep. Math. Phys. 9 273 279 0355.46040 423089 1976RpMP....9..273U
60. R. Jozsa 1994 Fidelity for mixed quantum states J. Mod. Opt. 41 2315 2323 0941.81508 1312945 1994JMOp...41.2315J
61. J.A. Miszczak Z. Puchała P. Horodecki A. Uhlmann K. Zyczkowski 2009 Sub-and super-fidelity as bounds for quantum fidelity Quant. Inf. Comp. 9 103 130 1160.81009
62. Z. Ma D.-L. Deng F.-L. Zhang J.-L. Chen 2009 Bounds of concurrence and their relation with fidelity and frontier states Phys. Lett. A 373 1616 1620 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXktV2rsL0%3D 2009PhLA..373.1616M
63. M. Sinocka M. Kuś K. Zyczkowski 2002 Manifolds of equal entanglement for composite quantum systems Acta Phys. Pol. B 33 2081 2095 2002AcPPB..33.2081S
64. H. Fan K. Matsumoto H. Imai 2003 Quantify entanglement by concurrence hierarchy J. Phys. A 36 4151 4158 1068.81011 1984540 2003JPhA...36.4151F
65. G. Gour 2005 Family of concurrence monotones and its applications Phys. Rev. A 71 012318/1 012318/8 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXitVOisbY%3D 2188810 2005PhRvA..71a2318G
66. P. Rungta V. Bužek C.M. Caves M. Hillery G.J. Milburn 2001 Universal state inversion and concurrence in arbitrary dimensions Phys. Rev. A 64 042315/1 042315/13 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXntVWntLw%3D 2001PhRvA..64d2315R
67. S. Hill W.K. Wootters 1997 Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 5022 5025 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXkt1arsrg%3D 1997PhRvL..78.5022H
68. A.R.R. Carvalho F. Mintert A. Buchleitner 2004 Decoherence and multipartite entanglement Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 230501/1 230501/4 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVGjurjI 2004PhRvL..93w0501C
69. A. Borras A.P. Majtey A.R. Plastino M. Casas A. Plastino 2009 Typical features of the Mintert-Buchleitner lower bound for concurrence Phys. Rev. A 79 022112/1 0222112/6 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXis1Gqt7g%3D 2009PhRvA..79b2112B
70. R. Horodecki P. Horodecki M. Horodecki 1996 Quantum α-entropy inequalities: independent condition for local realism? Phys. Lett. A 210 377 381 1073.81517 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XnvFChsA%3D%3D 1371110 1996PhLA..210..377H
71. R. Horodecki P. Horodecki 1994 Quantum redundancies and local realism Phys. Lett. A 194 147 152 0959.81512 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXhslarurc%3D 1300570 1994PhLA..194..147H
72. M. Horodecki P. Horodecki 1999 Reduction criterion of separability and limits for a class of distillation protocols Phys. Rev. A 59 4206 4216 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXjtlegtL0%3D 1721040 1999PhRvA..59.4206H
73. B.M. Terhal 2002 Detecting quantum entanglement Theor. Comput. Sci. 287 313 326 1061.81015 1944457
74. K.G.H. Vollbrecht M.M. Wolf 2002 Conditional entropies and their relation to entanglement criteria J. Math. Phys. 43 4299 4306 1060.81510 1924439 2002JMP....43.4299V
75. S. Abe A.K. Rajagopal 2001 Nonadditive conditional entropy and its significance for local realism Phys. A 289 157 164 0971.94505 1805798
76. C. Tsallis S. Lloyd M. Baranger 2001 Peres criterion for separability through nonextensive entropy Phys. Rev. A 63 042104/1 042104/6 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXitlKksL4%3D 2001PhRvA..63d2104T
77. J. Batle M. Casas A. Plastino A.R. Plastino 2005 Maximally entangled mixed states and conditional entropies Phys. Rev. A 71 024301/1 024301/4 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXit1KitLc%3D 2138690 2005PhRvA..71b4301B
78. N.J. Cerf C. Adami R.M. Gingrich 1999 Reduction criterion for separability Phys. Rev. A 60 898 909 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXkslygu7c%3D 1711767 1999PhRvA..60..898C
79. R. Augusiak J. Stasińska P. Horodecki 2008 Beyond the standard entropic inequalities: stronger scalar separability criteria and their applications Phys. Rev. A 77 012333/1 012333/14 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXisFKksrw%3D 2008PhRvA..77a2333A
80. R. Augusiak J. Stasińska 2008 General scheme for construction of scalar separability criteria from positive maps Phys. Rev. A 77 010303(R)/1 010303(R)/4 2008PhRvA..77a0303A
81. R. Augusiak J. Stasińska 2009 Positive maps, majorization, entropic inequalities and detection of entanglement New J. Phys. 11 053018/1 053018/25
82. A. Datta S.T. Flammia A. Shaji C.M. Caves 2007 Constrained bounds on measures of entanglement Phys. Rev. A 75 062117/1 062117/15 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD2sXnsFaiu7w%3D 2328749 2007PhRvA..75f2117D
83. K. Chen S. Albeverio S.-M. Fei 2005 Concurrence of arbitrary dimensional bipartite quantum states Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 040504/1 040504/4 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXmsFKns7o%3D 2005PhRvL..95d0504C
84. J.I. de Vicente 2007 Lower bounds on concurrence and separability conditions Phys. Rev. A 75 052320/1 052320/5 2007PhRvA..75e2320D
85. J.I. de Vicente 2008 Erratum: Lower bounds on concurrence and separability conditions [Phys. Rev. A 75, 052320 (2007)] Phys. Rev. A 77 039903(E)/1 2008PhRvA..77c9903D
86. H.-P. Breuer 2006 Optimal entanglement criterion for mixed quantum states Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 080501/1 080501/4 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XoslKktL0%3D 2006PhRvL..97h0501B
87. W. Hall 2006 A new criterion for indecomposability of positive maps J. Phys. A 39 14119 14131 1106.81020 2277381 2006JPhA...3914119H
88. Boyd S., Vandenberghe L.: Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
89. K.M.R. Audenaert S.L. Braunstein 2004 On strong superadditivity of the entanglement of formation Commun. Math. Phys. 246 443 452 1065.81012 2053938 2004CMaPh.246..443A
90. P. Rungta C.M. Caves 2003 Concurrence-based entanglement measures for isotropic states Phys. Rev. A 67 012307/1 012307/9 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD3sXhtVKgs78%3D 2003PhRvA..67a2307R
91. A. Uhlmann 2001 On 1-qubit channels J. Phys. A 34 7047 7055 1023.81002 1863138 2001JPhA...34.7047U (Pubitemid 33577128)
92. M. Hellmund A. Uhlmann 2009 Concurrence and entanglement entropy of stochastic one-qubit maps Phys. Rev. A 79 052319/1 052319/10 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXmvF2nu7o%3D 2009PhRvA..79e2319H
93. R. Hildebrand 2007 Concurrence revisited J. Math. Phys. 48 102108/1 102108/23 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXht1GktLbN 2362773 2007JMP....48j2108H
94. J. Dodd M.A. Nielsen 2002 Simple operational interpretation of the fidelity of mixed states Phys. Rev. A 66 044301/1 044301/2 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD38XosVegs7Y%3D 1955147 2002PhRvA..66d4301D
95. M. Steiner 2003 Generalized robustness of entanglement Phys. Rev. A 67 054305/1 054305/4 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXksVWjtrc%3D 2003PhRvA..67e4305S
96. G. Vidal R. Tarrach 1999 Robustness of entanglement Phys. Rev. A 59 141 155 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXit1GitQ%3D%3D 1670562 1999PhRvA..59..141V
97. M.-D. Choi 1975 Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices Linear Algebra Appl. 10 285 290 0327.15018
98. A. Jamiołkowski 1972 Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semi definiteness of operators Rep. Math. Phys. 3 275 278 0252.47042 1972RpMP....3..275J
99. Bengtsson I., Zyczkowski K.: Geometry of Quantum States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)
100. R.F. Werner A.S. Holevo 2002 Counterexample of an additivity conjecture for output purity of quantum channels J. Math. Phys. 43 4353 4357 1060.94008 1924444 2002JMP....43.4353W
101. C.J. Isham N. Linden S. Scheckenberg 1994 The classification of decoherence functionals: an analog of Gleason's theorem J. Math. Phys. 35 6360 6370 0822.46076 1303050 1994JMP....35.6360I
102. B.M. Terhal P. Horodecki 2000 Schmidt number for density matrices Phys. Rev. A 61 040301(R)/1 040301(R)/4 1775394 2000PhRvA..61d0301T
103. M.A. Nielsen 1999 Condition for a class of entanglement transformations Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 436 439 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXksVChsLk%3D 1999PhRvL..83..436N
104. T.A. Brun 2004 Measuring polynomial functions of states Quant. Inf. Comp. 4 401 408 05320284 2095344